Thursday, April 4, 2019

                 The Rockefeller Dynasty Investigation 2020
                          The Eugenics Investigation

                                           Edited by Michael James Ross



The following document will seek to prosecute the Rockefellers and Rothschilds.


NEO – David Rockefeller’s Gruesome Legacy


 15 Things You Didn't Know About John D. Rockefeller


15 Things You Didn't Know About The Bilderberg Group


Alien Egyptian Artifacts Discovered In Jerusalem Kept Secret By Rockefeller Museum


Andrew Carnegie Biography, Net Worth, Quotes, Charity, Education


C.I.A  The Rockefeller Foundation


Carnegie  Rockefeller - A Short Documentary


Dark Secrets of the Rockefeller Family


David Rockefellers introduction to art In conversation with MoMA curator Ann Temkin


Dr. Jennifer Daniels on Rockefeller Medicine and Health Freedom


How Bilderberg Works An Institutional Analysis


How Rockefeller Became the Richest American Ever


Jay A Rockefellers Journey


Kill Cities by Rothschild and Rockefeller


Meet the real boss: Rockefeller & Co.


NWO Agenda Rockefeller Family History, New World Order Style


Rockefeller His Single-Minded Pursuit of Wealth - Biography, Bus


Rockefeller Medicine: History of modern healthcare and motivations of family that brought it


Rockefeller Medicine - Carnegie - Morgan - Medical Monopoly


Rockefellers & Medicine


Medicine of Rockefeller Documentary


Rockefeller: The Richest American Who Ever Lived


Rockefeller, the Chemical Industry and the FDA - NaturalNews TV


Rockefellers: The Real History of Modern Health-Care


Rothschild and Rockefeller run the Federal Reserve and control the Media


Sen Rockefeller: Let's Depopulate!!! Kill the Elders and Poison the children!!!!!




The history of Rockefeller family - documentary


The Men Who Built America | A New War | Episode 1 (1080P)


The Rockefeller File by Gary Allen


The Rockefellers - Oil Money and Power


The Rockefellers  Social Engineering - Dr. Russell Blaylock breaks it down


The Rockefellers - Who Controls the money controls the World (1978)


The Rockefellers vesves Social Engineering Dr. Russell Blaylock breaks it down.


The Rockefellers are Rothschilds Flunkeys


Rockefeller, the Chemical Industry and the FDA - NaturalNews TV


The Rockefellers The Real History of Modern Health-Care


The unauthorized biography of david rockefeller 2017 HD


The Unauthorized Biography of David Rockefeller (A 'Corbett Report' Production)


Wealthy Rockefeller Rothschild Chase business history


The Power Elite


Big Pharma Was Invented By The Rockefellers

The bitter truth is that when you go to your Western doctor, you are seen as a potential market for the medical factory’s products. For Big Pharma, there is no financial incentive to heal you, because a patient cured is a customer lost. Even if you are not sick, Big Pharma is still targeting you, trying to convince you that you are ill so that you will try its latest pill.

Western medicine has some good points, and is great in an emergency, but it’s high time people realized that today’s mainstream medicine (western medicine or allopathy), with its focus on drugs, drugs, radiation, drugs, surgery, and more drugs, is at its foundation a money spinning Rockefeller creation. reports:

The Rockefellers, of course, are one of the most rich and powerful families of the elite black nobility. Behind their spurious facade of philanthropy, they are power-hungry tyrants intent on owning the entire world, and depopulating it through eugenics-based programs like forced sterilization, water fluoridation, abortions and vaccinations.

They have either majorly or fully created (and still dominate) the United Nations, the World Health Organization, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, Planned Parenthood and many, many other organizations that either rule the world or influence culture to a large extent.

Despite the dominance of western medicine nowadays, even just 100 years ago the situation was very different, so it’s worthwhile casting our minds back to how the we got to this place. How did western medicine and the giant conglomerate of multinational pharmaceutical corporations (“Big Pharma”) become the mainstream medical system in the US and other first world nations? And what alternatives are there?


Let’s go back in time to the late 1800s. John D. Rockefeller, a man quoted to have said “competition is sin”, is the head of the Rockefeller family and has just become very rich through extracting oil from the ground. Now he is looking for ways to capitalize even further with his oil, and he comes across the idea of using coal tar – a petroleum derivative – to make substances that affect the human mind, body and nervous system. These are called drugs, and they are excellent at masking or stopping symptoms, but overall do not cure the underlying cause of a disease.

Like other elite leaders of the New World Order who fit the description of an “evil genius” – those high on intellect and low on compassion – Rockefeller used his oil money to buy out part of the massive German pharmaceutical cartel, I.G. Farben. This was the very same cartel that would later assist Hitler to implement his eugenics-based vision of a New World Order founded on racial supremacy, by manufacturing chemicals and poisons for war. With the control of drug manufacturing under his wings, Rockefeller then embarked on a decidedly wicked plan – wicked from the point of view of a free and healthy humanity, but brilliant from a business perspective.


Rockefeller saw that there were many types of doctors and healing modalities in existence at that time, from chiropractic to naturopathy to homeopathy to holistic medicine to herbal medicine and more. He wanted to eliminate the competitors of western medicine (the only modality which would propose drugs and radiation as treatment, thus enriching Rockefeller who owned the means to produce these treatments), so he hired a man called Abraham Flexner to submit a report to Congress in 1910.

This report “concluded” that there were too many doctors and medical schools in America, and that all the natural healing modalities which had existed for hundreds or thousands of years were unscientific quackery. It called for the standardization of medical education, whereby only the allopathic-based AMA be allowed to grant medical school licenses in the US.

Sadly, Congress acted upon the conclusions and made them law. Incredibly, allopathy became the standard mainstream modality, even though its 3 main methods of treatment in the 1800s had been blood-letting, surgery and the injection of toxic heavy metals like lead and mercury to supposedly displace disease! It should be noted that hemp was also demonized and criminalized not long after this, not because there is anything dangerous about it, but because it was a huge threat (as both medicine and fuel) to the Rockefeller drug and oil industries, respectively.


The story doesn’t stop there. Rockefeller and another elite leader Carnegie used their tax-exempt Foundations, from 1913 on, to offer huge grants to the best medical schools all over America – on the proviso that only an allopathic-based curriculum be taught, and that some of their agents be allowed to sit on the Board of Directors. They called this “efficient” philanthropy, which, when through the Orwellian translation unit, means they wanted a return on their investment.

They systematically dismantled the curricula of these schools by removing any mention of the natural healing power of herbs and plants, or of the importance of diet to health. The result is a system which to this day churns out doctors who are, almost always, utterly clueless about nutrition and disregard the idea that what you eat can actually heal or hurt you.

A couple of decades after this, another law was passed that further entrenched western medicine in America. The Hill-Burton Act of 1946 gave hospitals grants for construction and modernization, on the condition they provide free healthcare to anyone in need, without discrimination of any kind. Although there were good sides to this, the downside was that once people had become dependent on this system for their healthcare needs – especially those on pharmaceutical pills which need to be taken day after day without end – the system switched into a paid system, and the Rockefellers found themselves with new lifelong customers.

The bitter truth is that, in general, when you go to your Western doctor, you are seen as a potential market for the medical factory’s products. For Big Pharma, there is no financial incentive to heal you, because a patient cured is a customer lost. Even if you are not sick, Big Pharma is still targeting you, trying to convince you that you are ill (e.g. with psychiatry’s ridiculous list of fictitious diseases, many of them fake) so that you will try its latest pill. Pregnant women who go to the doctor are treated like this, and peddled intravenous fluid bags, fetal monitors, ultrasound (radiation for a vulnerable baby), a host of drugs, the totally unnecessary episiotomy, and – to top it all off – the Caesarean delivery!


Remember, all these synthetic drugs are isolates. Many are derived from plant compounds, but because Nature cannot be patented and sold, Big Pharma has no interest in natural cures. What they do instead is engage in bio-piracy – research natural compounds, copy them (or modify them slightly) in a lab, then try to steal and patent them.

If they get a patent, they then market their pill as a wonder drug while simultaneously (through fake scientific research) suppress and criticize the original plant as being worthless, so you won’t go to the source of the cure. Ironically, guess what type of medicine John D. Rockefeller used and the British Royal Family still uses? Homeopathy!

Modern western medicine seems to have lost the supposed point of its existence: healing people. In his revealing book “Confessions of a Medical Heretic“, Dr. Robert Mendolsohn quotes an article entitled “Cleveland’s Marvelous Medical Factory” which boasted of the Cleveland Clinic’s “accomplishments last year: 2,980 open-heart operations, 1.3 million laboratory tests, 73,320 electrocardiograms, 7,770 full-body x-ray scans, 24,368 surgical procedures.”

Seems fancy, yet none of these procedures has been proven to have anything to do with maintaining or restoring health. When people get screened for a disease, they are being subjected to dangerous radiation (more money for the Rockefellers) which harms tissue and can end up causing the exact disease it is supposed to be protecting against – as happens daily with the mammogram scam, designed to drum up new breast cancer clients.


10 Horrifying Facts About American Eugenics

10. What It Was
9. 30 States And 60,000 Victims
8. Feeble-Minded, Deaf, And Orphans
7. Supported By Alexander Graham Bell And The Rockefellers
6. The Racial Integrity Act

The Racial Integrity Act of Virginia was established in 1924. The purpose was to document the race of every person in the state, allowing for a massive genetic database to be created. The database was necessary for the rest of the law—making sure that someone whose heritage was purely white married only another similarly pure person.

State Registrars were forbidden from issuing a marriage license unless the man and the woman in question could both produce such a certificate stating that there was no trace of any race other than Caucasian in their ancestry. If the clerk had any reason to doubt that the racial profile was accurate, they didn’t have to grant a marriage license, either—not until both parties submitted proof that they actually, truly were white. Lying about your race on the form was a felony, and could be punished by up to a year in jail.

5. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
4. The Immigrant Problem
3. Better Babies And Fitter Families Contests
2. Pioneered By A Stanford Professor
1. Inspired Hitler’s Master Race


British psychiatry: from eugenics to assassination


Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population, Report Says


Rockefeller Philanthropy and Modern Social Science

Published by EH.Net (December 2014)

David L. Seim, Rockefeller Philanthropy and Modern Social Science. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2013.  ix + 265 pp. $120 (cloth), ISBN: 978-1-84893-391-0.

Reviewed for EH.Net by Donald T. Critchlow, Department of History, Arizona State University.

In this age of excessive wealth, the Rockefellers, John D. and his son John D. Jr., in the early twentieth century provide an example of how great wealth can be used to better the world.  Through the establishment of the Rockefeller Foundation, huge sums of money were given to philanthropic causes.  The Rockefeller Foundation’s greatest contribution arguable lay in the advancement of medicine, but its efforts in education and the social sciences were notable.

Historian David Seim focuses his short book on the Rockefeller philanthropy in the social sciences from 1900 through 1920.  Seim eschews deep analysis for a straight-forward narrative of Rockefeller involvement in a wide-range of projects to support individual social scientists, advance social science research and education, and institutionalize the social sciences within universities and inter-disciplinary research institutions.  His book reads like a lengthy institutional report on a dizzying array of projects, but the wealth of information contained in his study is rewarding for any scholar interested in the history of the social sciences, university education, race relations, and public policy in the twentieth-century.

The period from the late nineteenth century up to the Great Depression starting in 1929 can be described as the “Golden Age” of the American social sciences. The emergence of the modern social sciences in this period, so ably described by historians such as Thomas Haskell, Barry Karl, Lawrence Cremin, Mary Furner, and others, projected an optimism that empirical social science research could better the world. The accumulation of empirically derived knowledge about human behavior and nature, these early social scientists maintained, was critical to reforming society, ensuring progress, and overcoming what they believed was a lag between scientific and technological advancement and traditional culture and customs. The confidence of early social scientists in their role in advancing society manifested hubris, but in the process American higher education was transformed and the social sciences became institutionalized. John D. Rockefeller, his son, and a brilliant staff played a critical role in this transformation.

Having earned a fortune in oil, John D. Rockefeller, a devout Baptist, believed that his wealth should be put to use in bettering the world.  At first he directed his charity toward mostly missionary organizations, educational institutions, and projects. From the outset he gave significant funds to African-American and Native American causes, including black seminaries and Indian schools. Overwhelmed by requests for support — sometimes reaching hundreds of letters each day — Rockefeller hired Dr. Frederick T. Gates, a Minneapolis minister, to organize his philanthropic activities. After retiring in 1896 from business, John D. Rockefeller joined with his son, John D. Junior, to direct his philanthropy. In 1901, they decided to establish the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. This was followed by the establishment of the General Education Board, which directed much of its money toward the South and black education. In 1913, they established the Rockefeller Foundation. With the specific goal of serving “The Well Being of Mankind throughout the World” (Seim, pp. 58-59). The Rockefeller Foundation collaborated with the Carnegie Institution and the Russell Sage Foundation in promoting the social sciences.

The first efforts of the Rockefeller Foundation were small, providing financial support to the Bureau of Social Hygiene, a Division of Industrial Relations, and an Institute of Economics (1922), which later developed into the Brookings Institution.  The Bureau of Social Hygiene provided support for research into the “prostitution problem,” eugenics, and the establishment of Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League.

The turning point in Rockefeller’s involvement in the social sciences came with the establishment of the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial Fund in 1918, named after Rockefeller’s late wife. With an original endowment of $13 million, later extended to $74 million, an extensive program developed providing funds to assist the well-being of women and children and providing major resources to an effort to promote the broad advancement of knowledge, methods and application in the social sciences. The first years of the Spelman Memorial Fund focused on women and children, including support for the East Harlem Health Center, the Maternity Center Association of Manhattan, the YMCA and YWCA, the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, the Salvation Army, and the American Child Health Association. Headed by Beardsley Ruml, a University of Chicago trained Ph.D., who had studied with James R. Angell, the Memorial Fund turned its attention to the advancement of the social sciences in 1923. Key advisers such as Abraham Flexner, Raymond Fosdick, and Henry Embree played important roles in shaping the Memorial Fund program.

Seim details the multiple activities of the Spelman Memorial Fund through specific grants to educational institutions, individual research projects, the creation of research centers, and areas of research.  Seim ably outlines the full extent of these projects, showing how Ruml and his associates carefully developed and directed a program to fund the social sciences in America.  The major focus of this program was to redress what was seen as a cultural lag in American society, and to develop knowledge useful to maintaining what was described at the time as “social control” in human behavior. By social control, as Seim observes, Rockefeller people meant social advancement. This was a reform agenda that sought to distinguish between narrow business and class interests and empirical research by non-partisan expertise.

As these research programs developed, Ruml and his advisers expressed particular concern that funds be targeted toward institutional advancement within the universities and interdisciplinary organizations. Ruml did not limit funding to only American universities. In 1923, the London School of Economics began a long-term relationship with the Rockefeller Foundation.

In America, Ruml targeted funding major institutions, including the University of Chicago, which was founded largely with John D. Rockefeller money in 1892. Spelman Memorial funds provided vital in developing what became known as the Chicago School in Sociology. Much of the Chicago school of sociology focused on studies of ethnic and race relations. This focus on race relations was evident as well in funding to the University of North Carolina, where major research was conducted on the state and the means of bettering race relations in the South. At Columbia University in New York, Rockefeller funded major research on black southern migration to the North. Major Spelman Memorial grants went to Harvard University, especially to support the pioneering work of G. Elton Mayo.  Other funding — also on race relations — went to Western Reserve University in Cleveland, and Charles S. Johnson at Fisk University. A graduate student of Robert E. Park at University of Chicago, Johnson published in 1930 The Negro in American Civilization.

Spelman Memorial funds were directed to China, the Soviet Union, Sweden, and Western Europe, often toward research in what now would be called economic development. Seim notes that one of the black marks on Spelman Memorial funding during this period was support of eugenics research in the United States, as well as in Australia and Germany, where funds were used to support the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity. At the same time, Ruml supported research in international relations with a particular goal of aiding the League of Nations. Major funding helped launch the Social Science Research Council, under the direction of University of Chicago political scientist Charles Merriam. Less attention was given to the humanities, although the fund directed some funding toward historians, especially in France.

Seim ends his study with the merging of the Spelman Fund into the Rockefeller Foundation in 1929.  In accomplishing his intent to explain “the creation of the ideal of neutral, public-oriented social scientists (p. 239), Seim does not evaluate more fundamental questions raised by the rise of specialized, empirical social science research. The mindset of Ruml and the Rockefeller Foundation assumed that empirical social science research would improve the world. In many ways, it did and continues to do so today. Yet the mindset of early Rockefeller Foundation officers often precluded larger fundamental questions that had been explored by earlier philosophers and political thinkers: The ancient Greeks, Plato and Aristotle, asked basic questions as to the meaning of truth, justice, and a good society?  Adam Smith and David Hume examined what makes for a well-ordered society?  Alexis de Tocqueville, less than a century before the founding of the Rockefeller Foundation, asked about the relationship of equality and liberty in a democratic society, while warning of a “soft-despotism” that comes with a breakdown in civil society and the rise of a bureaucratic state. Already in the 1920s, political thinkers such as Ludwig von Mises and F.A. Hayek were challenging the hubris of economic planners and regulators. Earlier thinkers may have reached wrong conclusions, but debate over these fundamental issues rests generally outside the realm of narrow empirical social science research, as envisioned by the “new” social science in the early twentieth century.

The new social scientists in this golden age rejected the deductive reasoning of the past –the ancient Greeks and Christian theologians. The new social scientists found such debate maddening and ultimately irresolvable.  Yet, without dismissing the importance of the contributions that empirical modern social science can impart to our understanding of the world — often funded then and today by philanthropic foundations — the question that should have confronted the promoters of the new social sciences was simply: Are we too narrow, too exclusive, and too confident as to the ultimate contribution which we can make to what makes for a just, well-ordered, liberal society in our often facile dismissal of previous thinkers?

Donald T. Critchlow is Director of the Arizona State University Center for Political Thought and Leadership. His most books include The Brookings Institution: Expertise and the Public Interest in a Democratic Society; When Hollywood Was Right: How Movie Moguls, Film Stars, and Big Business Remade American Politics; and A Very Short Introduction to American Political History (forthcoming).


Hitler’s Employee Of The Rockefeller Foundation


Chapter 29 – Population Control, NAZIs & The U.N.


David Rockefeller Was Obsessed With Eugenics & Globalism


War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race


WARNING: Rockefeller/Rothschild Drug Cartel Exposed Creating, Releasing, Injecting, Infecting and Depopulating Planet with Pandemic H1N1/H5N1 Viruses


The Ku Klux Klan in Calvin Coolidge’s America


Exposing the Global Population Control Agenda


For The Record: Rockefeller Soft Kill Depopulation Plans Exposed

March 26, 2012

Jurriaan Maessen
March 26, 2012

In the course of August and September 2010, I wrote several articles for Infowars on the Rockefeller Foundation’s admitted funding and developing of anti-fertility vaccines intended for “mass-scale distribution.” As the soft-kill depopulation agenda accelerates it seems all the more relevant to re-post these articles as one. I ask the great Infowars-readership to project this information out to as many people as possible. Only by countering the elite’s disinformation with genuine information do we stand a chance against their plans for humanity.

1: Rockefeller Foundation Developed Vaccines For “Mass-Scale” Fertility Reduction

In its 1968 yearly report, the Rockefeller Foundation acknowledged funding the development of so-called “anti-fertility vaccines” and their implementation on a mass-scale. From page 51 onward we read:

“(…) several types of drugs are known to diminish male fertility, but those that have been tested have serious problems of toxicity. Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.”

The possibility of using vaccines to reduce male fertility was something that needed to be investigated further, according to the Rockefeller Foundation, because both the oral pill and the IUD were not suitable for mass-scale distribution:

“We are faced with the danger that within a few years these two “modern” methods, for which such high hopes have been held, will in fact turn out to be impracticable on a mass scale.”

The possibility of administrating hormone preparations to reduce fertility was also mentioned, although- states the report- they have been known to “cause bleeding problems, which may limit their usefulness.”

“A semipermanent or renewable subcutaneous implant of these hormones has been suggested, but whether or not the same difficulties would result has not been determined.”

Saying that research thus-far had been too low-grade to produce any substantial results, the report was adamant:

“The Foundation will endeavour to assist in filling this important gap in several ways:

1- “Seeking out or encouraging the development of, and providing partial support to, a few centres of excellence in universities and research institutions in the United States and abroad in which the methods and points of view of molecular biology are teamed with the more traditional approaches of histology, embryology,and endocrinology in research pertinent to development of fertility control methods;”

2- “Supporting research of individual investigators, oriented toward development of contraceptive methods or of basic information on human reproduction relevant to such developments;”

3- “Encouraging, by making research funds available, as well as by other means, established and beginning investigators to turn their attention to aspects of research in reproductive biology that have implications for human fertility and its control;”

4- “Encouraging more biology and biochemistry students to elect careers in reproductive biology and human fertility control, through support of research and teaching programs in departments of zoology, biology, and biochemistry.”

The list goes on and on. Motivation for these activities, according to the RF?

“There are an estimated five million women among America’s poverty and near-poverty groups who need birth control service (…). The unchecked fertility of the indigent does much to perpetuate poverty, undereducation, and underemployment, not only in urban slums, but also in depressed rural areas.”

It wasn’t long before all the Foundation’s efforts began to have effect. In its annual report of 1988, The RF was happy to report the progress made by the Foundation’s Population Division in the field of anti-fertility vaccines:

“India’s National Institute of Immunology successfully completed in 1988 the first phase of trials with three versions of an anti-fertility vaccine for women. Sponsored by the government of India and supported by the Foundation, the trials established that with each of the tested vaccines, at least one year of protection against pregnancy could be expected, based on the levels of antibodies formed in response to the immunization schedule.”

In its 1997 review of anti-fertility vaccines, Indian based International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology didn’t forget to acknowledge its main benefactor:

“The work on LHRH and HCG vaccines was supported by research grants of The Rockefeller Foundation, (…).”

In the 1990s the work on anti-fertility vaccines went in overdrive, especially in third-world nations, as did the funding provided by the deep pockets of the Rockefeller Foundation. At the same time, the target-population of the globalists- women- began to stir uncomfortably with all this out-in-the-open talk of population reduction and vaccines as a means to achieve it.

Betsy Hartman, Director of the Population and Development Program at Hampshire College, Massachusetts and “someone who believes strongly in women’s right to safe, voluntary birth control and abortion”, is no supporter of the anti-fertility vaccine, as brought into being by the Rockefeller Foundation. She explains in her essay Population control in the new world order:

“Although one vaccine has been tested on only 180 women in India, it is being billed there as ‘safe, devoid of any side effects and completely reversible’. The scientific community knows very well that such assertions are false – for instance, many questions still remain about the vaccine’s long-term impact on the immune system and menstrual cycle. There is also evidence on film of women being denied information about the vaccine in clinical trials. Nevertheless, the vaccine is being prepared for large-scale use.”

The Women’s Global Network for Reproductive Rights based in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, quoted “a leading contraceptive researcher as saying:

“Immunological birth control methods will be an ‘antigenic weapon’ against the reproductive process, which left unchecked, threatens to swamp the world.”

Animal rights activist ms. Sonya Ghosh also expressed concerns about the Rockefeller-funded anti-fertility vaccine and its implementation:

“Instead of giving individual women more options to prevent pregnancy and protect against AIDs and sexually transmitted diseases, the anti fertility vaccine is designed to be easily administered to large numbers of women using the least resources. If administered to illiterate populations the issues of user control and informed consent are further cause for concern.”

To avoid such debates, the Foundation has in the last couple of decades consorted to its long-practised and highly successful methods of either outright lying through its teeth or using deceptive language to hide the fact that it continues to work tirelessly toward its long-stated mission. If you think the RF and others have abandoned their anti-fertility efforts with the help of vaccines, think again or read this article.

2: Global Distribution of Rockefeller-Funded Anti-Fertility Vaccine Coordinated by WHO

In addition to the recent PrisonPlanet-exclusive Rockefeller Foundation Developed Vaccines For “Mass-Scale” Fertility Reduction- which outlines the Rockefeller Foundation’s efforts in the 1960s funding research into so-called “anti-fertility vaccines”- another series of documents has surfaced, proving beyond any doubt that the UN Population Fund, World Bank and World Health Organization picked up on it, further developing it under responsibility of a “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation”.

Just four years after the Rockefeller Foundation launched massive funding-operations into anti-fertility vaccines, the Task Force was created under auspices of the World Health Organization, World Bank and UN Population Fund. Its mission, according to one of its members, to support:

“basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo. These studies have involved the use of advanced procedures in peptide chemistry, hybridoma technology and molecular genetics as well as the evaluation of a number of novel approaches in general vaccinology. As a result of this international, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.”

In regards to the scope of the Task Force’s jurisdiction, the Biotechnology and Development Monitor reported:

“The Task Force acts as a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D in the various working groups and supports research on different approaches, such as anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines and vaccines designed to neutralize the biological functions of hCG. The Task Force has succeeded in developing a prototype of an anti-hCG-vaccine.”

One of the Task Force members, P.D. Griffin, outlined the purpose and trajectory of these Fertility Regulating Vaccines. Griffin:

“The Task Force has continued to coordinate its research activities with other vaccine development programmes within WHO and with other international and national programmes engaged in the development of fertility regulating vaccines.”

Griffin also admitted to the fact that one of the purposes of the vaccines is the implementation in developing countries. Griffin:

“If vaccines could be developed which could safely and effectively inhibit fertility, without producing unacceptable side effects, they would be an attractive addition to the present armamentarium of fertility regulating methods and would be likely to have a significant impact on family planning programmes.”

Also, one of the advantages of the FRVs over “currently available methods of fertility regulation” the Task Force states, is the following (179):

“low manufacturing cost and ease of delivery within existing health services.”

Already in 1978, the WHO’s Task Force (then called Task Force on Immunological Methods for Fertility Regulation) underlined the usefulness of these vaccines in regards to the possibility of “large scale synthesis and manufacture” of the vaccine:

“The potential advantages of an immunological approach to fertility regulation can be summarized as follows: (a) the possibility of infrequent administration, possibly by paramedical personnel; (b) the use of antigens or antigen fragments, which are not pharmacologically active; and (c) in the case of antigens of known chemical structure, there is the possibility of large-scale synthesis and manufacture of vaccine at relatively low cost.”

In 1976, the WHO Expanded Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction published a report, stating:

“In 1972 the Organization (…) expanded its programme of research in human reproduction to provide an international focus for an intensified effort to improve existing methods of fertility regulation, to develop new methods and to assist national authorities in devising the best ways of providing them on a continuing basis. The programme is closely integrated with other WHO research on the delivery of family planning care by health services, which in turn feeds into WHO’s technical assistance programme to governments at the service level.”

Although the term “Anti-Fertility Vaccine”, coined by the Rockefeller Foundation, was replaced by the more bureaucratic sounding “Fertility Regulating Vaccine (FRV), the programme was obviously the same. Besides, the time-line shows conclusively that the WHO, UN Population Fund and World Bank continued on a path outlined by the Rockefellers in the late 1960s. By extension, it proves that all these organization are perfectly interlocked, best captured under the header “Scientific Dictatorship”. The relationship between the WHO and the Rockefeller Foundation is intense. In the 1986 bulletin of the World Health Organization, this relationship is being described in some detail. While researching the effectiveness of “gossypol” as an “antifertility agent”, the bulletin states:

“The Rockefeller Foundation has supported limited clinical trials in China and smallscale clinical studies in Brazil and Austria. The dose administered in the current Chinese trial has been reduced from 20 mg to 10-15 mg/day during the loading phase in order to see if severe oligospermia rather than consistent azoospermia would be adequate for an acceptable, non-toxic and reversible effect. Meanwhile, both the WHO human reproduction programme and the Rockefeller Foundation are supporting animal studies to better define the mechanism of action of gossypol.”

In August of 1992, a series of meetings was held in Geneva, Switzerland, regarding “fertility regulating vaccines”. According to the document Fertility Regulating Vaccines (classified by the WHO with a limited distribution) present at those meetings were scientists and clinicians from all over the globe, including then biomedical researcher of the American Agency for International development, and current research-chief of USAID, Mr. Jeff Spieler.

In 1986 Mr. Spieler declared:

“A new approach to fertility regulation is the development of vaccines directed against human substances required for reproduction. Potential candidates for immunological interference include reproductive hormones, ovum and sperm antigens, and antigens derived from embryonic or fetal tissue.(…). An antifertility vaccine must be capable of safely and effectively inhibiting a human substance, which would need somehow to be rendered antigenic. A fertility-regulating vaccine, moreover, would have to produce and sustain effective immunity in at least 95% of the vaccinated population, a level of protection rarely achieved even with the most successful viral and bacterial vaccines. But while these challenges looked insuperable just a few years ago, recent advances in biotechnology- particularly in the fields of molecular biology, genetic engineering and monoclonal antibody production- are bringing antifertility vaccines into the realm of the feasible.”

“Vaccines interfering with sperm function and fertilization could be available for human testing by the early 1990s”, Spieler wrote.

In order for widespread use of these vaccines, Spieler writes, the vaccine must conquer “variations in individual responses to immunization with fertility-regulating vaccines”.

“Research”, he goes on to say,”is also needed in the field of “basic vaccinology”, to find the best carrier proteins, adjuvants, vehicles and delivery systems.”

In the 1992 document, the problem of “variations in individual responses” is also discussed:

“Because of the genetic diversity of human populations”, states the document, “immune responses to vaccines often show marked differences from one individual to another in terms of magnitude and duration. These differences may be partly or even completely overcome with appropriately engineered FRVs (Fertility Regulating Vaccines) and by improvements in our understanding of what is required to develop and control the immune response elicited by different vaccines.”

The picture emerging from these facts is clear. The WHO, as a global coordinating body, has since the early 1970s continued the development of the Rockefeller-funded “anti-fertility vaccine”. What also is becoming clear, is that extensive research has been done to the delivery systems in which these anti-fertility components can be buried, such as regular anti-viral vaccines. It’s a mass-scale anti-fertilization programme with the aim of reducing the world’s population: a dream long cherished by the global elite.

3: On Top of Vaccines, Rockefeller Foundation Presents Anti-Fertility Substance Gossypol for “Widespread Use”

It seems there is no limit to the Rockefeller Foundation’s ambitions to introduce anti-fertility compounds into either existing “health-services”, such as vaccines, or- as appears to be the case now- average consumer-products.

The 1985 Rockefeller Foundation’s annual report underlined its ongoing dedication towards finding good use for the anti-fertility substance “gossypol”, or C30H30O8 – as the description reads.

Indeed, gossypol, a toxic polyphenol derived from the cotton plant, was identified early on in the Foundation’s research as an effective sterilant. The question was, how to implement or integrate the toxic substance into crops.

“Another long-term interest of the Foundation has been gossypol, a compound that has been shown to have an antifertility effect in men, By the end of 1985, the Foundation had made grants totaling approximately $1.6 million in an effort to support and stimulate scientific investigations on the safety and efficacy of gossypol.”

In the 1986 Rockefeller Foundation annual report, the organization admits funding research into the use of fertility-reducing compounds in relation to food for “widespread use”:

“Male contraceptive studies are focused on gossypol, a natural substance extracted from the cotton plant, and identified by Chinese researchers as having an anti-fertility effect on men. Before widespread use can be recommended, further investigation is needed to see if lowering the dosage can eliminate undesirable side-effects without reducing its effectiveness as a contraceptive. The Foundation supported research on gossypol’s safety, reversibility and efficacy in seven different 1986 grants.”

In the RF’s 1988 annual report, gossypol as a contraceptive was also elaborated upon (page 22):

“Gossypol, a natural substance found in the cotton plant, continues to show promise as an oral contraceptive for men. Because it suppresses sperm production without affecting sex hormone levels, it is unique among the experimental approaches to fertility control in men. Foundation-funded scientists worldwide have assembled an aray of information about how gossypol works, and studies continue on a wide variety of its clinical applications. Dose reduction is being investigated to reduce health risks associated with the use of gossypol.”

The following year, according to the annual report, funds were allocated to several research institutions to see how this “dose reduction” could best be accomplished without interfering with the ant-fertility effects of gossypol.

(1988- $ 400,000, in addition to remaining funds from prior year appropriations) To support research on gossypol, its safety, reversibility, and efficacy as a contraceptive for use by men (…).”

Mention is made on money allocated to the University of Texas, “for a study of gossypol’s effects on DNA replication (…).”

The last mention of gossypol in the Foundation’s annals we find in the 1994 annual report, where funds were appropriated to the University of Innsbruck of Austria “for a study at the Institute of Physiology on the molecular action of gossypol at the cellular level.”

It seems that the funded scientists have indeed found a way of “lowering the dosage” of gossypol, circumventing the toxicity of the substance, so as to suppress or even eliminate these “undesirable side-effects”, which include: low blood potassium levels, fatigue, muscle weakness and even paralysis. If these effects could be eliminated without reducing the anti-fertility effects, the Foundation figured, it would be a highly effective and almost undetectable sterilant.

Although overtly, research into and development of gossypol as an anti-fertility compound was abandoned in the late 1990s, the cottonseed containing the substance was especially selected for mass distribution in the beginning of the current decade. Around 2006 a media-campaign was launched, saying the cottonseed could help defeat hunger and poverty.

In 2006, NatureNews reported that RNA interference (or RNAi) was the way to go. On the one hand it would “cut the gossypol content in cottonseeds by 98%, while leaving the chemical defenses of the rest of the plant intact.” Furthermore, the article quoted Dr. Deborah P. Delmer, the Rockefeller Foundation’s associate director of food security, who was quick to bury any concern:

“Deborah Delmer, associate director of the Rockefeller Foundation in New York City and an expert in agricultural food safety, points out that a benefit of using RNAi technology is that it turns off a gene process rather than switching on a novel function. “So instead of introducing a new foreign protein, you’re just shutting down one process,” Delmer says. “In that sense, I think that the safety concerns should be far less than other GM technologies.”

A 2006, National Geographic article Toxin-Free Cottonseed Engineered; Could Feed Millions Study Says, quotes the director of the Laboratory for Crop Transformation (Texas A&M Universtity), Keerti Singh Rathore as saying:

“A gossypol-free cottonseed would significantly contribute to human nutrition and health, particularly in developing countries, and help meet the requirements of the predicted 50 percent increase in the world population in the next 50 years.”

“Rathore’s study”, states the article, “represents the first substantiated case where gossypol was reduced via genetic engineering that targets the genes that make the toxin.”

I bring into recollection the statement made by the Rockefeller Foundation in its 1986 annual report, which reads:

“Before widespread use can be recommended, further investigation is needed to see if lowering the dosage can eliminate undesirable side-effects without reducing its effectiveness as a contraceptive.”

In the 1997 Foundational report, Rathore is mentioned (page 68). A postdoctoral fellowship-grant was given to a certain E. Chandrakanth “for advanced study in plant molecular biology under the direction of Keerti S. Rathore, Laboratory for Crop Transformation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.”

Compromising connections, in other words, for someone who claimed academic objectivity in regards to gossypol and its sterilizing effects. Rathore explained the workings of RNAi in a 2006 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“Cottonseed toxicity due to gossypol is a long-standing problem”, Rathore said, “and people have tried to fix it but haven’t been able to through traditional plant breeding. My area of research is plant transgenics, so I thought about using some molecular approaches to address this problem.”

Rathore also mentioned the desired main funder of his work without actually saying the name:

“we are trying to find some partners and will probably be looking at charitable foundations to help us out in terms of doing all kinds of testing that is required before a genetically engineered plant is approved for food or feed. We are in the very early stages and have a lot of ideas in mind, but we need to pursue those. Hopefully, we can find some sort of partnership that will allow us to do them.”

He also expressed the final adaptation of the cottonseed for widespread use is something of the long term:

“(…) right now there are many hurdles when you are dealing with a genetically modified plant. But I think in the next 15 or 20 years a lot of these regulations that we have to satisfy will be eliminated or reduced substantially.”

The Foundation, as is evident from the statements of Rockefeller’s own Deborah Delmer, is more than interested. Even worse, through the process of readying gossypol for mass-distribution in food, the fulfillment of their longstanding goal of sterilizing the populous into oblivion comes into view.

4: Rockefeller Foundation Conceptualized “Anti-Hormone” Vaccine in the 1920s and 30s, Reports Reveal

Rockefeller Foundation minion Max Mason, who acted as president in the mid-1930s, on multiple occasions expressed his master’s desire for an “anti-hormone” that would reduce fertility worldwide. Now keep in mind, this is more than 35 years before the Foundation actually mentioned funding “anti-fertility vaccines” in subsequent annual reports from 1969 onward.

Having traveled far beyond the realm of rumor and speculation, research into the admitted funding of anti-fertility vaccines has uncovered more and more sinister revelations along the way.

By the mid-1930s, Mason of the Rockefeller Foundation thought that “the ultimate solution of the problem [of birth control] may well lie in the studies of endocrinology, particularly antihormones.” The Foundation’s 1934 annual report states:

“The Rockefeller Foundation has decided to concentrate its present effort in the natural sciences on the field of modern experimental biology, with special interest in such topics as endocrinology, nutrition, genetics, embryology, problems centering about the reproductive process, psychobiology, general and cellular physiology, biophysics, and biochemistry.”

“(…) research work is being conducted on the physiology of reproduction in the monkey. This work was begun at the Johns Hopkins University in 1921, and since 1923 has been continued at the University of Rochester. It involves observational and experimental studies of the reproductive cycle in certain species of the higher primates, in which this cycle closely resembles that of the human species. The effect of the various interrelated reproductive hormones is being studied.”

In the annual report of the previous year (1933), the Foundation stresses the fact that work on the reproductive hormones of primates serves to experiment on man in the future:

“(…) much work has been done in the formulation and solution of basic problems in the general biology and physiology of sex in organisms other than man. It was essential that this fundamental work on infra-man pave the way for that on man.”

In the book Discipling Reproduction by Adele E. Clarke, the roots of Rockefeller-funded “anti-hormones” is being described in some detail, pointing out that the family’s ambitions to control man’s fertility date back even further than the 1930s. Clarke writes:

“On a cold morning in 1921, George Washington Corner, a physician and fledgling reproductive scientist, awoke in Baltimore to discover that it was snowing.”

“By 1929”, Clarke writes a bit further on, “Corner had mapped out the hormonal action of progesterone, an essential actor in the menstrual cycle and subsequently an actor in birth control pills.”

The 1935 Rockefeller Foundation annual report acknowledges funding Dr. Corner’s research:

“To the University of Rochester, for research on the physiology of reproduction under the direction of Dr. G. W. Corner during the threeyear period beginning July 1, 1935, and ending June 30, 1938, there has been appropriated the sum of $9,900. Dr. Corner’s activities are concentrated on a study of the oestrus cycle, using monkeys as the experimental animals. A colony of about thirty monkeys has been maintained, and experiments have furnished information on the normal histology of the reproductive cycle, the time of ovulation, the relation of ovulation to menstruation and other anatomically detectable correlations of the oestrus cycle. Work is continuing on two main lines: normal sex reproduction in the monkey, including the histology of ovary and uterus, and, secondly, the effects of the ovarian hormone.”

Again, never forget that the Foundation in 1933 stated outright that “It was essential that this fundamental work on infra-man pave the way for that on man.”

Another essential problem which arises, of course, is how exactly the funding-mechanism worked by which Corner’s research could be made ready for mass-consumption. Clarke mentions that officially the National Research Council, an arm of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), was the institute responsible for the task of doing so. More specific: the Committee for Research in Problems of Sex (CRPS):

“The NRC itself was founded in 1916 as an agency to inventory research toward enhanced military preparedness.”

“The NRC”, states the author, “was a prestigious organization from its inception, thanks to its early association with the NAS, the Carnegie Corporation, and the Rockefeller Foundation. Kohler (1991:109) has argued that the NRC essentially served as an intermediary between the foundations and scientists in the interwar years.(…). The NRC/CRPS itself was funded almost exclusively by Rockefeller monies, initially through the Bureau of Social Hygiene and, after 1931, through the Rockefeller Foundation.”

On the subject of so-called “current immunological contraceptive research”, Clarke channels Rockefeller-president Max Mason:

“Other lines of current immunological contraceptive research continue to seek what, during the 1930s, Max Mason of the Rockefeller Foundation called “anti-hormones”: vaccines to block hormones needed for very early pregnancy and a vaccine to block the hormone needed for the surface of the egg to function properly.”

In a February 1934 “progress report” written by Warren Weaver (director of the Natural Sciences Division of the Rockefeller Foundation) once again underlined the endgame:

“Can man gain an intelligent control of his own power? Can we develop so sound and extensive a genetics that we can hope to breed, in the future, superior men? Can we obtain enough knowledge of physiology and psychobiology of sex so that man can bring this pervasive, highly important, and dangerous aspect of life under rational control?”

The same Warren Weaver wrote a “biographical Memoir” in honor of his friend Max Mason, revealing some more interesting facts. Weaver, who describes himself as a great personal friend of Mason, gives a general description of him as Rockefeller-minion:

“He had by that time developed a consuming interest in behavioral research, and particularly in the possibility that the physical sciences, working with and through the biological sciences, could shed new and revealing light on the normal and abnormal behavior of individuals, and ultimately on the social behavior of groups of men.”

Here we have it. The blueprint for sterilizing vaccines has been first conceptualized way back in the 1920s and 1930s by social scientists of the Rockefeller Foundation. Although later the eugenic language (“anti-fertility vaccine”) was polished up with the help of some linguistic plastic surgery producing the term “immunological contraceptive”, the ultimate goal remains the same.


A Life of Passion: Progressive Eugenics and Planned Parenthood


Rockefeller Associates

John Davison Rockefeller (1839-1937), the world’s first billionaire, was America’s most generous philanthropist, fascist financier and Nazi collaborator.

Although Rockefeller’s wealth was based largely on a near global control of oil refining, he also had large interests in other monoplies. As Anthony Sutton notes, Rockefeller

    “controlled the copper trust, the smelters trust and the gigantic tobacco trust, in addition to having influence in some Morgan properties such as the U.S. Steel Corporation as well as in hundreds of smaller industrial trusts, public service operations, railroads and banking institutions. National City Bank was the largest of the banks influenced by Standard Oil-Rockefeller, but financial control extended to the U.S. Trust Co. and Hanover National Bank [and] major life insurance companies – Equitable Life and Mutual of New York” (Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, 1981).

His incredible rags-to-riches success story owes much to what he learned from his father’s attitudes towards business and respect for the public good. Descended from hardworking German immigrants, his father William Avery Rockefeller was a travelling, snake oil salesman. “Big Bill” excelled as a quack doctor, or pitch man, conning the sick and desperate into buying expensive remedies that were either useless or downright dangerous. “He would be gone for months and come back with a great roll of money…. He would go to small towns and put up handbills advertising himself as ‘The Celebrated Dr. Levingston.’ He advertised to cure anything, but made a specialty of cancer and kidney troubles” (MacDonald, “Double Life,” New York World, February 2, 1908). But these were not “Doc’s” only crimes. He was indicted for rape, but was not arrested or tried. He fled the area with family and escaped neighbours who accused him of horse thieving, burglary, arson and counterfeiting. He had two wives, simultaneously, and was a bigamist for 34 years. He met his second wife in Norwich, Ontario, where he sold lumber in 1853, calling himself William Levingston.

William’s example provided ample life lessons to his sons about the business values of duplicity, deceit, and a blatant disregard for public health. John dropped out of high school in 1855 to take a business course. He worked as a bookkeeper and then teamed up with a friend to start a grain commission business. In 1863, the Civil War propelled him into the oil business. That year, he – like J.P. Morgan and other rising stars – paid $300 to avoid conscription. It was a small price for them, but unattainable for the thousands who would die. At first, he sold whiskey at inflated rates to Federal soldiers. Then, he invested his profits in oil refineries. The South had been supplying turpentine to the North for camphene-fueled lights. When the war cut off the North’s access to this fuel, kerosene from Pennsylvania oil quickly took over as the lamp fuel of choice and stimulated his oil business.

In 1865, Rockefeller bought out his partners in the kerosene business for $72,500. In 1870, he and a few others, organized The Standard Oil Company, with capital of $1 million. He built his company by buying out competitors, price cutting and controlling secondary businesses related to pipelines, trains, oil terminals and barrel making. By 1880, his monopoly controlled the refining of 95% of America’s oil. In 1885, 70% of Standard Oil’s sales were overseas, largely to northern Europe and Russia. All of its properties were merged into the Standard Oil Trust with an initial capitalization of $70 million, and by 1900 Rockefeller controlled about two-thirds of the entire world’s oil supply. He was also a director of the U.S. Steel Corp when it formed in 1901.

In the 1880s, an oil boom was brewing in Tsarist Russia, around the Caspian Sea town of Baku. Robert Nobel, the son of Alfred Nobel (originator of Sweden’s peace prize and the inventor of dynamite), was soon competing with the Parisian Rothschilds for control of Central Asia oil treasure. Their exports threatened Rockefeller’s near global oil monopoly, especially when Marcus Samuel, future founder of Shell Oil, developed tankers to carry the Rothchild’s oil to Europe and Asia. In 1903, Rockefeller made a deal with the Tsarist government to lease and then buy the Baku oil fields. Besides selling vast quantities of American oil to pre-Soviet Russia, Rockefeller also had millions invested there. Thereafter, seeing an inevitable revolution looming on the horizon, Rockefeller also invested in anti-Tzarist forces to protect this branch of his empire. The Soviets did expropriate the Caspian oil fields from the Nobels and Rothschilds. Rockefeller’s National City Bank also lost assets, thanks to the revolution. Its lawyer, Joseph Proskauer, fought a legal battle to get Rockefeller’s money back. In 1926, Walter Teagle, the president of Standard Oil of New Jersey, successfully negotiated oil concessions in the Soviet Union.

By that time though, Standard Oil’s near global monopoly had been broken up. In 1911, the U.S. Supreme Court decided it was violating anti-trust laws and dissolved it into about three dozen companies. Many of these are now household names like Chevron (Standard Oil California), Amoco (Standard Oil Indiana), Mobil (Standard Oil New Jersey) and Exxon, previously called Esso (Standard Oil New Jersey).

When the U.S. was debating whether to join WWI, a group of so-called “War Hawks,” calling themselves the National Security League, knew that this war would be a major boon to profits. This League of bankers and industrialists, including Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, Coleman du Pont and H.H. Rodgers of Standard Oil, promoted increases in arms production and universal military training. By 1917, they had helped build war hysteria to a fever pitch. But not all Americans were on their side. The Woman’s Peace Party, many suffragists and others, strongly opposed America’s entry into WWI. However, the League was successful and the War Hawks’ profits skyrocketed.

Soon after WWI and the Russian revolution, many among America’s wealthy elite felt threatened by rising radicalism, particularly among unions. In April 1919, letter bombs, destined for John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan and others, were supposedly discovered in the U.S. postal system. The media quickly stirred up a massive Red Scare by blaming unions, communists, anarchists and foreign agitators. John Spivak says: “Trade unions were openly disbelieving and denounced with anger the so-called discoveries as a deliberate frame-up to provide excuses for more raids against organized labour” (A Man in His Time, 1967). This incident and others were used as pretexts for the Palmer Raids, during which the government rounded up more than ten thousand activists across the country.

Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, while the persecution of leftists continued, corporate leaders on the extreme right, continued their criminal rampages in pursuit of profit. Although Rockefeller’s many links to Nazism are too numerous to list here, a few examples are worth noting. In the 1920s, Exxon entered into partnerships with Germany’s top chemical cartel members, BASF and I.G. Farben. The Bank for International Settlements, which helped fund the Nazis before and during WWII, was created in 1930 by the world’s central banks, including the Federal Reserve Bank of NY. Its creation was inspired by the Nazi government and its bankers. Its first president was Gates McGarrah, a Rockefeller banker formerly of Chase National Bank and the “Fed.”

In 1932, Chevron struck oil in Bahrain and was soon operating in Saudi Arabia. In 1933, when Hitler seized power, Standard Oil New Jersey supplied Germany with the patents it required for tetraethyl lead aviation fuel. In 1936, the company Schroder, Rockefeller Investment Bankers, included board directors linked to the Gestapo and several European, Nazi-linked banks. It’s lawyers were John Foster Dulles and Allan Dulles, leading Wall Street fascists who drummed up American investments in Germany and elsewhere. The Dulles law firm represented I.G. Farben and Fritz Thyssen. Thyssen was Hitler’s biggest German financier. The Dulles brothers later became Secretary of State and CIA Director, respectively.

In 1937, John D. Rockefeller died, but his legacy of using oil money to grease the wheels of fascism continued. That year, as the Spanish Civil War raged, Texas Co. (later called Texaco) fueled Franco’s fascists. (In 1936, Texas Co. and Standard Oil California formed California Texas Oil (later Caltex) to combine Texas Co’s marketing network in the Middle East with Standard’s operations there.) Texas Co. also continued shipping oil to Germany during WWII. In 1938, Brown Brothers, Harriman, the Wall Street investment firm (with senior partners Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker) was involved in funding the supply of leaded gas for the Nazi Luftwaffe. Chevron and Texas Co. created Aramco in 1939, to pump Saudi oil for the Nazi war machine. In 1940, Texaco provided an office, in their Chrysler Building, for a Nazi intelligence officer, Dr. Gerhardt Westrick. Executives of Standard Oil’s German subsidiary were “Prominent figures of Himmler’s Circle of Friends of the Gestapo – its chief financiers – and close friends and colleagues of the Baron von Schroder” a leading Gesatpo officer and financier (Charles Higham, Trading with the Enemy). Just before WWII, the Rockefeller’s Chase Bank collaborated with the Nazi’s Schroder Bank to raise $25 million for Germany’s war economy. They also supplied the German government with names and background information on 10,000 fascist sympathizers in America. Throughout WWII, Rockefeller’s Chase Bank stayed open in Nazi-occupied Paris, providing services for Germany’s embassy and its businesses.

In 1943, Roosevelt’s government took control of Rockefeller’s Aramco. It also seized assets of the Union Banking Corp., which Harriman, Bush and Walker had built up by collaborating with Nazi companies that used slave labour. This money was later returned and it launched the Bushes in oil and politics.

In 1953, after an elected upstart named Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh nationalized Iran’s oil business, a UK/U.S.-backed coup returned the Shah to power. CIA Director Allan Dulles and his brother, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, were instrumental in this coup. Previously, Iran’s oil had been controlled by the Anglo-Persian Oil Co. (i.e., British Petroleum, BP) but after the U.S. role in this coup, U.S. companies got a 40% share and the top beneficiary was Standard Oil of New Jersey.

The next year, the Dulles boys were at it again orchestrating a coup in Guatemala. This one ushered in decades of fascist military governments that killed hundreds of thousands of innocents. But, it brought great profits for Rockefeller’s United Fruit Co., in which the Dulles were invested. Allen had also been on its Board of Trustees.

John D. Rockefeller would be happy to see the re-merging of his great monopoly. In 1988, Standard Oil merged with British Petroleum. Since then, other mergers have reunited many of his original oil companies. Exxon and Mobil reunited in 1999, to become the world’s top oil business. They made profits of $17.7 billion the next year. BP, merging with Amoco and Standard Oil Ohio, was number two that year and made profits of $12 billion.

J.D. Rockefeller’s philanthropy has been much lauded. Even as a student, he reportedly gave donations to his Baptist church and to foreign Sunday schools. By 1900, he offered to buy a whole church for Baptist preacher Thomas Dixon, a former, southern politician who was then flogging his white supremacist gospel in New York. But from the pulpit, Dixon’s fiery tirades against “creeping negroidism” didn’t reach enough people, so he took up writing respectable, romantic novels about the KKK. He churned out two dozen books. The Clansman, his race-baiting best seller, extolled the Klan’s role in redeeming the South. In 1915, it was made into a movie, called The Birth of a Nation. Endorsed by President Wilson, the film helped revive this dreaded terrorist organization.

Rockefeller’s great generosity was aimed largely at medical education, perhaps because of his father’s career and its peculiar contributions to medicine. J.D.Rockefeller, being a high school dropout, was not well-suited to his new role as godfather of the country’s centres for higher learning. His philanthropy was permeated with extremely racist views. In 1901, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research was created. In 1902, the General Education Board (GEB) began four decades of tremendously controversial influence over American schools and universities.

That same year, J.D. Rockefeller and Averell Harriman, a business partner of Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker in Brown Brothers Harriman, gave $11 million to create the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Built on Manhattan property owned by the Dulles brothers, it spawned America’s ground-breaking “eugenics” research and the world’s first “racial hygiene” laws. By 1907, Rockefeller funding was heavily influencing America’s medical institutions. The Rockefeller Institute created the first genetics lab in 1909. The following year, the Eugenics Research Association and the Eugenics Records Office were founded near Cold Spring Harbor, New York, on land donated by the widow of Averell Harriman. In 1911, John Foster Dulles summed up eugenics, saying that by eliminating “the weakest members of the population” a purer race could be created.

In 1928, Germany’s Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, Anthropology and Human Heredity was created. Run by Ernst Rudin, Hitler’s foremost “racial hygienist,” the institute’s main financing came from Rockefeller. Ironically, by 1936 an early psychiatrist at that institute, the half Jewish Dr. Franz Kallmann, had fled Nazism to America. According to Anton Chaitkin, Kallman’s experiments on 1,000 schizophrenics, published by the Freemasons, was used in 1939 to justify the Nazi’s mass murder of “mental patients and various ‘defective’ people.” Meanwhile, other Nazi doctors conducted incredibly cruel and vicious experiments on live, captive human subjects. Their body parts “were delivered to [Josef] Mengele, [Otmar] Verschuer and the other Rockefeller-linked contingent at the Wilhelm Institute.”


Edward Jay Epstein, Agency of Fear: Opiates and Political Power in America, 1977

John D. Rockefeller Page

Albert I. Berger, "William Avery Rockefeller of ND: The Father of the Man Who Founded Standard Oil and his Remarkable Double Life,"

Destination New Jersey: Sharing With Standard

Antony Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, 1981

Stephen Kinzer, "A Perilous New Contest for the Next Oil Prize," New York Times, Sept. 21, 1997

Elijah Zarwan, "Pipeline Politics," World Press Review, Nov.-Dec. 2001

Richard N. Draheim, Jr., "Oil and 'Socialism,'" The Dallas Libertarian, Feb 19, 1998.

Philip Mattera, "The Return of Windfall Profits: An Overview of the Oil Industry," Corporate Research E-Letter, Mar. 2001.

Texaco History

Yagmur Kochumov, "Issues of International Law and Politics in the Caspian in the Context of the Turkrnenistan-Azerbaijan Discussion and Fuel Transport," Caspian Crossroads, Winter 1999.

Caspian Projects II

Eva Sion, "From 1911 to 9/11: The Institutions of Conspiracy," The Tablet.

Marcelo Bucheli, The History of the United Fruit Company

Daniel Yergin, The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power, 1992.

Dixon, Thomas Jr.: 1864-1946, Writer

Wyn Craig Wade, The Fiery Cross, 1987

World War I War Hawks and the Passing of the Nineteenth Amendment

Dr. Len Horowitz, "The American Red Double-cross"

Source: Press for Conversion! magazine, Issue # 53, "Facing the Corporate Roots of American Fascism," March 2004. Published by the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade.


NEO – David Rockefeller’s Gruesome Legacy


Rockefeller Center, Carnegie Hall, and Eugenics


Was Nazi eugenics created in the US?




Death by Vaccination: The Gates Foundation and the New Eugenics – By Gary Null & Richard Gale

While lecturing at the elitist TED 2010 conference in Long Beach, CA,  Bill Gates slipped a statement while speaking on the dangers of climate change and over population: “Vaccines? I love them.”

Today the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is “the most powerful charity in the world, and one of the most quietly influential international organizations of any sort.”[1] The Foundation is funded to the tune of  $34.6 billion plus an additional $30 billion from Warren Buffet’s investments. This is almost the entire budget of the World Health Organization (WHO) …

In 2000, the Gates Foundation founded the International Finance Facility for Immunization (GAVI) and that organization’s Global Fund for Children’s Vaccines. GAVI is a global collaboration that includes governments, the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Bank, WHO, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers, UNICEF, vaccine makers, and other influential entities. All of these are zealot vaccination promoters …

We appear, therefore, to be faced with a serious uncertainty over the public image of the very likable, mild-manner Bill Gates, who expresses repeatedly his ambition to improve the health of the developing world, and then the possibility of other ulterior motives that are contrary to saving lives. Should we take Gates and his Foundation’s word that their primary objective is to improve the health and well-being of children in poorer nations by fighting disease and illness with vaccines? Or is his vaccine agenda another ruse with a more sinister agenda? For example, it is hard to imagine that Gates is unaware that his commitment to the Green Revolution is in point of fact a Green Disaster and that no GMO has lived up to its promise. Yet he simply continues his enormous funding of agricultural genetic manipulation projects. Therefore, we believe there is sound reason that his Foundation’s many international vaccine initiatives represent much more than excessively kind-hearted charity …

In his deconstruction of Bill Gates’ charitable agenda, F. William Engdahl writes, “Vaccinating a child who then goes to drink feces-polluted river water is hardly healthy in any respect. But of course cleaning up the water and sewage systems of Africa would revolutionize the health conditions of the Continent.”[9]  Far more effective would be the Foundation donating its billions to improve sanitation and hygiene, and provide nutrition to the 2.6 billion people who have none, for increasing clean water sources so 900 million global residents can have access to drinkable water (now at 1 in 3 Africans). Instead, the Foundation could be funding thousands of health clinics focusing on the chronic illnesses these populations suffer from most.[10]  This is simply common sense. “Bad water,” says the Stockholm International Water Institute’s director, Anders Bentell, “kills more people than HIV, malaria and war together.” Spending billions of dollars to develop new vaccines and launch monumental efforts to vaccinate  African children plagued with diverse infectious illnesses promises to be a fruitless enterprise while these populations continue to live in squalor …

As a keynote speaker at the TED 2010 conference, Gates laid out his rationale for an international effort towards global depopulation.  He said, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [projected to 9 billion people by 2050] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.“  New vaccines for depopulation? …

As early as 1968, the Rockefeller Foundation’s annual report recommended anti-fertility vaccines as a viable means for lessening the human population growth rate that should be aggressively pursued …

An early anti-fertility trial using human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a hormone essential for pregnancy, in vaccines was completed in 1988 in India through a Rockefeller collaboration with India’s National Institute of Immunology. The Rockefeller annual report declared success. Yet according to Betsy Hartman, Director of Hampshire College’s Population and Development Program, “although one vaccine has been tested on only 180 women in India, it is being billed there as safe, devoid of any side effects and completely reversible.” …

Perhaps the most thorough documented investigation into the covert use of anti-fertility vaccines is a 1995 report, “Are New Vaccines Laced with Birth Control Drugs,” compiled by J.A. Miller, a correspondent for the pro-life missionary movement Human Life International. In the early 1990s, the WHO, supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Bank, the UN Development Programme, and the US’s National Institutes of Health undertook stealth anti-fertility initiatives under the disguise of tetanus vaccination programs. These vaccines were administered to unsuspecting and poor communities in Mexico, Nicaragua and the Philippines …

A 1995 BBC documentary, “The Human Laboratory,” interviewed Filipino women’s activist Mary Pilar Verzosa, who reported on the vaccine’s adverse effects. These included fertility cycles that were “all fouled up,” spontaneous bleeding and miscarriages.[20] Seemingly, women were not screened to determine whether or not they were pregnant before injections. Consequently in addition to interfering with a woman’s ability to become pregnant the WHO was launching a clandestine experiment to observe whether the vaccine would trigger miscarriages …

Bill Gates’ mission to protect poorer populations from disease through mass vaccination, his sense of urgency that the global population is too large and needs to be reduced, and his deep financial and collaborative enterprises with the oligarchic elite, health agencies and multilateral organizations with a past history of eugenic intentions and experimentation, make for a bizarre mix that raises serious questions about the truth behind his Foundation’s motives.

America has a long history of eugenic science through the first half of the twentieth century–John D. Rockefeller, Margaret Sanger, Paul Popenoe, Madison Grant and others. The names of the organizations and facilities they founded or supported tells the story. Andrew Carnegie’s Institute was the primary funder of the Eugenics Record Office that operated from the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories. The Laboratory was closed in 1944 after the public became aware of thousands sterilizations it oversaw …

So what are the lessons to be learned from this? The wealthiest elite on the planet are rarely questioned about the correctness of their actions and schemes. As long as one of these individuals say they are giving huge sums of money to a cause to end disease and suffering, we are not suppose to probe further. Rather, in the case of mainstream media, such people are to be worshiped as saviors. The oligarchic elite are so well interconnected on multiple boards of directors, clubs for the rich and powerful, think tanks, and among the high ranks of elected legislators and politicians that it is difficult to have an open and honest debate on the merits of their actions and spending. When a Ted Turner says we should reduce the world’s population by more than half, and Bill Gates suggests a 15 percent reduction, do we really understand they are following a form of eugenic genocide?’

Read the Article


The 'Perfect Contraceptive': Eugenics and Birth Control Research in Britain and America in the Interwar Years


The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics


From Dystopia to Utopia: Nazi euthanasia/eugenics and their re-emergence


The Revitalized Eugenics Movement & the FDA’s Role


Unethical human experimentation in the United States


    1 Surgical experiments
    2 Pathogens, disease and biological warfare agents
        2.1 Late 19th century
        2.2 Early 20th century
        2.3 1940s
        2.4 1950s
        2.5 1960s
    3 Human radiation experiments
        3.1 Radioactive iodine experiments
        3.2 Uranium experiments
        3.3 Plutonium experiments
        3.4 Experiments involving other radioactive materials
        3.5 Fallout research
        3.6 Irradiation experiments
    4 Chemical experiments
        4.1 Nonconsensual tests
        4.2 Operation Top Hat
        4.3 Holmesburg program
    5 Psychological and torture experiments
        5.1 U.S. government research
            5.1.1 Truth serum
            5.1.2 Drug deaths
            5.1.3 MKUltra
            5.1.4 Experiments on patients with mental illness
            5.1.5 Torture experiments
        5.2 Academic research
    6 Pharmacological research
    7 Other experiments
    8 Legal, academic and professional policy
    9 See also
    10 References
        10.1 Notes
        10.2 Bibliography
    11 Further resources
        11.1 General
        11.2 Biological warfare and disease/pathogen experiments
        11.3 Human radiation experiments
            11.3.1 Books
            11.3.2 Government documents
            11.3.3 Journals
        11.4 Psychological/torture/interrogation experiments
        11.5 Video


Eugenics and the Rockefeller Foundation in Brazil: health as an instrument of national regeneration


In the first decades of the twentieth century, the work of the Rockefeller Foundation was decisive for the implementation of public health initiatives in Brazil, especially in the so-called public health movement. At that time, Brazilian eugenics was the same as public health, as expressed in the maxim "to sanitize is to eugenize". There are several studies discussing the public health movement, the issue of public health in Brazil, the Rockefeller Foundation, eugenics and its supporters. However, there is little discussion on the relationship between the Rockefeller Foundation and the Brazilian eugenics movement. It is worth to mention that although there are issues related to race, and theories on genetics and evolution, this work does not intend to examine these issues in depth. The aim was to recreate the scenario in which eugenics in general, and particularly in the Brazilian case, was developed, exposing the positions of some of the Brazilian eugenicists.


New Report Exposes Rockefeller Dynasty's Role in “Climate” Scam

An unfathomably wealthy banking and oil dynasty has been hijacking governments, media organs, universities, non-profits, and other power centers to expand its control over the economy and the energy sector in particular, according to a recently released investigation by a watchdog group. That dynasty, of course, is the Rockefeller family. In essence, they have largely created, bankrolled, and weaponized what is known as the “green” movement “as a means to expand their empire over the past three decades,” the report found.   

Under the guise of fighting alleged “man-made global-warming,” the Rockefeller family and its billions have been bankrolling everything from “climate” journalism (propaganda) efforts, politicians, and “academia” to politically motivated “investigations” of energy companies and non-profit organizations by government officials. Billionaire extremist George Soros also helped fund the efforts, according to the report by the Washington, D.C.-based watchdog Energy and Environment Legal Institute (E&E Legal) entitled The Rockefeller Way: The Family’s Covert “Climate Change” Plan.

The billionaires' goal, according to the report, was to crush the oil and gas industry, using government power as the weapon of choice, to ultimately gain greater control over the energy sector once again. “Not surprisingly, the Rockefellers are heavily invested in renewable energy,” the report explains, offering examples. But Rockefellers are no strangers to underhanded machinations to gain market share. Using extremely shady tactics, the report also details how John D. Rockefeller Sr., the founding patriarch of the Rockefeller dynasty, gained a virtual monopoly over the U.S. energy industry by the 1880s — at least until the feds broke it up into smaller companies.

However, the Rockefellers never went anywhere, using their massive wealth to accumulate massive amounts of power across society. And today, their agenda is almost certainly more nefarious than simply the greedy pursuit of total energy-market dominance. Indeed, the Rockefeller dynasty and its allies have a long track record of promoting tyranny and globalism using whatever pretext might be most convenient, whether that be the environment or anything else. The report by E&E Legal, a market-oriented environmentalist group, does a great service by highlighting some of the history of the Rockefeller dynasty's unbridled lust for power and control.

One of the key players involved in the latest phase of scam, whether wittingly or not, was New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. Seizing on Rockefeller-funded propaganda masquerading as “journalism” alleging that Exxon knew man-made “global warming” was supposedly real, the state attorney general joined with other states' chief prosecutors to launch the “AGs United for Clean Power.” As reported by The New American and other sources, the radical coalition of rogue prosecutors immediately began going after non-profit groups in what critics said was an outlandish attack on free speech, scientific inquiry, American jurisprudence, and basic common sense. Critics and legal experts blasted Schneiderman's group as a "criminal conspiracy" to deprive Americans of their rights.     

That scheme had its genesis in the summer of 2012, when two Rockefeller-funded climate-alarmist groups held a meeting in California. There, the Rockefellers' pawns and minions, including leading “climate” alarmists, plotted how best to demonize energy companies. “During the meeting, leading climate activists crafted a strategy to simultaneously target ExxonMobil through the criminal justice system and national media,” the report explains, noting that the agreed-upon tools to pursue that agenda included New York's Schneiderman and the largely Rockefeller-dominated Columbia “Journalism” School. The Rockefellers had also “long urged” Schneiderman to investigate Exxon, according to, ironically enough, a Rockefeller-funded “climate” propaganda organ run by a Rockefeller minion known as InsideClimate News.

Next came a January 2016 meeting at the Rockefeller Family Fund's headquarters that brought together key “climate” alarmists and political hacks to strategize. It was all organized and led by Rockefeller Family Fund Director Lee Wasserman and other statist radicals. The agenda of the secret meeting, according to a memo obtained by the Washington Free Beacon, was to wage war on oil companies. That would be pursued by, among other tactics, manufacturing a “scandal” by using a state prosecutor to get internal company documents, pushing efforts to have investors divest from oil companies, and applying as much political pressure as possible.

Ironically, among the goals outlined in a memo to attendees were the painting of Exxon as a “corrupt institution” in the public mind, a bid to “delegitimize” the company, and “to drive Exxon and climate into the center of the 2016 election.” They almost certainly could never have imagined that Exxon would indeed be in the center of the 2016 election — with the company's CEO, Rex Tillerson, officially nominated by president-elect Donald Trump for the powerful Secretary of State post.

Unfortunately for climate realists and skeptics tempted to laugh at the Rockefellers' failed scheme, though, Exxon and its chief have a long record of peddling climate alarmism, promoting ludicrous and totalitarian “solutions” to the alleged “problem” of CO2 (“gas of life”) emissions, and more. And of course, Exxon is actually a corporate member of the dangerous Council on Foreign Relations — a globalist and statist institution that also peddles climate alarmism and United Nations schemes, and is intimately tied to the Rockefeller dynasty. 

Basically, the Rockefeller clan is the head of the climate snake. “The Rockefeller family, whose track record of advancing the climate change agenda is unrivaled, appears to have orchestrated the simultaneous media and legal assaults against ExxonMobil,” the E&E Legal report concludes. “Through their financial influence, it is posited that the Rockefellers planned, coordinated, and subsidized the combined efforts of the Columbia Journalism School and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s investigation into ExxonMobil.”

But the worst may be yet to come if the schemes are not exposed and stopped. “The battering of ExxonMobil is only the beginning of a large, widespread, and coordinated effort to collapse the fossil fuel industry in the United States,” the report continued, pointing to e-mails from Schneiderman and his cohorts outlining a scheme to abuse the criminal justice system to “investigate” scientists and non-profit groups under fraud and anti-mafia RICO laws. (Conservative AGs noted that if “downplaying” supposed risks of alleged man-made global-warming is “fraud,” so is exaggerating the alleged risks.) 

“This oppressive infringement on constitutionally protected free speech is unprecedented, and demonstrates the lengths the climate change movement will go to force their narrative down the throats of the American people,” E&E Legal concluded. “When one follows the money, the major initiatives of the green movement always lead back to the usual suspects: activist billionaires such as the Rockefellers seeking control of the energy industry.”

According to the report, the Rockefellers' ambitions go far beyond energy, though. The family members “are intent on controlling nearly every major institution in America, using philanthropy as a means of increasing their influence on the world stage under the guise of advancing various social causes,” the report found. “Their avid opposition to the very fossil fuel industry that made John D. Rockefeller America’s first billionaire shows that the Rockefellers are not political ideologues. Instead, they are mere opportunists who support political agendas convenient to enhancing their leverage in the global arena.”

Indeed, the report notes that, through the Rockefellers’ sprawling web of “family foundations, universities, and institutions, as well as huge grants to other charities,” the dynasty has “gained unprecedented influence in healthcare, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, energy, and the environment.” And they are using these schemes to hijack and weaponize policy to benefit themselves, with a few exceptions who have publicly distanced themselves from the more prominent Rockefeller bosses.

“Their highly complex integration of hedge funds, interlocking boards positions, and non-profit organizations has steered public policy on these issues and provided them with foreknowledge of emerging markets and access to the developing world’s natural resources,” the report said, highlighting the Rockefeller fingerprints on everything from state and federal policies to UN social-engineering schemes such as Agenda 21. 

Considering the evidence, there can be little doubt that the Rockefeller cabal's exploitation of alleged man-made “global warming” as the justification for its totalitarian agenda is just that — a pretext for tyranny and greedy self-interest masquerading as environmental concerns. Indeed, even back during the discredited man-made global-cooling hysteria of the 1970s, when Obama's forced abortion-touting “Science Czar” John Holdren claimed global cooling would kill a billion people, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund was pushing the exact same anti-oil agenda.

In the organization's 1977 report The Unfinished Agenda: The Citizen's Policy Guide to Environmental Issues, for example, the Rockefeller outfit demanded, among other schemes, more population control measures, a “progressively increasing gasoline tax,” an “escalating tax on natural gas consumption,” and a “similar tax” to “be applied to all fossil fuels.” Similar schemes have been promoted by the dynasty ever since, though the ostensible justification for them has changed. 

Separately, the the Rockefeller Family Fund has long showered its largess on fringe “environmental” groups willing to spout the party the line ranging from the Environment Policy Institute and Friends of the Earth Foundation to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund. The Rockefeller Foundation has also donated to the NRDC, the anti-human Population Council, the World Resources Institute, and countless other “environmental” groups working to shackle humanity under the guise of “protecting” the “environment.”

Just since the year 2000, tax documents cited in the report show, the four primary Rockefeller foundations have showered tens of millions of dollars on “green” activist groups. Beneficiaries include the Energy Foundation, the Tides Foundation, the New America Foundation, the World Health Organization, the Wildlife Conservation Society, the National Resources Defense Council, the Alliance for Climate Protection, the Center for International Environmental Law, the Southern Environmental Law Center, and more.  

A U.S. Senate report exposing what lawmakers described as the “Billionaires Club” and its role in the “Green” movement also revealed, among other information, that the Rockefeller Foundation is among the largest donors to “environmental” causes in the United States. Much of the funding is routed through shady “pass through” entities such as the “Energy Foundation” to shower the billionaires' money on lobbyists and unsuspecting “green” useful-idiot activists while concealing the source of the funds. Some of the outfits that have benefited, according to the report, include the American Lung Association, the Blue Green Alliance, the Environmental Defense Fund, the League of Conservation Voters, the NDRC, the Sierra Club, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and more.

Another key financier of the green scam has been Soros, a protege of the unimaginably wealthy Rothschild dynasty who admitted on TV to having no guilt about helping the National Socialists (Nazis) steal Jewish property. Through his “Open Societies Foundations,” Soros has dumped billions into “green” outfits such as the Aspen Institute, Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, Green for All, the New America Foundation, Presidential Climate Action Project, the Tides Foundation, ClimateWorks Foundation, the Global Green Grants Fund, the NDRC, and more. Soros also bankrolled Schneiderman's political career, with the disgraced New York AG receiving more Soros loot than any other politician in the state.

But supposed Rockefeller concerns about the “environment” are almost certainly a ruse concealing more sinister motivations. The real agenda is more establishment control over humanity, less freedom, and a globalist system of governance. Indeed, billionaire extremist David Rockefeller, the dynasty's current patriarch, has revealed his true totalitarian colors on multiple occasions. In his 2002 autobiography Memoirs, for example, he boasts of being a conspirator working against America in favor of a one-world system.  

“Some even believe we [the Rockefellers] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will,” Rockefeller explains in his book. “If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Before that, he showered praises on the most murderous dictatorship to plague humanity in all of recorded history. “Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded, not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering a high morale and community purpose,” Rockefeller claimed in a 1973 New York Times piece about a psychopath's “revolution” that murdered tens of millions of people in cold blood. “The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” It is no surprise that leading climate alarmists agree.

Late Hollywood filmmaker Aaron Russo, a longtime friend of Nick Rockefeller, also revealed what the dynasty was up to. After being invited by Rockefeller to join the Council on Foreign Relations, Russo refused. “The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole society, to have the bankers and the elite people control the world,” Russo said Rockefeller had told him, adding that the establishment wanted to track and control everyone on the planet.

As American citizens, the Rockefellers have a constitutionally protected right to speak freely, even to promote kooky, absurd, dangerous, deadly, and totalitarian ideas to enrich themselves. However, the “mainstream” media also have a duty to expose the dynasty's totalitarian machinations, and they have so far failed miserably. Meanwhile, members of the political class have sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution, which specifically prohibits much of the Rockefellers' self-serving totalitarian agenda from being implemented.

As the man-made global-warming theory implodes amid decades with no warming, and the theory's backers are left with egg all over their faces, it is time for Americans and perhaps even Congress to take a more serious look at the Rockefeller machine. In addition to the “climate” scam, the Rockefellers have bankrolled everything from racist eugenics and abortion to the deliberate dumbing down of the American people via so-called “education.” It is time for the light to be shined on their machinations.  

Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, education, politics, and more. He can be reached at Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU.

Photo: Rockefeller Center in New York City

Related articles:

Rockefellers Fund Global-warming Protests as Earth Cools

Lawless "Billionaire Club" Behind Green Scam, Senate Study Finds

Prosecutors Persecuting Climate Skeptics Busted Hiding Records

Catholic Show Exposes Rockefeller Assault on Church, Life 

"Earth Day" — The Greatest Sham on Earth

Taxpayers, Rockefellers Fund “Sustainable” Plot to Undermine Market

Billionaire Crony Tom Steyer Buys Democrats to Boost “Green” Investments

State AGs in “Criminal Conspiracy” to Persecute Climate Skeptics

The Real Green in Fedgov’s “Green Energy”

Climate Alarmists Have Been Wrong About Virtually Everything

New Film Exposes Communist Roots of “Sustainability” Agenda

Prosecutors: Exaggerating Climate Risks Might be Fraud

The Real Agenda Behind UN “Sustainability” Unmasked

Climate Alarmists Push Chinese Communism, Population Control

Climate Scientist: “Global Warming Nazis” Threaten Humanity


David Rockefeller & a dark legacy in Brasil – A critical obituary

On March 20, David Rockefeller died at the age of 101. As the obituaries for one of the world’s richest men gush over his philanthropy, it needs to be pointed out that he was a major player in several Latin American coups, supported extremely corrupt military dictatorships, post-dictatorship neoliberal policies that greatly exacerbated income stratification and poverty and that his dark legacy will continue to influence the region long after his death.

The Rockefellers’ arrival in Brazil

The Rockefeller Foundation first arrived in Brazil during World War I and was embedded within the so-called “public health movement” amongst Brazilian elites. At that time, Brazilian eugenics was synonymous with public health and emphasized “hygienization”, expressed in the maxim “to sanitize is to eugenize”. With Rockefeller assistance, the creation of the Eugenic Society of São Paulo in 1918 represented the institutionalization of eugenics in Brazil. Amongst elites, eugenics was associated with evolution, progress and civilization, even treated by some as a ‘new religion’. In “War against the weak” Edwin Black explains that the purpose of the Rockefeller Foundation was to finance programs aimed at “the extermination of those considered degenerate”. In Brazil this meant the poor, the ignorant, those of mixed race and African descent.

In her thesis on David’s older brother Nelson Rockefeller, historian Elisabeth Cobbs argues that U.S. Foreign policy in Brazil was not only realised by official relations between governments and diplomats, but also by the private sector, including philanthropic organisations. Nelson had been a regular visitor to Brazil since the 1930s, and in 1941 was named by President Roosevelt as coordinator of the Office of Interamerican Affairs (CIAA), which ran intelligence and propaganda operations against the Axis Powers in Latin America.

Following the end of the War, Nelson headed the American International Association for Economic and Social Development in Brazil of AIA. The AIA was a “Capitalist Missionary” philanthropic NGO known in Brazil for its programmes for modernisation of agriculture to North American models and standards (including the introduction of pesticides, herbicides and hybrid seeds), sanitation, and literacy. AIA would eventually birth two more agencies, IBEC (International Basic Economy Company) and the IRI Research Institute. As coordinator of the CIAA, Nelson acquired invaluable information about Latin America’s untapped natural resources, especially mineral reserves, information that he would go on to use following the war. IBEC became a key component in the post-World War Two opening of the Amazon rainforest to commercial exploitation, “a process that eventually led to military dictatorships, genocide of native peoples, loss of biological diversity and unprecedented misery for the majority of Brazilians“.

The Cold War increased pressures on Brazil regarding Oil exploration concessions. President Getúlio Vargas was said to have tried to address this by forming a consortium, with the participation of Standard Oil, Shell and the Brazilian State. Shell is reported to have accepted the idea, but Standard Oil and Chase Bank opposed. Standard Oil would instead coerce using threats to Brazil’s Coffee exports – the Rockefeller group controlled the American Coffee Corporation, which bought most of Brazil’s coffee, processed it and distributed to the United States.

In the 1950s David Rockefeller & Chase became more active in Brazil, creating Interamerican Finance & Investments, only to sell their shares in 1956 as the political climate turned against Internationalisation. In 1961 he tried to set up a Chase affiliate bank in Brazil, buying 51% of Banco Lar for $3m dollars, but Chase were discouraged due to the political instability in the country. (In 1980 he was cleared by the Central Bank to buy the remaining shares, and this entity finally became Brazil’s Chase).

During this period, along with his brother Nelson, David developed a very close friendship with partner and boss of Unibanco (later merged with Itau) Walther Moreira Salles, whose family made a second fortune from the ultra-rare mineral Niobium. Together, the Rockefellers and Moreira Salles would purchase a massive Farm, “Bodoquena”, in the state of Mato Grosso.

In the early 1960s on the instruction of President Kennedy, David Rockefeller founded the Business Group for Latin America, which was intended to help counter the spread of leftist governments in the region following the Cuban revolution. Under his leadership, it subsequently transformed into the Council of the Americas and finally AS/COA, which currently publishes Americas Quarterly, a relatively discreet but influential nucleus of anglophone “Free Trade” policy discourse on Latin America.

The Business Group for Latin America included on its board senior executives such as C. Jay Parkinson, CEO of Anaconda Copper – which had a strong presence in Chile, and Harold Geneen, head of the International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (ITT), also heavily involved in the country, and Donald M. Kendall, CEO of PepsiCo. All of these firms supported the intervention of Nixon and Kissinger against elected President Salvador Allende, in 1973.

In 1970, covert CIA schemes against Allende included a $500,000 contingency plan to influence the congressional vote against his candidacy. His opponent Alessandri was to be given around half a million dollars, to be raised by ITT and other companies within the Business Group. According to Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Rockefeller’s Business Group for Latin America, which was transformed in 1970 into the Council of the Americas, had a close relationship with the CIA and Enno Hobbing, who had participated in the overthrow of Arbenz in Guatemala. Hobbing, a CIA official who had initially been assigned as liaison to the Business Group, eventually left the CIA and became the principal operations officer for the Council of the Americas.

Countless academics have written about economic sabotage, often in cooperation with US business elites such as the Rockefeller family, as a component of US-backed coups in Latin America. From the ITT orchestrated Chilean copper boycott of 1972 to the Reagan administration’s economic destabilization of Nicaragua, to US efforts to sabotage the Venezuelan economy, progressive populism is to this day frequently met with US aggression, including media propaganda.

David Rockefeller and the Brazilian Military Dictatorship

Jan K. Black’s “United States Penetration of Brazil” contains numerous passages related to the activities of Rockefeller Group, the Business Group of Latin America and its precursors in the 1962 Election, the Coup of 1964 and period that followed, in connivance with local conservative elites.  She documents how, at a Military conference on Latin America at West Point in the fall of 1964, David Rockefeller said that it had been decided quite early that Goulart was not acceptable to the U.S. banking community, and that he would “have to go.” As in 2016, in 1964 the foreign emphasis was not on marxist ideology, but on combating economic and resource nationalism.

“The assertion of national control over basic natural resources, as well as a more general assertion of control over the productive capacity of the economy, had been seen by the Goulart government as a prerequisIte to the redistribution of income. The advocacy of economic nationalism had also been seen as one of the most promising means of mobilizing mass support for the government. U.S. businesses, with the support of the U.S. Government, had generally been able to fend off the constraints of nationalistic but weak governments. If the mobilization of the masses had not appeared to be a threat or a possibility, It seems likely that the combined pressures of the multinational corporations and those elements of the Brazilian business community whose fortunes were linked to them would have been sufficient to intimidate the Brazilian government into backing down on its nationalistic designs. But regardless of the actual potential in 1964 for the mobilization of the masses, Goulart apparently believed that it was possible: and his enemies, foreign and domestic, apparently feared that he was right.”

In 1975, former CIA agent Philip Agee confirmed many of the findings and suspicions of a Brazilian congressional commission into Foreign interference in Brazil’s 1962 Election. The investigation revealed that of the (CIA) Rio Station’s main political-action operations, the Brazilian Institute for Democratic Action (IBAD) and a related organisation called Democratic Action (ADEP):

“…spent during the 1962 electoral campaign at least the equivalent of some 12 million dollars financing anticommunist candidates, and possibly as much as 20 million….The parliamentary investigating commission was controlled somewhat-five of its nine members were themselves recipients of IBAD and ADEP funds-but only the refusal of the First National City Bank, the Bank of Boston, and the Royal Bank of Canada to reveal the foreign source of funds deposited for IBAD and ADEP kept the lid from blowing off.  Beneficiaries of IBAD were prominent among the conspirators in the coup of 1 April and some, particularly military beneficiaries, were among who gained power as a consequence of it….Robinson Rojas listed Standard Oil of New Jersey, U.S. Steel, Texas Oil, Gulf Oil, Hanna Corporation, Bethlehem Steel, General Motors, and Willys Overland among the depositors in the accounts of IBAD-ADEP-Promotion”. Economist & Environmentalist Jean Marc von der Weid maintained that “more than one hundred foreign enterprises and some national ones were involved in financing the institute, and that the Rockefeller Group-IBEC was one of the major benefactors.”

The CIA’s “point man” in the 1964 Coup was Joseph Caldwell King, also known by his CIA code name of Oliver G. Galbond. He was former vice president of Business Group member Johnson & Johnson, in charge of Brazil & Argentina, and from there he moved to his close friend Nelson Rockefeller’s Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs (OCIAA). After officially leaving the CIA in 1967, King became CEO of ‘Amazon Natural Drug Company’, a CIA front which was collecting organic material from the rainforest for Rockefeller Foundation-funded research by US Agencies.

Brazil’s hegemonic media network, Rede Globo, was actually created with the assistance and funding of Rockefeller-associated Time-Life Publishing in the United States. It became a powerful instrument of societal control during the dictatorship following its launch in 1964.

Gerard Colby & Charlotte Dennett’s ‘Thy will be done: The Conquest of the Amazon’ was an investigation into the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL), also known as the Wycliffe Bible Translators – a Rockefeller & USAID funded Evangelical organisation which had been translating the Bible into hundreds of indigenous languages in Central and South America. Wycliffe was founded by ultraconservative William Cameron Townsend who worked in tandem with Rockefeller and which the authors accuse of destroying indigenous peoples’ cultural values to abet penetration by U.S. businesses, employing a “virulent brand of Christian fundamentalism that used linguistics to undermine the social cohesion of indigenous communities and accelerate their assimilation into Western culture”. It sent scores of missionaries and establishing churches to counter the “threat” of Left-Wing “Liberation Theology” to United States Security, identified by older brother Nelson in his 1969 ‘Rockefeller Report’ for President Nixon. These missionaries also acted as scouts, covertly surveying the Amazon for resources. Financial support for Evangelical faith in Brazil evidently extends to the present, with the massive and politically influential Pentecostal “Universal Church of the Kingdom of God” whose head Bishop, Edir Macedo told his followers that the Rockefellers had been generous contributors.

David and Nelson Rockefeller along with Zbigniew Brzezinski were also involved in the drafting of Henry Kissinger’s “National Security Study Memorandum 200” in 1974, which President Ford, to whom Nelson was serving as Vice, made official United States policy. The once secret NSSM-200, which was first seen by researchers in the 1990s, is a chilling document which advocates forced population control in 13 “Less Developed Countries”, one of which was Brazil, countries chosen for the strategic importance of their natural resources. The study states that “the world is increasingly dependent on mineral supplies from developing countries, and if rapid population frustrates their prospects for economic development and social progress, the resulting instability may undermine the conditions for expanded output and sustained flows of such resources.”

It goes on to conclude that “Whether through government action, labor conflicts, sabotage, or civil disturbance, the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized. Although population pressure is obviously not the only factor involved, these types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or zero population growth”, and “Young people, who are in much higher proportions in many LDCs, are likely to be more volatile, unstable, prone to extremes, alienation and violence than an older population. These young people can more readily be persuaded to attack the legal institutions of the government or real property of the ‘establishment,’ ‘imperialists,’ multinational corporations, or other-often foreign-influences blamed for their troubles”.

Such mandatory population control programmes would be implemented by Non Governmental Organisations such as the Rockefeller’s own Eugenicist Population Council. In 1968, Frederick Osborn, the organisation’s first president, said “Eugenic goals are most likely to be achieved under another name than eugenics.”

The implications of the NSSM-200 document for Brazilians cannot be understated. It can be interpreted that de-facto opposition to population growth, rises to living standards & life expectancy, availability of quality public education and healthcare, and independent development in Brazil, has been effectively codified into United States foreign policy since 1975.


Two decades after a Military Dictatorship took power with his support, in 1987 following transition to Civilian Rule, David Rockefeller remarked “In all my visits to Brazil, I have never before come across such desperate poverty”.

In June 1992 he was back in Brasilia. “The progress is encouraging and the road is open to an accord” he said, after a 45-minute meeting with corruption-hit President Fernando Collor de Mello at the Planalto Palace in the capital. Though by this point Rockefeller was only a consultant at Chase Manhattan, he was still involved in the Council of the Americas. The New York Times wrote that Brazil was seeking to convert its world record $108bn debt into 30-year bonds that would be backed by the United States Treasury. Born into an Oligarchic family, Collor had come to power in 1989 via the first direct election since the 1964 Coup, as Rede Globo’s anointed candidate. One of his leftist rivals Leonel Brizola, had been identified as the potential target for a U.S.-supported Coup d’etat should he have won. By the end of 1992, Collor, who had overseen a programme of rapid privatisation and economic liberalisation, resigned, facing imminent impeachment, with inflation standing at over 1000%. In dealing directly with Collor, Rockefeller ensured that debt-deals were set in stone before any change in Presidency.

During preparations for the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Rockefeller Foundation created LEAD (Leadership in the Environment and Development). According to their website they have since then “been recruiting talented individuals from key sectors and professions all over the world to be part of a growing network now standing at over 2400 leaders, who are committed to changing the world. […] Since 1992, more than 500 professionals have been trained in Brazil, Canada, China, Former Soviet Union, Europe, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan and South Africa.” The Brazilian branch of LEAD (ABDL) was one of the first, founded in mid-1991.  Al Binger, LEAD’s international director, said with surprising frankness: “We hope that in ten years many of the fellows will be acting as ministers of environment and development, university rectors and CEOs.”. One of the Brazilian Politicians most closely associated with LEAD/ABDL would be future Presidential Candidate & environmental campaigner, Marina Silva. Silva was Catholic Liberation Theologist, and social movement leader for almost two decades, converting to Evangelical faith in the mid 1990s. Although widely hailed as an environmentalist leader in the anglophone media, her public support of “green capitalism” is not only rejected by the Brazilian environmentalist movement, it’s rejection was chosen as the theme to the Cupula dos Povos, the international alternative forum to Rio+20, held simultaneously with it in Rio de Janeiro in 2012.

“A bridge to the future”

AS/COA (Americas Society / Council of the Americas) magazine Americas Quarterly and its circle of promoted commentariat have been a major player in reshaping the master narrative of Brazil as a failing state, that Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment was legitimate, and in particular the depiction of Lava Jato judge Sergio Moro as objective “anti-corruption crusader”. There is a also a common rhetorical dismissal of U.S. interference in modern Latin America as being a relic of the cold war.

Shortly after the illegitimate impeachment of predecessor Dilma Rousseff, on September 22 2016, documented U.S. informant, new President Michel Temer, who was visiting the United States to meet Vice President Joe Biden and address the UN, also spoke at a specially-organised meeting at the New York headquarters of AS/COA . At the meeting for Investors, Business and Banking elites, Temer candidly revealed an “open secret” – that the true purpose of Rousseff’s removal was that she would not agree to implement a hardline Austerity & Privatisation programme contained within a policy document called “Bridge to the Future“.

The document was odd in that it appeared to have been translated from English, with social media users remarking on its unusual wording. Economist Marcio Pochmann noted similarities between “Bridge to the Future” and the “Government Economic Action Plan” (PAEG) which followed the Coup of 1964. One such similarity, he says, is the strong international influence.

“PAEG was written in English, there was great American intervention in the country, so much so that the US supported the dictatorship and even sent a ship in case of civil war. The coup of 2016 also has undeniable US interests in relation to a series of developmental moves the country had made since 2003, as it sought greater autonomy in Brazilian foreign policy. The South-South relationship and the strengthening of the BRICs (Trade Bloc formed by Brazil, Russia, India and China)is different from what the US considers to be the best for Latin America.”

Former Dictatorship-era Public Security Official Michel Temer was also asked by one attendee what plans he had to deal with social unrest amongst the population in response to such extreme austerity measures. This too echoes 1964, in “Who Rules the World“, Chomsky noted that the Kennedy administration’s policy was to transform Latin America’s Militaries into glorified police forces, designed to deal with their own populations “should they raise their heads”, not external threats.

Despite the shocking nature of Temer’s comments, they were for the most part ignored by close-knit Brazil-based corporate journalists, but to those who have been following the US-led rollback against democratically elected center-left and left leaders in Latin America, it was no coincidence that Temer admitted this at a meeting sponsored & organised by AS/COA.

AS/COA is effectively a Latin America equivalent of the Atlantic Council and its slogan is “Uniting opinion leaders to exchange ideas and create solutions to the challenges of the Americas today” and its online biographies state: “Americas Society (AS) Is the premier forum dedicated to education, debate, and dialogue in the Americas. Its mission is to foster an understanding of the contemporary political, social, and economic issues confronting Latin America, the Caribbean, and Canada, and to increase public awareness and appreciation of the diverse cultural heritage of the Americas and the importance of the inter-American relationship.”, “Council of the Americas (COA) Is the premier international business organisation whose members share a common commitment to economic and social development, open markets, the rule of law, and democracy throughout the Western Hemisphere. The Council’s membership consists of leading international companies representing a broad spectrum of sectors, including banking and finance, consulting services, consumer products, energy and mining, manufacturing, media, technology, and transportation.”

The organisation is said to be based on the “fundamental belief that free markets and private enterprise offer the most effective means to achieve regional economic growth and prosperity.” Membership has grown to over 200 blue chip companies that represent the majority of U.S. private investment in Latin America. The Council hosts presidents, cabinet ministers, central bankers, government officials, and leading experts in economics, politics, business, and finance, which gives it unique access to information from the region. The Council of the Americas argues that “free markets and private enterprise offer the most effective means to achieve regional economic growth”. It has been a supporter of free trade agreements and has been instrumental in the conception of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA)….and the yet to be implemented Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), the long-held ambition of David Rockefeller himself. Meanwhile, sister organisation The Americas Society’s focus is in contrast “to increase public awareness and appreciation of the diverse cultural heritage of the Americas and the importance of the inter-American relationship”

Elite COA corporate members include: Bloomberg, Blackrock, Bank of America, Barings, Barrick Gold Corporation, Boeing, Bombardier, Banco Bradesco, Banco do Brasil, Banco Santander, Cisco, Citigroup, Coca Cola, ExxonMobility, Ford, General Electric, General Motors, Google, Itaú Unibanco, IBM, Johnson & Johnson, JP Morgan Chase, Lockheed Martin, McDonalds, Moody’s, Morgan Stanley, Microsoft, News Corp / Fox, Pearson, Pfizer, Philip Morris, Raytheon, Shell, Television Association Of Programmers Latin America, Time Warner/Turner, Toyota, Viacom, Wal-Mart.  One of the successor companies to Standard Oil, Chevron Corporation is listed as “Patron Corporate Member” of Council of the Americas, and has a strong vested interest in who governs Brazil. David Rockefeller remained Honorary Secretary of COA until the day he died, while current Secretary is William R. Rhodes, formerly of Citibank/Citigroup.

Alongside other D.C. Think Tanks such as the older Brookings, and Rockefeller/Ford funded Council on Foreign Relations, AS/COA is not unusual in its stated function but is a particularly interesting case – an interface between State & Corporate power, Intelligence communities, Multinational & Latin American Banks, Washington-aligned Neoliberal Politicians, educational institutions such as FGV, local & international NGOs, Authors, Journalists, and everyday English-language media from the region, such as Reuters and CNN.

David Rockefeller once said, “American capitalism has brought more benefits to more people than any other system in any part of the world at any time in history. ” He may have passed away, but his imperialist business interests and his think tank, backed by some of the World’s most nefarious corporations in terms of human and environmental rights, will no doubt continue to meddle and weaken democracy in Latin America for years to come.


A Century Ago: Rockefellers Funded Eugenics Initiative to Sterilize 15 Million Americans


David Rockefeller

Heir to the immense Rockefeller family fortune, David Rockefeller is a psychopathic old man who wants to reduce the world's population. He's the man behind both Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger, two mass murderers, and uses him money to fund China's one child policy. In his earlier days he used to meet with people like Saddam Hussein, but now he lets others do that for him. His family is responsible for the rise of eugenics, by funding Nazi scientists. Nowadays he continues his families heritage by going to the Bilderberg meetings every year, where he determines the coarse of the planet for the following year, together with other influential people, like the Rothschild and Warburg families, Royal families of Europe, and the heads of the biggest banks and oil companies.
Wow, I just went to UD, and found out about this evil man, called David Rockefeller.


{We cannot trust the Rockefellers with the DNA of the white race.
For all we know, the Rockefellers might be Jewish, and we see how
articles say that the Rockefellers are trying to reduce both the
white race and other races. Many have accused the New World Order
type system of trying to attempt to create an one world Jewish race}.



     What is the Council on Foreign Relations?

Policies debated at the CFR almost always become US foreign policy. Very little is known about it; political scientists pay scant attention to it. Why? And does it matter that the CFR was created by the leaders of the eugenics movement?

Table of Contents

The CFR: An Introduction

  Who is behind the CFR?

  The eugenics ideology of CFR leaders

  The Rockefellers
  Andrew Carnegie
  Henry Ford and J.P. Morgan
  Woodrow Wilson

 Now, what does this help us explain?

  US foreign policy in the years after the creation of the CFR
  Why don’t political scientists investigate the CFR?
  A note about the stability of institutional ideology
  What does the future hold for Israel?

The CFR: An introduction

In 1977 political scientist Thomas Dye delivered his presidential address to the Southern Political Science Association at the University of California at Santa Cruz. His topic: the role of allegedly ‘private’ policy-making organizations in determining US policy. His address was then published in 1978 as a research paper in The Journal of Politics, and much space was devoted to the importance of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in the making of United States foreign policy.[1] All around, this was a rare event that helped correct a failing identified by sociologist G. William Domhoff in his 1970 book, The Higher Circles: The Governing Class in America: “there never has been any research paper on [the CFR] in any scholarly journal indexed in the Social Science and Humanities Index.”[2]

Many political scientists, apparently, thought this was a proper state of affairs and wanted matters to remain thus, because Dye wrote in the first page: “I appreciate the assistance of G. William Domhoff, University of California, Santa Cruz. I apologize to those eminent political scientists who told me that [studying] the activities of private policymakers was not ‘political science.’ ”[3]

It is noteworthy that “eminent political scientists” should be opposed to research on the Council on Foreign Relations and other supposedly ‘private’ policy organizations. Why are they? To answer this question is to open a panoramic window into the structure of the US system. But, as usual, that requires doing some historical research. This is the task before us.

The first order of business is to get a sense for what the CFR is and give some context to evaluate Dye’s use of the phrase “private policymakers” in reference to this and similar organizations. In his paper, Thomas Dye writes:

“Political scientist Lester Milbraith observes that the influence of [the] CFR throughout the government is so pervasive that it is difficult to distinguish CFR from government programs: ‘The Council on Foreign Relations, while not financed by government, works so closely with it that it is difficult to distinguish Council actions stimulated by government from autonomous actions.’”[4]

You could say it in the reverse direction, as well: it is difficult to distinguish government actions stimulated by the Council from autonomous government action. Dye gave a list of quite major US foreign policy initiatives which the CFR had led, “including both the initial decision to intervene militarily in Vietnam and the later decision to withdraw.”

Further, Dye pointed out that many important members of the CFR were simultaneously top government officeholders. For example, “Council members in the Kennedy-Johnson Administration included Secretary of State Dean Rusk, National Security Advisor McGeorge P. Bundy, CIA Director John McCone, and Under-Secretary of State George Ball.”[5] A list of important figures in the CFR over the years up to 1978, which Dye also provided, showed that many were former top officials in the United States Government.[6]

But the CFR is not merely where present and former officeholders meet; it is also an incubator for future officeholders. As William Domhoff observed:

“Douglass Cater, a journalist from Exeter and Harvard who served on the staff of President Lyndon B. Johnson, has noted that ‘a diligent scholar would do well to delve into the role of the purely unofficial Council on Foreign Relations in the care and breeding of an incipient American Establishment.’ ...Turning to the all-important question of government involvement… the point is made most authoritatively by John J. McCloy… director of CFR and a government appointee in a variety of roles since the early 1940s: ‘Whenever we needed a man,’ said McCloy in explaining the presence of CFR members in the modern defense establishment that fought World War II, ‘we thumbed through the roll of council members and put through a call to New York.’”[7]

In what sense, then, can we say that the CFR is private? Only in this narrow, technical sense: the money to support the CFR comes from private foundations and corporations.

It is obvious, now, why “[the] CFR was called by [Washington journalist Joseph] Kraft a ‘school for statesmen [which] comes close to being an organ of what C. Wright Mills has called the Power Elite -- a group of men, similar in interest and outlook, shaping events from invulnerable positions behind the scenes.’ ”[8] The financial backers of the CFR get to turn their views into policy without the scrutiny that would accompany running for office, under the cover of a supposedly ‘private’ organization.

The penumbra in which the CFR operates obscures not only the process of foreign policy-making in the United States, but in the Western world as a whole. Thomas Dye writes:

“A discussion of the CFR would be incomplete without some reference to its multi-national arm -- the Trilateral Commission. The Trilateral Commission was established by CFR board Chairman David Rockefeller in 1972, with the backing of the Council and the Rockefeller Foundation. The Trilateral Commission is a small group of top officials of multi-national corporations and governmental leaders of industrialized nations, who meet periodically to coordinate policy among the United States, Western Union, and Japan.”[9]

Given all this, it seems important, the better to understand what the CFR is and what it’s for, to shine some light on the shadows in which it quietly sits. I will explain who finances the CFR, and what their ideological views appear to be.

Who is behind the CFR?

In their book on the Rockefeller family, Peter Collier and David Horowitz write:

“In 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations was formed by leaders of finance and industry, men like Thomas W. Lamont, [Woodrow] Wilson’s financial advisor and senior partner in the House of Morgan, and John W. Davis, a Morgan lawyer, standard-bearer for the Democratic party in [the presidential election of] 1924, and a trustee of the Rockefeller foundation. [John D. Rockefeller] Junior and the Rockefeller philanthropies were also drawn into the early funding of the council, whose charter members included not only Rockefeller’s business and social friends but Fosdick and Jerome Greene from his inner circle of advisors.”[10]

It is a mistake for Collier & Horowitz to write that “the Rockefeller philanthropies were also drawn into the early funding of the council.” In fact, the Rockefeller Foundation has continued to be involved with the funding.

And this foundation is not alone. In 1970 William Domhoff wrote that “As to the foundations, the major contributors over the years have been the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation, with the Ford Foundation joining in with a large grant in the 1950s. According to [Joseph] Kraft, a $2.5 million grant in the early 1950s from the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations made the Council ‘the most important single private agency conducting research in foreign affairs.’ In 1960-61, foundation money accounted for 25% of CFR income.”[11] (The rest comes from corporations and from sales of Foreign Affairs.)

We have seen above Thomas Dye explaining that the Rockefeller Foundation backed financially the creation of the CFR’s Trilateral Commission in 1972, and David Rockefeller himself spearheaded the effort. David Rockefeller had become chairman of the Council in 1970 and he retained the post until 1985. The Rockefellers and their foundations have remained very much involved in the CFR.

We see, then, that the Council on Foreign Relations was formed by people from the circles of Woodrow Wilson, J.P. Morgan, and the Rockefellers. The Council has been funded by money from the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations, and then also by the Ford Foundation. The question we may pose, then, is: Do these various interests have anything dramatic and telling in common? The answer is yes: they were all backers of the eugenics movement.

The eugenics ideology of CFR leaders

I used to do the following experiment with my college students at the University of Pennsylvania, an Ivy League school: I would ask them to raise their hand if they had heard of the eugenics movement. Nothing moved. These were among the best educated students anywhere in the country, and yet they were like most of their fellow US citizens: they knew nothing, or next to nothing, about eugenics.

The cause of this is not exactly a mystery: discussion of eugenics is almost entirely absent from high school and university curricula in the United States, and the scarce mentions of it are denuded of the most important content. And yet the eugenics movement achieved great prominence and influence especially in the United States. The silence on it is therefore shocking. And politically relevant.

American eugenics—now almost unknown—was easily the most important social and political movement of the first half of the 20th c. Why? Because American eugenics was responsible for the German Nazi movement, and therefore for World War II and the Holocaust. You read correctly.

The eugenics ideology has the following main components:

1)    it claims that Germanic stock—the so called ‘white Aryan’ or ‘Nordic race’—is biologically superior

2)    it proposes that Germans ought to rule the world as a ‘master race’; and

3)    it wishes to curtail the political liberties and reproduction of ‘inferiors,’ ‘defectives,’ and ‘degenerates’; at the limit, it seeks to exterminate them.

In his detailed study of the American eugenics movement, War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race (published in 2003), historian Edwin Black writes:

“In 1916, [American eugenicist] Madison Grant’s The Passing of the Great Race declared that the white Nordic race was destined to rule the world, and confirmed the Aryan people’s role in it. German nationalists were heartened by America’s recognition of Nordic and Ayran racial superiority. Reviews of the book inspired a spectrum of German scientists and nationalists to think eugenically even before the work was translated into German.

…[American eugenics leader] Harry Laughlin prepared a detailed pro-German speech for the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Eugenics Research Association, held at [the Carnegie Institution’s complex at] Cold Spring Harbor [New York] in June of 1920. …Declaring that ‘modern civilization itself depended on Germanic and Teutonic conquest, Laughlin closed by assuring his colleagues, ‘From what the world knows of Germanic traits, we logically concede that she [Germany] will live up to her instincts of race conservation…’ …[The Carnegie Institution’s] Eugenical News published it in their next issue, as did a subsequent edition of the official British organ, Eugenics Review.”[12]

The other great Carnegie administrator and leader of the American eugenics movement, Charles Davenport, had similar views:

“Davenport saw ethnic groups as biologically different beings -- not just physically, but in terms of their character, nature, and quality. Most of the non-Nordic types, in Davenport’s view, swam at the bottom of the hereditary pool, each featuring its own distinct and indelible adverse genetic features. Italians were predisposed to personal violence. The Irish had ‘considerable mental defectiveness,’ while Germans were ‘thrifty, intelligent, and honest.’”[13]

The leaders of American eugenics claimed that the working classes in the West were ‘Mediterranean’—as opposed to ‘Germanic’—and therefore had bad genes that made them stupid, unfit for reproduction (for they would pollute ‘society’ with their bad genes), and undeserving of democratic rights. The upper classes, by contrast, were Germanic: of Anglo-Saxon, Norman, Frankish, Scandinavian, Visigothic, etc., origin.

To understand this view, one must know that when the Latin Roman Empire’s political structure collapsed, Western Europe was conquered by Germanic military aristocracies that, in alliance with the Vatican, recreated the Roman Empire as the Germanic Holy Roman Empire of the Middle Ages. Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne, the king of the Germanic tribe of the Franks, and the man who had conquered almost all of Western Europe, ‘Holy Roman Emperor’ in the year 800. Charlemagne then proceeded to distribute lands to his aristocratic accomplices all over his dominions, creating the European nobility.[14]

The eugenics movement became a tremendous phenomenon in the self-consciously Anglo-Saxon US ruling class, and the main financiers of the movement, Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller (both father and son), spent millions creating a eugenic pseudoscientific infrastructure in the United States through the millions dispensed by the Carnegie Institution and the various Rockefeller foundations, in alliance with other top American corporate leaders. What this money achieved was a transformation of US universities and a takeover of government institutions by the forces of eugenics.

“Throughout the first six decades of the twentieth century, hundreds of thousands of Americans and untold numbers of others were not permitted to continue their families by reproducing. Selected because of their ancestry, national origin, race or religion, they were forcibly sterilized, wrongly committed to mental institutions where they died in great numbers, prohibited from marrying, and sometimes even unmarried by state bureaucrats. In America, this battle to wipe out whole ethnic groups was fought not by armies with guns nor by hate sects at the margins. Rather, this pernicious white-gloved war was prosecuted by esteemed professors, elite universities, wealthy industrialists and government officials colluding in a racist, pseudoscientific movement called eugenics. The purpose: to create a superior Nordic race.

To perpetrate the campaign, widespread academic fraud combined with almost unlimited corporate philanthropy to establish the biological rationales for persecution. …Specious [i.e. fraudulent] intelligence tests, colloquially known as IQ tests, were invented to justify incarceration of a group called ‘feebleminded.’ …Mandatory sterilization laws were enacted in some twenty-seven states to prevent targeted individuals from reproducing more of their kind. Marriage prohibition laws proliferated throughout the country to stop race mixing. Collusive [i.e. fraudulent] litigation was taken to the US Supreme Court, which sanctified eugenics and its tactics.”[15]

Carnegie and Rockefeller spent also millions upon millions doing the same all over the West, but especially in Germany, where their efforts would prepare the ground for the German Nazi movement, whose ideology was almost entirely borrowed from American eugenics, as documented also by Edwin Black.

The point of the eugenics movement was to defeat movements to improve the rights of the poor that were becoming more and more powerful in the West. And also to defeat the Jewish people. Why them? In my view, because the Law of Moses, around which Jewish civilization is organized, was born, according to tradition (Exodus), in a slave revolt, and in consequence it is exquisitely designed to protect the disadvantaged from the abuses of the powerful. Repressive elements in the Western power elites have always understood that danger to them in the freedom and equality preached by Jewish ideology, and in consequence they have always persecuted the Jews.[15a]

Here follows a bit of context on Rockefeller, Carnegie, Morgan, Wilson, and Ford, the powers behind the creation and financing of the Council on Foreign Relations.

The Rockefellers

John D. Rockefeller Sr., the creator of the Standard Oil empire, was running, with his son, a system that the journalists of the day called “industrial absolutism” and also the “new feudalism.” They could also have called it “company totalitarianism.”

In Colorado Fuel & Iron (CF&I), for example, a Rockefeller concern that was one of the biggest companies in the world, workers were paid a daily wage equivalent to $1.68, with a 12-hour work day, which comes to just 14 c. an hour. But they were not paid in actual dollars. They were paid in company scrip that could only be redeemed in company stores that charged extortion prices, and they lived in miserable company shacks that charged extortion rents. In this way, they became perennially indebted to the company and could not leave.

These workers were dependent in other ways. They worshipped in company churches where company-hired pastors officiated the services. They could only read books from the company libraries that were carefully screened so as to purge anything ‘subversive.’ Their children went to company schools. When they voted, it was the company that voted. Lamont Montgomery Bowers, chairman of the board of directors,

“boasted that when he arrived in Denver, the company registered and voted every man and woman in its employ, including the 70 percent who were not even naturalized citizens, and that ‘even their mules… were registered if they were fortunate enough to possess names.’ This political power helped the operators make sure that even the primitive mine safety standards of the time were not enforced; the result was, predictably, an epidemic of accidental deaths and injuries to the workers. The miners had no placed to go to complain. County courthouses, it was commonly said, were like branch offices of CF&I, and local sheriffs enjoyed a status similar to mine superintendents.”[16]

If the workers tried to organize to demand better conditions, the company was ready: “More than 20,000 a year was spent by the company to maintain a force of detectives, mine guards, and spies whose job it was to keep the camps quarantined from the virulence of unionism.” The workers organized anyway, so “the operators in Colorado hired the Baldwin-Felts Detective Agency to spearhead their war against the UMW [United Mine Workers]. Made up of drifters and former gunmen left over from the closing of the West [i.e. from the extermination of the Native American populations], the Baldwin-Felts detectives were more detested than even the strike-breakers that Pinkerton’s had sent into the West.” These ‘detectives’ opened fire on the workers and a massacre resulted that produced a scandal.[17]

The eugenics movement, which sold itself as supposed ‘science,’ and which allowed the US ruling elite to incarcerate anybody it wanted under pretext of ‘social hygiene’ to improve society (one of Rockefeller’s organizations was called the Bureau of Social Hygiene), promised a more effective method for controlling the unruly workers.

The Rockefellers spent millions upon millions to create a pseudoscientific eugenic infrastructure permeating all major US institutions. He did the same in Europe, especially in Germany.[17a]

    “As early as 1922, despite the American political animosity against Germany that remained from World War I, the Rockefeller Foundation, through its Paris office, began funneling exorbitant sums to a committee in Germany headed by a leading eugenicist, Heinrich Poll, who was an adviser to the Prussian Ministry of Health and a lecturer on hereditary traits and feeble-mindedness.”[17b]

Andrew Carnegie

Rockefeller seems to have taken his cue about how to deal with the workers from how Andrew Carnegie dealt with his.

In an article about exploitation in the United States, sociologist Charles Perrow cites a statistic from historian Herbert G. Gutman: “Nearly 25% of the recent immigrants employed at the Carnegie South Works were injured or killed each year between 1907 and 1910, 3,723 in all.”[18]

Carnegie also paid almost nothing to his workers, and reduced their salaries and added hours to their working day whenever he could get away with it, meanwhile making untold millions of dollars in profits.

“The Carnegie Steel Company was making net profits of 17.2 percent in 1891 when it proposed a severe reduction in wages and sustained a strike. The strike in 1892 reduced its profits to only 16 percent for that year. Wages continued to go down after the strike, and in some mills, in order to keep the same wage, those working only 8 hours had to work 12 hours. In 1907, a year of ‘unexampled prosperity’ in the industry, one plant that was surveyed showed 71 percent of the workers receiving $2.50 a day or less. (It was generally agreed that a family of four needed nearly twice that much to survive.) After Carnegie broke the union in 1892, he ‘thereafter began to introduce the 12-hour day wherever possible.’”[19]

The way Carnegie “broke the union” in the Homestead Mill in 1892 was by shooting at his workers. They had been asking for better salaries, and the union was willing to negotiate. But Henry Clay Frick, Carnegie’s partner and enforcer, following his orders, closed the mill and left 3,800 men outside. In reaction, the workers took the mill in order to prevent strikebreakers to enter. So Frick brought Pinkerton Agency mercenaries and a bloody battle raged that lasted several hours. The National Guard of the State of Pennsylvania was sent to assist Carnegie against his workers, and the union was broken.[20]

“When he heard that Frick had ordered strikers at Carnegie’s Homestead steelworks shot down, John D. [Rockefeller] had immediately fired off a telegram of support to the coke magnate.”[21]

For Carnegie, as for Rockefeller, the pseudo-scientific eugenics platform became attractive as a way to put troublesome workers in jail without the nasty public relations consequences of armed combat. In 1901 he sold his steel interests to J.P. Morgan for $400 million and thereafter used his fabulous fortune to propel the eugenics movement through the Carnegie Institution, an “entity so wealthy that in 1904, Washington agreed to reincorporate the charity by special act of Congress, chartering the new name ‘Carnegie Institution of Washington.’ This made the Carnegie Institution a joint incarnation of the steel man’s money and the United States government’s cachet.”[22]

Under biologist Charles Davenport’s directorship, “on January 19, 1904, the Carnegie Institution inaugurated what it called the Station for Experimental Evolution of the Carnegie Institution at Cold Spring Harbor [New York].”[23] It is from here that Davenport and his right-hand man Harry Laughlin would throw their weight, with Carnegie’s millions, to transform the landscape of the United States in the image of their eugenic vision.

Edwin Black points out that, “from the start, the trustees of the Carnegie Institution understood that Davenport’s plan was a turning-point plan for racial breeding.”[24] One of those trustees was Elihu Root, then Secretary of War.[25] Elihu Root would also be one of the early leaders of the Council on Foreign Relations.[26]

Henry Ford and J.P. Morgan

Henry Ford was one of several big US industrialists to adopt the managing methods propounded by Charles Bedaux, who would later become a notorious Nazi collaborator. These were “brutal methods of production that brought about frequent strikes in the 1930s.”[27] So Ford’s philosophy, as in the cases of Carnegie and Rockefeller, was anti-worker.

“Shortly after the Great War [WWI] began in Europe,” writes Edwin Black in a different work, “[Henry] Ford claimed he had discovered ‘proof’ that the Jews were behind the world’s troubles.” His special mission would be to communicate this to the entire world. “In 1918 Ford purchased the weekly Dearborn Independent and soon thereafter changed its editorial thrust to virulent anti-Semitism.” In a series that bore the title, The International Jew, this weekly soon promoted and reproduced The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.[28]

This was the ‘proof’ that Henry Ford had found, and with it he fed a new wave of anti-Jewish hysteria in the Western world.

The Protocols was a fraud created by the Tsarist secret police, the Okhrana, that pretended to be the minutes of a secret group of super-powerful Jews who clandestinely had control over everything: the banks, the media, the unions, the capitalist industries, and the governments of the West.[29] (If this sounds familiar that’s because antisemitic propaganda has not changed and because The Protocols—even after millions of Jews were easily murdered by the Nazis with hardly anybody to defend them—continues to be believed, and its slanders have become institutionalized in our culture. Even people who have never heard of The Protocols, for example, will confidently state that ‘the Jews control the media,’ something that is perfectly false.)

The Russian government used this propaganda to motivate pogroms: massive, violent attacks against the Jewish communities of the Russian Empire, with the collusion of the authorities. This origin of The Protocols helps explain why “a frequent contributor [to Henry Ford’s Dearborn Independent] was a fanatical White [i.e. Tsarist] Russian, Boris Brasol, who boasted in one piece: ‘I have done the Jews more injury than would have been done in ten pogroms.’ Brasol was successively an agent of the Tsar, and of the US Army Intelligence; later he became a Nazi spy.”[30]

Before the 1920s the dominant banking concern in the United States, by far, had been the House of Morgan. But during that decade much competition emerged in investment banking, and some of the new tough competitors were Jewish. Historian Thomas Ferguson writes that, in reaction, “J. P. Morgan Jr. quietly encouraged Henry Ford’s circulation of the notorious Protocols of the Elders of Zion in the early 1920s, and later his bank forbade Morgan-Harjes, the firm's Paris partner, to honor letters of credit from Manufacturers Trust, a commercial bank with strong ties to Goldman, Sachs and Lehman Brothers [a Jewish-owned bank].”[31]

In hoaxing the The Protocols, the Okhrana had done little more than cut and paste from works of fiction, but especially from Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu.[32] This book, by the French political philosopher Maurice Joly, had been originally written to attack the authoritarian government of Napoleon III, and had absolutely nothing to do with Jews, one way or another. In 1921 Phillip Graves from the London Times published a series of very detailed articles, quoting Dialogues and The Protocols side by side so that readers could see that the second text had been copied from the first.[33] This demonstration did not affect Henry Ford’s campaign, nor did alter its effectiveness, much, especially with Europeans.

According to Ford, a Jewish conspiracy stood behind World War I (never mind, then, how the antisemitic Hohenzollern Reich had armed itself to the teeth and instigated that war). His Dearborn Independent, moreover, accused ‘the Jews’ of practically anything—everything—that he didn’t like.

“These accusations were not just the ramblings of the Dearborn Independent. They were in fact a product of the Ford Motor Company. Henry Ford listed his name at the top of every front page. Ford motorcar dealers were compelled to buy and sell subscriptions. Dealers who filled their subscriptions quotas received Ford cars as prizes. …Many reluctant dealers received threatening legalistic letters insisting that they sell the tabloid. Reprints were bound into booklets and distributed to libraries and YMCA’s throughout the nation. …[Henry Ford] was the hero of antisemites the world over. In Germany, thousands of copies of Ford’s teachings were published under the title The Eternal Jew, by Heinrich Ford. Ford’s book quickly became the bible of German antisemites, including Adolf Hitler -- this, at least two years before Mein Kampf was written. Hitler… hung a large portrait of Ford beside his desk and spoke of him incessantly.”[34]

After Hitler took power in Germany, “millions of Ford’s books were circulated to every school and party office in the nation, many featuring the names Hitler and Ford side by side on the cover.”[35]

The cultural impact of Ford in Germany was made clear by Baldur von Schirach, whose Hitler Youth movement poisoned the minds of an entire generation of Germans. Schirach said that Ford’s book had converted him to antisemitism.[36] In his war crimes trial in Nuremberg he exclaimed: “You have no idea what a great influence this book had on the thinking of German youth.” He was talking about The International Jew, better known in Germany as The Eternal Jew, and none other than The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. “The younger generation looked with envy to symbols of success and prosperity like Henry Ford, and if he said the Jews were to blame, why naturally we believed him.”[37]

My colleague the anthropologist Joseph Henrich and I have made a careful review of the mountain of evidence in the social sciences supporting the view that the ideas of people with prestige—regardless of content—tend to propagate with greater ease, due to certain important psychological biases that affect social-learning processes.[38] Ford’s prestige was stratospheric: “Henry Ford was once ranked in popular polls as the third greatest man in history: just below Napoleon and Jesus Christ.”[39] He used this enormous prestige to propagate anti-Jewish hatred everywhere, but especially in the United States and Germany.

In fact, much of Hitler’s inspiration came directly from Henry Ford, and the führer was so taken with the automobile industrialist that in 1931, shortly before he was to come to power, he told the Detroit News: “I consider Henry Ford my inspiration.” This was literally true, because not only had The International Jew been written before Hitler’s own Mein Kampf, but in fact “many of the ramblings in Mein Kampf were identical to passages in The International Jew.” And that’s not all. The systems of mass production that Hitler transformed into systems of mass murder had been first innovated by Henry Ford, the hero of German industrialists who in fact proclaimed themselves ‘Fordists.’[40]

In the United States, Ford’s antisemitic campaign led to a boycott against his company that finally forced him to desist in that country and to offer a public act of contrition in 1927. But this ‘contrition’ didn’t stop him from accepting the highest decoration that the Nazi state gave to foreigners in 1938, and neither did it soften the effect that Ford had had on the Western masses (they simply interpreted this as the ‘powerful Jews’ forcing the industrialist to back down).

Woodrow Wilson

Most people ‘remember’ US President Woodrow Wilson as a great liberal, because his apologists have represented him this way. For example, the Encyclopedia Britannica, custodian of mainstream opinion, writes that Wilson is “remembered for… his ethical idealism.”[41] And Wilson’s main biographer, Arthur S. Link, states in an article that Wilson supposedly was not a racist, which he says right after telling us that Joseph Wilson, the father, was “an ardent defender of slavery”—so much so that he had allied with the Southern Confederacy that fought to preserve slavery even though he was not from there. The son, however, according to Link, had pro black ideas far in advance of the average racist in the US Southern aristocracy in which he grew up.[41a]

And yet Woodrow’s racist policies aren’t exactly a secret. “As president of Princeton, he had turned away black applicants, regarding their desire for education to be ‘unwarranted.’”[42] When he became Governor of New Jersey in 1910, Woodrow Wilson became one of the most radical leaders of the eugenics movement, with great political consequences. Later Link would admit frankly to an Afro-American journal that his protagonist was indeed a racist.[43]

As Governor of New Jersey, Wilson pioneered one of the first eugenics state laws that Charles Davenport was calling for in his book. They were draconian. “Chapter 190 of its statutory code created a special three-man ‘Board of Examiners of Feebleminded, Epileptics, and Other Defectives.’”[44] The category “Other Defectives” was deliberately an open one because this gave him the greatest repressive latitude.

The man who drafted the New Jersey eugenics law for Wilson was Dr. Katzen-Ellenbogen, who would later become a notorious killer doctor in Adolf Hitler's Buchenwald concentration camp.[45]

In Woodrow Wilson’s eugenic New Jersey,

“The administrative hearing was held within the institution itself [orphanages, state asylums, etc.], not in a courtroom under a judge’s gavel. Moreover, the court-designated counsel for the patient was given only five days before the sterilization decision was sealed. Thus the process would be swift, certainly beyond the grasp of the confused children dwelling within state shelters.”[46]

There is no question that the eugenicists were hypocrites. As a boy Wilson didn’t manage to learn how to read until age 11; his own New Jersey system would have declared him ‘feebleminded.’ But Wilson didn’t rush to be interned into one of his state institutions.[47]

Once inaugurated as US president in 1913, Wilson made a “push to institutionalize [the system] of [racial] segregation within the federal civil service.” Soon the toilets, cafeterias, and work areas of the various government departments had been segregated. Many black federal officers were fired, and the Washington police and fire departments ceased hiring blacks. (The man in charge of segregating for Wilson the restrooms in the buildings of the Departments of State, War, and the Navy was his protégé, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Undersecretary of the Navy.)[48]

“[Woodrow Wilson] embraced the poisonous message of D.W. Griffith's 1915 film, The Birth of a Nation,” which celebrated the Ku Klux Klan, a violent and racist anti-black organization. “The movie was based primarily on The Clansman, a novel written by Thomas Dixon in 1905. Not only was Dixon a personal friend of Wilson’s, he had been pushing for a Wilson presidency for years, and Wilson regarded himself as being in Dixon’s debt. Wilson discharged that debt by helping Dixon and Griffith publicize their movie.”[48a]

Now, what does this help us explain?

Once the eugenic ideology of those who got the Council on Foreign Relations going is understood, it is pertinent to ask whether this helps us solve any apparent incongruities that would otherwise embarrass a historical analysis. The answer is that it does.

US foreign policy in the years after the creation
of the CFR

The people around Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who made him president, were from the same circles that created the CFR. They had the same ideology.

Originally belonging to J.P. Morgan, Chase National Bank had merged with the Rockefeller’s Equitable Trust in 1929, and by the end of 1932 it was firmly under Rockefeller control. Winthrop Aldrich—Rockefeller Jr.’s brother-in-law—became the president. The people at the top of Chase—shortly to become the biggest bank in the United States—had a close relationship with Roosevelt and supported his candidacy.

Aldrich’s best friend was Gordon Auchincloss, from one of the most aristocratic families in the United States. Auchincloss was also a member of the Chase board and married to Colonel Edward M. House’s daughter. House had been eugenicist Woodrow Wilson’s main advisor in foreign policy. “During the campaign and transition period, House and Vincent Astor, Roosevelt’s cousin and also a member of the reorganized Chase board, passed messages between Roosevelt and Chase.”[49]

With Theodore and Kermit Roosevelt, also cousins of FDR, Vincent Astor had founded The Rooom, FDR’s private espionage group, which included Chase president Winthrop Aldrich.[50] As if being at the top of the Rockefeller empire were not enough, Theodore and Kermit had grown up hearing the ideological views of their father, President Theodore Roosevelt: “A strong supporter of the growing eugenics movement in the United States, Roosevelt called for ‘racial purity’ and warned against interracial marriage as a form of ‘race suicide.’”[51] In 1913 Theodore Roosevelt had actually sent Charles Davenport, leader of the American eugenics movement, a letter expressing the close agreement between his ideas and Davenport’s.[52]

On the other side of the Atlantic, Nancy Astor, married to Vincent’s cousin William Waldorf Astor, led the aristocratic Cliveden set, which was widely held to be a pro-Nazi group with great influence in British government circles. David Efron, writing in Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science in 1939, called the Cliveden set a Nazi “Trojan Horse.”[53] Here too, there was a relationship. To gauge it, consider that, immediately before Roosevelt’s inauguration of January 1933, William Waldorf Astor and his wife Nancy traveled to the United States and stayed in the president-elect’s own residence.[54]

Another important Roosevelt supporter was William Randolph Hearst, owner of about half of all the press in the United States, and Lord over Hollywood, was called by his contemporaries “the most influential American fascist... the keystone of American fascism.”[55]

Hearst was an intimate friend of the German millionaire Putzi Hanfstaengl, who was nothing less than Adolf Hitler’s financial backer and press secretary.[56] Consistent with all that, Hearst attended the famous Nuremberg rallies with the hysterically adoring crowds that Leni Riefenstahl immortalized in her famous Nazi propaganda films, staying in the same hotel with all the top Nazis. Goebbels’ Nazi propaganda ministry went out of its way to report the gushing reactions of Hearst’s son George. There were accusations at the time—deserved ones, it appears—that Hearst had made an agreement with Hitler to give him good press in the United States.[57]

Hearst’s views on foreign policy during the 1930s—published as editorials in all his variegated newspapers—were as follows:

1)    the Treaty of Versailles (imposed on Germany after WWI, was unfair);

2)    Nazism was an important bulwark against communism;

3)    the US should not threaten Germany or make any movement to support the Treaty of Versailles;

4)    the Popular Front government in France—a parliamentary socialist government—was a Soviet satellite;

5)    the Nazi demands for revisions of borders were legitimate;

6)    the Nazis were right to reoccupy the Rhineland;

7)    even if the Nazis attacked US Navy shipping, this should be tolerated if they apologized sincerely (!);

8)    Chamberlain was right in giving Czechoslovakia to Hitler;

9)    Franco in Spain was preferable to the parliamentary, leftist alternative.

Hearst’s criticisms of the Nazis for the way they attacked all sorts of innocent people in Germany were quite mild, and they don’t refute the hypothesis of a pro-Nazi orientation; on the contrary, what they suggest is that, within the limits of what his political position allowed in the United States, he came as close as he could to a public approbation of the Nazi movement. Meanwhile, he repeatedly attacked Great Britain and France for supposedly not being true democracies![58]

Then there is the afore-mentioned Colonel House.

“Colonel Edward House[, who] had been a longtime adviser to [radical eugenicist] Woodrow Wilson… [now] helped chart Roosevelt’s early path. …Making overtures to William Randolph Hearst and other like-minded businessmen, Roosevelt repudiated his earlier strong support for the League of Nations.”[59]

This means that Roosevelt repudiated the Treaty of Versailles, which the Nazis were also doing.

It was with Hearst’s support that Roosevelt became president. What followed was the famous policy of so-called ‘appeasement,’ which is usually blamed especially on the French and British, and in particular on British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. This policy, however, was equally Roosevelt’s policy, though in public he postured differently from what he was doing behind the scenes.[60]

This policy of ‘appeasement,’ so convenient to Hitler, and so puzzling to historians, makes sense when we consider that the same eugenicist and pro-Nazi powers behind the Council on Foreign Relations were also responsible for placing Roosevelt in the White House.

The same historical analysis makes sense of Allied policy toward the Holocaust.

It is commonly claimed that the leaders of US and Britain were indifferent to the Holocaust, but this is not true. They barred entry to the desperate Jewish refugees, trapping them in Europe, and they even deployed vigorous diplomacy to prevent other countries from taking them. Despite repeated pleas, they refused to bomb the railways leading to Auschwitz, or the death camp itself.

Not content with that, with Roosevelt’s approval, Undersecretary of State Breckenridge Long developed an immigration policy designed to trap the European Jews where Hitler would find them: instead of denying visas outright, consular offices were told to “postpone, postpone, postpone...”—that is, to tell Jews who requested visas that there were temporary obstacles, but never to grant them. In this way, the desperate Jewish refugees, believing this was just a temporary delay, did not seek refuge elsewhere.[60a]

These policies are not consistent with disinterest, but rather with a strong interest in the death of the European Jews.

Something else this analysis explains is what historian Charles Higham documented with great detail in the following work:

Higham, C. 1995[1983]. Trading with the Enemy: The Nazi-American Money Plot 1933-1949. New York: Barnes & Noble.

Notice the dates. What Higham showed, with a mountain of documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, is that even after the US declaration of war against the Axis Powers, the leading eugenicist businessmen in the United States, led by the Rockefellers, financed Hitler’s war effort (and sabotaged the supply of key war materials to the US forces). They did this with Roosevelt’s protection, even as US workers were dressed up as soldiers and blown up to bits on the various fronts.

It also helps us explain what historian Christopher Simpson documented, also with a mountain of documents declassified under the FOA:

Simpson, C. 1988. Blowback: America's recruitment of Nazis and its effects on the Cold War. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.

After the war, the US government created US Intelligence by recruiting tens of thousands of former Nazis.[60b]

So why don’t political scientists investigate the CFR?

We began with the observation that very little academic work exists on the CFR, and that political scientists who interest themselves in this organization are told by their colleagues that this is not really ‘political science.’ Why might that be? It may have something to do with the influence wielded across modern Academia by the eugenicists who created the CFR.

The industrial bosses began investing heavily in higher education in the late 19th century, and soon they could make life quite difficult for any academic who talked too much about workers’ rights.[65a] In 1903, Rockefeller incorporated the General Education Board (GEB) and invited Carnegie to join. The objective, according to Frederick Gates, chief administrator of Rockefeller ‘philanthropy,’ was “ ‘to reduce our higher education to something like an orderly and comprehensive system.’ ”[65b] The Council on Foreign Relations was created as a key component of that system, where domesticated academics could be brought together to craft policies to the liking of these eugenicist industrial sponsors.

“[John D. Rockefeller] Junior’s zeal in footing the bill for the work of eugenicists would be felt around the world. By 1922, he had a personal fortune of half a billion dollars, and ‘a key role to play in a whole set of major philanthropic organizations, a growing circle of trusted and talented advisers, and goals and interests ...both overseas and at home, on a wide-ranging scale never before seen and never since equaled.’ In 1921, he helped organize the Council on Foreign Relations, with Elihu Root and AES-member Jerome Greene.”

But the CFR was just one component. The “comprehensive system” was much larger:

“Junior made significant contributions to the League of Nations and spent $28 million to establish the International Education Board, which sought to ‘identify scientists and institutions of great quality’ to be ‘centers of inspiration and training’ for an ‘international migration of select students.’ The IEB funded new biology laboratories at a dozen European universities. In the U.S., Junior ensured his influence in academia by spending $41 million between 1922 and 1928 in grants to 25 universities for social-science programs. Five institutions—the University of Chicago, Columbia, the Brookings Institution, and Harvard, along with England’s London School of Economics—received more than half of the money. Others that received ‘substantial sums’ were Yale, Minnesota, Iowa State, Vanderbilt, North Carolina, California, Stanford, and Texas.”[66]

In 1923, just two years after the creation of the CFR, an agency was created to coordinate the social sciences: the Social Science Research Council (SSRC). This organ was founded by Charles Merriam, professor of political science at the University of Chicago. Merriam was quite important, “and through his students he became the architect of American political science as it developed after World War II.” It is probably relevant, then, that Merriam “applauded all that was being done in the name of eugenics.”[61]

Merriam’s main allies in the creation of the SSRC were Beardsley Ruml and Wesley Clair Mitchell.[62] Ruml, since 1917, was the director of one of the Rockefeller foundations: the Laura Spellman Rockefeller Memorial (LSRM). Mitchell had created the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), an organ that, like the CFR, almost literally fused itself with the US government, and whose “main source of funds was the Carnegie Corporation. Among foundations the Commonwealth Fund and the Laura Spellman Rockefeller Memorial were also important backers.”[63]

While Ruml poured Rockefeller resources into the SSRC, Michell connected the new organization to the NBER. In the first 10 years, the SSRC granted $4 million for social science research, becoming a major force with the power to reward the kind of work that its powerful sponsors wanted.[64] The money of Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Russell Sage “provided the organization with a solid footing through the end of World War II.”[65]

After the war, in the 1950s, the Congressional Reece Committee produced a sharp controversy when it investigated and denounced the dangers inherent in “the promotion of political ends, favored perhaps by foundation managers, …disguised as charitable or educational activity.” There was now a veritable “ ‘network or cartel’ in the social sciences,’ ” crushingly dominated by the Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Ford foundations—the “big three.” These “big three,” the Reece Committee complained, had destroyed the free market in knowledge production. But nothing happened, because “there was powerful opposition to any investigation of these multi-billion-dollar public trusts.”[66a]

Of course, journalists might peek in areas neglected by academics. But the eugenicist bosses had a strategy there too: they created the science of ‘communication research,’ and, in a period of five years, in the immediate postwar, seeded the university system with ‘communication’ departments that henceforth trained virtually the entire population of journalists.

In conclusion, given that the eugenicist Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller networks spent a fortune creating a social science cartel, and given that within that “comprehensive system” they also created the Council on Foreign Relations, it makes sense that academics should be reluctant to do research on the CFR itself. Particularly political scientists, heirs to one Charles Merriam, eugenicist, who became the father of modern American political science. And especially considering that Foreign Affairs, perhaps the most important vehicle of prestige in political science and international relations, is published by the CFR.

A note about the stability of institutional ideology

An institution is a network of organized relationships between people whose individual roles are defined by their kind of membership. These individuals will all die, and they may leave the institution even before passing away, but the institution survives because new people are always being recruited to the vacancies. An institution is potentially eternal. The Catholic Church, for example, is 2000 years old. Now, the question for us is this: if an institution is created around a strong ideology, then, as certain members die or leave, what happens to this ideology? Does it change or does it remain stable?

Many people, I have found, hold the following folk theory about institutions: the passage of time will alter their ideology. As members die or leave and are replaced with others, the institution will change because people have all kinds of different ideologies. Accordingly, the burden of proof is on whoever claims that, after X number of years, the founding ideology of an institution will remain the same. I think this is backwards: the burden of proof, in my view, is on whoever affirms that the ideology of an institution has changed.

Imagine institution V, created to promote vegetarianism, and run, naturally, by vegetarians. There are 10 people in the executive board. One day, at time = t, one of the board members dies. What kind of a person will the remaining 9 members look for? Another vegetarian. A meat-eater might be recruited to fill relatively low positions that are strongly utilitarian: for example, an expert in marketing might be hired even if he eats meat, because he is a mercenary who will do his contract job. But it would be remarkable for this institution to hire meat eaters to the governing board, where policy decisions are made. Given that at time = t vacancies were filled, and especially in the upper echelons, with vegetarians, the vacancies at time t+1 will also be filled with vegetarians, because once again those doing the selecting are surviving vegetarians. And so forth. There is no reason to expect that the passage of time will turn this vegetarianism-promoting institution into an institution that celebrates meat. The ideology of the institution creates a selection pressure in the recruiting process that works to keep the ideology stable.

What does the future hold for Israel?

As per the above argument, there is every reason to expect that, since the powerful people who created the CFR had a eugenic ideology, they will have recruited like-minded people to fill any vacancies, and so on and so forth. So the CFR in the postwar years, and more generally the US foreign policy establishment, will have maintained a stable eugenic ideology. If so, this would certainly explain why, contrary to popular belief, US foreign policy throughout the second half of the 20th c.., and into the 21st, has been consistently anti-Israel.

What does the future hold for Israel?

Even diehard defenders of the view that US foreign policy is pro-Israel have been having trouble with that hypothesis in light of recent US behavior, which has become quite extreme. So it matters that John McCain, who claims to be pro-Israel and anti-Iran, has been a member of the CFR since 1997.[67] Politicians represent themselves in public in whichever way that is convenient, so McCain's membership in the CFR suggests that his policy as president would be anti-Israel, regardless of what he now says.

It appears that Hillary Clinton is not a member of the CFR. However, husband Bill Clinton has been a member since 1989,[68] and Hillary gives speeches at the CFR and clearly approves of the institution.[69]

A lot of people seem to think that Barack Obama’s wife is on the board of directors of the Chicago CFR. Technically, she is. Except that the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, which now calls itself the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, is not affiliated with the CFR (at least they claim not to be).[70] But given past history, there is no reason to believe that Barack Obama's administration, if elected, would not fill many of the top foreign policy positions with CFR members, or with protégés of the same.

One can expect that, regardless of who wins, US foreign policy will continue to be remarkably consistent, and decided at the CFR.


TMR 062 : Transcript : F. William Engdahl : Seeds of Destruction - The GMO Hidden Agenda


Legalised non-consensual sterilisation – eugenics put into practice before 1945, and the aftermath. Part 1: USA, Japan, Canada and Mexico


In the late 19th century, eugenics, a pseudo-scientific doctrine based on an erroneous interpretation of the laws of heredity, swept across the industrialised world. Academics and other influential figures who promoted it convinced political stakeholders to enact laws authorising the sterilisation of people seen as ‘social misfits’. The earliest sterilisation Act was enforced in Indiana, in 1907; most states in the USA followed suit and so did several countries, with dissimilar political regimes. The end of the Second World War saw the suspension of Nazi legislation in Germany, including that regulating coerced sterilisation. The year 1945 should have been the endpoint of these inhuman practices but, in the early post-war period, the existing sterilisation Acts were suspended solely in Germany and Austria. Only much later did certain countries concerned – not Japan so far – officially acknowledge the human rights violations committed, issue apologies and develop reparation schemes for the victims’ benefit.


Eugenics Today: How Vaccines Are Used to Sterilize the Masses


The Population Council has a shocking 65-year history, and it’s nothing to celebrate


Rockefeller, Nazis, The UN, & Genocide


Here Comes the Master Race


Eugenics and America's Campaign
to Create a Master Race.
By Edwin Black.
Illustrated. 550 pp. New York:
Four Walls Eight Windows. $27.
EUGENICS -- the idea of manipulating human genes to the end of improving individuals, groups or entire populations -- is strongly associated with the Nazi programs of sterilization, euthanasia and genocide. But during the first third of the 20th century, eugenics movements flourished in many nations, including the United States. In the last few years, newspaper articles have called attention to -- and prompted official apologies for -- state-mandated sterilizations done legally to rid society of its alleged human trash, the ''weak'' in the title of Edwin Black's new book, notably in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Oregon and California.
Black is the author previously of ''IBM and the Holocaust,'' a work strongly suggesting that the company, with its punch-card machines, knowingly assisted Hitler's brutalities. His ''War Against the Weak,'' apparently written with similar intent, is a muckraking book about a subject incontestably awash in muck. In the vein of the genre, it is a stew rich in facts and spiced with half-truths, exaggerations and distortions. The most pungent ingredient is its central thesis: eugenic doctrines and policies favoring ''Nordic superiority'' were in fact invented in the United States, were developed in alliance with American wealth and power, and were then exported, inspiring Hitler and achieving their ultimate realization in the Holocaust.
Black pursues his thesis across largely familiar ground -- the eugenic theories that attributed costly physical conditions and socially deleterious behaviors to genetics, accounting for many of them as expressions of ''feeble-mindedness''; the claims in the United States that such deficiencies occurred with particularly high frequency among African-Americans and immigrants from eastern and southern Europe; the respectable standing of eugenic science at leading universities, state agencies and institutions, public interest organizations and research installations, notably the Eugenics Record Office, which was part of what became the department of genetics at the Carnegie Institution of Washington and which was financed in the main by the widow of the railroad magnate E. H. Harriman and in part by grants from the Rockefeller philanthropies. Black rightly observes that eugenic research into heredity combined ''equal portions of gossip, race prejudice, sloppy methods and leaps of logic, all caulked together by elements of actual genetic knowledge to create the glitter of a genuine science.''
The eugenics movement provided a biological rationale for the Immigration Act of 1924, which discriminated against immigrants from eastern and southern Europe, and for laws in a number of states that restricted interracial marriage. It scored a major victory with the case of Buck v. Bell in 1927, in which the United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 8 to 1, upheld the constitutionality of Virginia's eugenic sterilization law, with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. writing for the majority that the principle that upheld vaccination for the good of the community's physical health could sustain cutting the fallopian tubes for the benefit of its social health.

Black has used the considerable work on eugenics, assiduously checking sources, including my own, and drawn on original published and archival materials in the United States and Europe, collecting some 50,000 documents, he tells us, with the aid of numerous volunteers working in several dozen repositories. If he covers what is in the main a well-known story, he adds to it substantial new detail, much of it chilling in its exposure of the shameless racism, class prejudice and cruelties of eugenic attitudes and practices in the United States. Some American eugenicists argued for killing the ''unfit,'' and a few indeed practiced it by subjecting newborns to euthanasia (not a merciful death for those in pain, Black points out, but a painless death for those ''deemed unworthy of life'').

In support of his main thesis, Black stresses that European eugenicists were linked with their American counterparts through international organizations, meetings, correspondence and visits several made to the United States, some to work at the Eugenics Record Office. German eugenicists praised American policies, research and writings and incorporated accounts of them into their works. In ''Mein Kampf,'' Hitler himself praised America's sterilization laws and immigration restriction act. Black also emphasizes that beginning in the 20's and continuing well into the Nazi period, the Rockefeller Foundation provided sizable funds for research at three eugenically oriented research institutes in Germany. All, he writes, would ''make their mark in the history of medical murder.''
True enough, eugenic actions were pioneered in the United States, and a number of American eugenicists praised the Nazi sterilization law, noting it was devoid of racial intent and robustly consistent with Buck v. Bell. But it greatly oversimplifies matters to say that the American example pointed Nazi Germany down the road to the Holocaust. Many American eugenicists opposed the Nazis outright, and even the most avid enthusiasts of sterilization turned against them after the proclamation of the Nuremberg Laws. Black basically argues that because the mad beast had some American markings, its chief features must have all been bred in the United States. But as he himself acknowledges, the nations of Europe had their own, indigenous eugenics movements. Notions of Nordic superiority had strong, independent roots abroad, and so did ideas of racial improvement through measures like sterilization. The Nazis did draw on American precedents, but Black neglects to weigh the impact of the imports against the force of native impulses.
Black writes that in the 30's refugees were denied entry to the United States ''because of the Carnegie Institution's openly racist anti-immigrant activism,'' ignoring the far more powerful forces, including anti-Semitism and economic fears, that kept the gates closed. While some Rockefeller Foundation money did go, at least indirectly, to some anti-Semitic scientists and racially oriented research in Nazi Germany, the foundation increasingly aimed at supporting individuals engaged in objective investigations of the genetics of nonhuman organisms as well as of human beings, part of a broad trend then beginning elsewhere in Europe and in the United States to liberate human genetics from socially prejudicial eugenics. Black deals with these efforts dismissively, writing that the Rockefeller Foundation, for instance, remained committed to the goal of ''creating a superior race.''
More important, the fundamental dynamics of the eugenics movement are only partly illuminated by compilations of its cruelties, its philanthropic patronage and its institutional footholds. Eugenics was an insidious doctrine, unabashed in its aim of deploying up-to-date science to solve social problems, even if that meant writing the ostensible dregs of society out of the American social compact. It nevertheless attracted many adherents among the white middle class, not only conservatives but also a number of disparate progressives, including, for example, Theodore Roosevelt, Margaret Sanger and Rabbi Stephen Wise. Despite its imperfections, Black's book does prompt us to wonder what in medical genetics and biotechnology we are taking socially and morally for granted today that our descendants might indict us for tomorrow.




Eugenics in the United States

Eugenics, the set of beliefs and practices which aims at improving the genetic quality of the human population, played a significant role in the history and culture of the United States prior to its involvement in World War II.

Eugenics was practiced in the United States many years before eugenics programs in Nazi Germany,[5] which were largely inspired by the previous American work.[6][7][8] Stefan Kühl has documented the consensus between Nazi race policies and those of eugenicists in other countries, including the United States, and points out that eugenicists understood Nazi policies and measures as the realization of their goals and demands.

During the Progressive Era of the late 19th and early 20th century, eugenics was considered a method of preserving and improving the dominant groups in the population; it is now generally associated with racist and nativist elements, as the movement was to some extent a reaction to a change in emigration from Europe, rather than scientific genetics.


    1 History
        1.1 Early proponents
        1.2 Immigration restrictions
        1.3 Unfit vs. fit individuals
        1.4 Compulsory sterilization
        1.5 Euthanasia programs
        1.6 Better baby contests
        1.7 Fitter family for future
        1.8 Planned Parenthood and the African American community
        1.9 African-American support of eugenics
        1.10 Influence on Nazi Germany
        1.11 Eugenics After World War II
            1.11.1 Genetic engineering
        1.12 Compulsory sterilization prevention
    2 See also
    3 References
        3.1 Notes
        3.2 Bibliography
    4 Further reading
    5 External links

Unfit vs. fit individuals

Both class and race factored into eugenic definitions of "fit" and "unfit." By using intelligence testing, American eugenicists asserted that social mobility was indicative of one's genetic fitness.[52] This reaffirmed the existing class and racial hierarchies and explained why the upper-to-middle class was predominantly white. Middle-to-upper class status was a marker of "superior strains."[31] In contrast, eugenicists believed poverty to be a characteristic of genetic inferiority, which meant that those deemed "unfit" were predominantly of the lower classes.[31]

Because class status designated some more fit than others, eugenicists treated upper and lower class women differently. Positive eugenicists, who promoted procreation among the fittest in society, encouraged middle class women to bear more children. Between 1900 and 1960, Eugenicists appealed to middle class white women to become more "family minded," and to help better the race.[53] To this end, eugenicists often denied middle and upper class women sterilization and birth control.[54]

Since poverty was associated with prostitution and "mental idiocy," women of the lower classes were the first to be deemed "unfit" and "promiscuous."

African-American support of eugenics

Some African-Americans have been proponents of eugenics. Thomas Wyatt Turner, a professor at Howard University and a well respected scientist incorporated eugenics into his classes. The NAACP founder asked his students how eugenics can affect society in a good way in 1915. W.E.B DuBois, a historian and civil rights leader had some beliefs that lined up with eugenics. He believed in developing the best versions of African Americans in order for his race to succeed.

See also

    flagUnited States portal

    Eugenics Board of North Carolina
    Eugenics in California
    Franz Boas
    International Federation of Eugenics Organizations
    Nazi human experimentation
    Poe v. Lynchburg Training School & Hospital (1981)
    Racial Integrity Act of 1924
    Racial segregation in the United States
    Racism in the United States
    Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942)
    Society for Biodemography and Social Biology
    Sterilization law in the United States
    Stump v. Sparkman (1978)
    The Kallikak Family
    Tuskegee syphilis experiment
    Unethical human experimentation in the United States


Margaret Sanger and the eugenics movement

On a Sunday dedicated to honoring motherhood, May 11, 2010, the Denver Post chose to celebrate everything glaringly responsible for preventing or terminating motherhood. And, to someone like me who is slightly older than the “Pill” and who was 18 at the time of Roe v. Wade, the appearance of the Post’s Mother’s Day article was curious because there is much more that people should know about the threesome of Margaret Sanger, the “Pill” and Planned Parenthood, the nations’ largest abortion provider.

Margaret Sanger belonged to an organization called the American Eugenics Society, organized in the early 1900’s. Members from the American Eugenics Society actually formed Sanger’s original group whose name was changed to Planned Parenthood, but even the latter’s first three presidents were officers or members in the AES, including Alan Guttmacher. Sanger is listed as a member in 1956 under her then-married name, Mrs. Noah Slee.

Later called social biology, genetics, and population control, eugenics was a “scientific” endeavor born from evolutionary biology. It was never confined to state-sponsorship under Communists and Socialist dictators. Eugenics operated quite openly in the United States, England and around the world. The efforts of the American Eugenics Society resulted in many states passing laws to sterilize more than 63,000 Americans. Several states passed official apologies in the 1990’s. The eugenics movement, particularly Margaret Sanger, ranted against the Catholic Church for opposing eugenic legislation and ideology.

Leaders of the American eugenics movement were later troubled that Hitler tarnished the word “eugenics;” however, they did not abandon the quest for a thoroughbred stock of humans, such as Margaret Sanger herself touted. They simply chose new words to describe eugenics. As recently as 1968, one of the leading evolutionary biologists and an officer in the American Eugenics Society, Theodosius Dobzhansky, said that the word “genetics” meant the same thing as “eugenics” and commended the goals of eugenics. The control of reproduction remained the primary goal of eugenics in order to improve the human gene pool. Throughout its existence Planned Parenthood has been a key tool to reduce or eliminate births among blacks, other minorities and the disabled.

The Post’s Mother’s Day article typifies the popular narrative, which was really a sophisticated marketing campaign so good that no one questions it. Almost never, anyway. It sought to convince women to become customers of a then-unpopular product by convincing them that, prior to the commercial launch of the Pill in the 1960’s, our mothers and grandmothers were veritable slaves to their wombs, their husbands and the very concept of marriage.

Coincidentally, of course, legal abortion also covered up the “Pill’s” failure rate. In the new movie, “Blood Money,” former abortionist Carol Everett says her abortion facility intentionally passed out low dose birth control pills to increase the likelihood of customer pregnancies and those money-making back-up abortions.

In the 70’s, one of the messages was that women had a singular duty not to add another child to a polluted, war-torn mad, mad world which would be blown up at any minute by nuclear war. However, the other sub-text, the one where evil should have been blatantly denounced if media, politicians, academia and the rest of us had not been so – to put it charitably – timid, was the pronouncement that disabled and minority children were particularly “unwanted” and specially targeted for elimination through abortion and the parallel development of genetic tests for destructive uses.

Now, nearly all Downs Syndrome babies are terminated before they are born, as part of a public policy by the U.S. Supreme Court laid down in Roe and reiterated again and again. Pro-life leader Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King, Jr. writes, “Abortion and racism stem from the same poisonous root, selfishness.”

Largely, the eugenics/population control movement has been powered by huge trusts with billions of dollars in global assets. As investment vehicles, they likely receive income from corporations engaged in a global distribution of birth control pills, IUDs, patches, injections and so forth. If so, their capital holdings, dividends and bonuses are gilded by U.S. taxpayer funding for the system of product distribution, funding appropriated as a quid pro quo from politicians grateful for the campaign donations. Money talks. Blood money.


War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race

Eugenics is too frequently overlooked in histories of both the United States and Europe, even though the story is a fascinating and important one. The field to date has remained largely the preserve of academic historians, despite obvious connections to contemporary debates around science and ethics. These were prime motivations for War Against the Weak, Edwin Black's timely look at American eugenics and its impact on Nazism.?

Black's earlier book, IBM and the Holocaust, traced the role of the information technology company IBM in creating Nazi Germany's punch-card technology for classifying victims of Nazi genocide. War Against the Weak continues the theme that the United States was a major contributor to Nazi genocide, but considerably overstates the case by shoehorning evidence into the argument that all European eugenics movements, including the German, were merely offshoots of American eugenics.

Created in Britain in 1883 by Sir Francis Galton (Charles Darwin's cousin), eugenics became reality in the United States before the rise of Nazism. Spurious scientific and medical work by eugenicists led to the forced sterilisation of 60 000 Americans and the banning of ethnically mixed marriages in many states. A eugenically inspired immigration act in 1924 kept out millions of Slavs, Jews, and others, who were subsequently killed by Nazi Germany's eugenically inspired genocide.

Black properly shows that eugenics was about more than just ethnicity and disability by discussing class, intelligence, crime, poverty, sexuality, alcoholism, and prostitution. Eugenics was also fundamentally about saving taxpayer dollars.

While factually accurate, at the level of interpretation Black's work is fatally flawed. He interprets history with the benefit of hindsight, seeing all events leading inexorably to eugenically inspired genocide and blaming those who could not see it at the time.

Black also has an America-centric worldview. He denies the existence of a vibrant German movement before American money arrived after the first world war. This misses the reality that Germany had a movement following its own course. While American eugenics moved from extreme to subtle, the German movement went the other way, ending in genocide. If Black has substantial evidence for his claim that Hitler's emergence in 1924 led to an “equal partnership” between the US and German eugenics movements, this fundamentally changes the history of eugenics in both countries and deserves far more than a sentence buried deep in the book.

Black claims that British eugenics was almost completely imported from the United States. While Britain, thankfully, did not enact any major pieces of eugenic legislation, it did have an independent and vigorous eugenics movement through the period. Whereas American eugenics focused on disability and ethnicity, Britain's eugenics movement was class oriented and led overwhelmingly from the Bloomsbury and Fabian left.

Experts on the history of eugenics will find plenty to argue with in War Against the Weak. Nevertheless the book should open an important field to a new audience. The relevance to contemporary scientific, genetic, and ethical issues is impossible to ignore. Black warns of the dangers, especially of linking economic and financial policy to science. The reader is rightly left wondering whether eugenics has gone away entirely.


Are the Rockefellers of Jewish Descent?

Originally Published at Conspiracy Archive on 2009/07/30

An article at Henry Makow’s site by Willie Martin caught my attention.

    A book overlooked by most people and published for sale mainly within the Jewish community states that the Rockefellers are Jews of Sephardic descent (meaning Spanish and Portuguese Jews). The work was published only for Jews some years ago. The work was compiled by the Jewish historian Malcolm H. Stern and entitled “Americans of Jewish Decent.”

    That book weighed 10 pounds and gave the history of 25,000 Jewish individuals in America. It is extremely interesting to note that only 550 copies of the book were printed and each copy was consecutively numbered. The book was delivered to the top Jewish community leaders in America for their personal reference files in dealing with and contacting Jews who are “Marranos” (those Jews who “PRETEND” to be Christians in their community but secretly hold to their Jewish faith and race when among their own kind.)

    Stephen Birmingham in “The Grandees” reports: “Who would expect to find the Rockefellers in the book.” Stern’s work traces what he calls the “Nobility of Jewry – the Sephardim who lived in Spain and Portugal as princes of the land.” […]

Yes, I’ve heard of Stern’s book before. It is indeed rare and only 500+ books were printed at the time. Back in 2005 (or thereabouts) I did a cursory search at AbeBooks and found two copies for sale:

    STERN, Malcolm H.
    Bookseller: Antic Hay Books
    (Asbury Park, NJ, U.S.A.) Price: US$ 2850.00
    (C$ 3293.67)
    [Convert Currency]
    Shipping within U.S.A.:
    US$ 3.50 (C$ 4.04)
    [Rates & Speeds]

    Book Description: : A COMPENDIUM OF GENEALOGY. Cincinnati, Ohio: Hebrew Union College Press, [1960, 1960. ]. Large oblong quarto, light-purple cloth. Publications Of The American Jewish Archives, Number V. Limited Edition of 550 numbered copies. A scarce title! Near Fine. Bookseller Inventory # 44244
    [Bookseller & Payment Information] [More Books from this Seller]

    Malcolm Stern
    Bookseller: Ruth Hirschfield Books
    (Brooklyn, NY, U.S.A.) Price: US$ 3000.00
    (C$ 3467.02)
    [Convert Currency]
    Shipping within U.S.A.:
    US$ 3.50 (C$ 4.04)
    [Rates & Speeds]

    Book Description: LIMITED EDITION and this is #467 out of 550. Published in 1960 . Over 300 pages. Traces the ancestry of some 25,000 American Jewish men and women from the 18th Century. Yes the Vanderbilts and the Rockefellers are there too., 1960. In very good condition save small mark on front cover. Fine paper and very heavy. A work of remarkable achievement. Bookseller Inventory # CR 1

Way too expensive for my blood. And with that I filed it away with some other research data and nearly forgot about it, until now. But after being reminded of it again, and through a few searches at Google, I have finally gotten to the bottom of the nature of the Rockefeller data in Stern’s book.

First off: the entire rare volume is now online for everyone to inspect, here.

    When it first appeared in 1960, Malcolm Stern’s Americans of Jewish Descent marked a milestone in the study of American Jewish genealogy. The Jacob Rader Marcus Center of the American Jewish Archives is proud to make the latest edition of this classic text available online.

    Researchers now have access to the complete text of Rabbi Stern’s monumental volume that was published in 1991 as the updated and revised 3rd edition entitled: First American Jewish Families: 600 Genealogies, 1654-1988. This publication is an historical document in its own right, and it is not our intention to alter it in any way. Students of American Jewish genealogy are encouraged to use this text as a basis for their research.

It’s entirely searchable; and a query for “Rockefeller” will bring up results contained on one page.

Rather than the entire family being of Jewish descent as some have implied, the Jewish blood stems from the marriage of Godfrey S. Rockefeller to Helen Gratz. Michael Collins Piper, in an apparent communication with someone who posts at Stormfront, summed it up:

    As far as the Rockefeller family is concerned it should be noted that there is no solid information indicating that they are of Jewish extraction, although there has been much speculation and rumor for over a century. Contrary to widespread perception, the often touted “proof” that “the Rockefellers are Jewish” is not proof at all. The rumor stems from the fact that author Stephen Birmingham in his book The Grandees , a profile of the history of America’s Sephardic jewish elite, mentioned that the name “Rockefeller” can be found in a rare 1960 genealogical study, Americans of Jewish Descent by Malcolm Sten.

    Although some sources jumped on that information and begin circulating the story that this was proof that the Rockefellers are of Jewish descent, a close and careful read of the entire book will demonstrate that the Rockefellers who have Jewish blood in their veins stem from the time of Godfrey Rockefeller, who married on Helen Gratz, who was Jewish. Their family members and heirs, by the way, were raised in the Episcopal Church and have had little if anything to do with Jewish or Israeli affairs.

    Godfrey Rockefeller, in fact, was from a seperate line of the Rockefeller family, descended from one of the brothers of John D. Rockefeller, Sr. and was a second cousin to the famed Rockefeller brothers – Nelson, David, Laurence, and John D. III. Thus, any traces of Jewish blood in Godfrey’s heirs cannot be ascribed to the better known branch of the Rockefeller family.

Although I hate to quote from the Stormfront site, I thought I’d include this (purported) analysis by Piper simply because the latter is no friend of the Zionists and spends much time trying to suss out the influence of Jews upon the power structure of America and beyond.

That Godfrey Rockefeller had married a woman of Jewish descent has been known for years, was never a secret, and we certainly didn’t need Stern to tells us that. The entire “revelation” in the book by the latter, consists in the Gratz family tree, and how the Rockefellers married into it. That’s it; that’s all.

But the Willie Martin article claims a more substantial Jewish pedigree:

    It was in 1492 that King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain expelled the Jews from their country and confiscated their ill-gotten wealth. It was during this period that the Rockefeller family moved to the Turkish Empire which welcomed the Jews at that time, believing them to be a “poor persecuted people.”

    The grandfather of our former Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller, admitted that his family once moved from Turkey to France. It was from France that they moved to America. John D. Rockefeller, Sr., was a wealthy man even before he took over Standard Oil Co., which made their family one of the richest in the world. No one has ever explained how this family came into such wealth as soon as they arrived in America from France.

    There is no known information on how the Rockefellers came into huge amounts of money in France. Some thing they got their money from the Rothschilds and were originally their agents in buying up Christian businesses in America.


The Rockefellers are of German descent, not Spain nor Turkey nor France, and especially not of Marrano extraction. The Wikipedia article on the family actually has a good write-up on the geneological ancestry of the Rockefellers that reflects what is now accepted by scholars:

    The name is an anglicized version of the German Rokkenfelder or Rockenfeller, meaning from Rockenfeld. The Rockefellers’ origin can be explicitly traced back to the villages of Ehlscheid, Segendorfand Fahr (all suburbanised to Neuwied, Rhineland-Palatinate).[2] These are neighbored to the small settlement of Rockenfeld – part of Neuwied’s quarter Feldkirchen.[3] In Germany, Rockenfeller is known as a family name.

    Family records in parish registers reach back to the end of the Thirty Years’ War. The earliest known ancestors (direct line) are Goddard (Gotthard) Rockenfeller (*ca. 1590) Johann Wilhelm Rockenfeller(*ca. 1628,†1702) and Johannes Rockenfeller (*ca. 1634,†1684). Johann Peter (*1682), son of Johannes, moved in 1723 to Ringoes, New Jersey. Johann Thiel (*1695), grandson of Johann Wilhelm, immigrated in 1735 to Germantown, New York. William Avery Rockefeller was looking for a noble descent and a possible connection to a French Huguenot family de Roquefeullie was discussed. However, this is unlikely because the name Rockenfeld is recorded in the region long before the Huguenots fled France (1685).[2]

    Johann Peter’s grandson, William, married a distant relative, Christina, the granddaughter of a cousin of Johann Peter. This marriage produced a son, Godfrey, who married Lucy Avery in 1806. Avery’s ancestors were part of the Puritan tide from Devon, England to Massachusetts around 1630. Lucy Avery could justly claim descent from Edmund Ironside, the English king, crowned in 1016.

    Godfrey and Lucy eventually shifted to the remote, backwater stagecoach stop of Richford, in the western part of New York State. Their son, William Avery Rockefeller (1810–1906) was a trader in salt and timber who adopted a vagabond life as a confidence man and was known as “Big Bill”, who sired two illegitimate children with his housekeeper. He married up, to Eliza Davison in 1837; her father, John Davison, was relatively rich for the time. Their second child was John Davison Rockefeller, and their third William Rockefeller.[4]

    The Rockefellers eventually settled near Cleveland, Ohio, where they would develop into the world-renowned family empire they are today. It was in Cleveland where John D. Sr. would amass his great fortune through Standard Oil which he formed with his brother William Rockefeller,Henry Flagler, chemist Samuel Andrews, and a silent partner Stephen V. Harkness., and where he would later be buried at Lake View Cemetery. In the generations since, however, the Rockefeller family has largely migrated to New York City, although many descendants remain in Cleveland or have since spread out across the country (e.g. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia). The family business headquarters is now located in New York City’s Rockefeller Plaza.

Much more interesting to me than Godfrey marrying a Jewish woman, is that he was a member of the Scroll & Key, and was involved with the Bushes and their Skull & Bones cronies:

    Godfrey S. Rockefeller, Scroll & Key 1921

    Godfrey Stillman Rockefeller was the the grandson of John D. Rockefeller’s brother William, and a son of William Goodsell Rockefeller, Yale 1892, whose cousin B. Brewster Jennings was the president of Memorial Hospital from 1958-68. (William Goodsell Rockefeller, B.A. 1892. Bulletin of Yale University. Obituary Record of Yale Graduates 1922-1923, pp. 173-174.) He was a member of Scroll & Key. (“Tap Day” at Yale Finds New Society Selecting Members. Chicago Daily Tribune, May 22, 1920.) His aunt, Emma Rockefeller, married Dr. D. Hunter McAlpin, the son of the head of the D.H. McAlpin & Co. tobacco firm in 1895, while his cousin, Joan Rockefeller, married David H. McAlpin, the grandson of Dr. McAlpin., in 1953. (Joan Rockefeller Becomes Engaged. New York Times, Nov. 17, 1952; Joan Rockefeller Wed in Greenwich. New York Times, Jun. 14, 1953.) Godfrey Rockefeller was elected a director of Benson & Hedges in 1946. (Other Company Meetings. New York Times, Apr. 12, 1946.) He exchanged his shares for those of Philip Morris in 1954. (Letter from Joseph Cullman to Rockefeller, Jan. 18, 1954.)

    Obituary Record 1922-1923 / Yale University Library (pdf, 385 pp)
    Cullman to Rockefeller, Jan. 18, 1954 / tobacco document

    Godfrey S. Rockefeller was on the board of directors of Freeport McMoRan for 50 years. He and his cousin Chauncey D. Stillman were elected together (Freeport Texas Elects 2 to Board. New York Times, Dec. 22, 1931.) He graduated from Yale in 1921, and two classmates in Skull & Bones 1921, Charles Harvey Bradley and John Sidney Acosta, were ushers at his wedding; also Henry Mali, John French Richardson Dilworth [both Scroll & Key 1921], and his brothers, William A. and J. Stillman Rockefeller. Frederick W. Lincoln was his best man, and his uncle, Percy A. Rockefeller, S&B 1900, attended. (Miss Gratz a Bride. New York Times, Jun. 27 1923.) His wife, Helen Gratz, was from St. Louis, Missouri, and Mrs. Prescott S. Bush of Columbus, Ohio, formerly Dorothy Walker of St. Louis, was supposed to have been an attendant (G.S. Rockefeller to Marry June 26. New York Times, Jun. 7, 1923.) Helen Gratz was the daughter of Benjamin Gratz. (Society. New York Times, May 6, 1923.) Mrs. Rockefeller was president of the Research In Schizophrenia Endowment (RISE), whose activists included Sen. Prescott S. Bush, Mrs. Prescott S. Bush Jr., and Dr. John Walker, S&B 1931, president of the board of managers of Memorial Hospital in New York City from 1965 to 1974. (Greenwich Fete May 4 to Aid Reasearch in Schizophrenia. New York Times, Apr. 24, 1960.) Mrs. Rockefeller also raised funds for the National Association for Mental Health, with Mrs. Albert D. Lasker as a member of her committee. (New Year’s Ball Will Take Place In Grand Central. New York Times, Dec. 9, 1963.)

    Godfrey S. Rockefeller was a limited partner in Clark, Dodge & Company from 1936 to at least 1945. (Display Ad. 36. New York Times, Jan. 1, 1936 p. 43; Display Ad 194. New York Times, Aug. 9, 1945.) He was a stockholder in the Enterprise Development Corporation, a closed investment trust of heirs of William Rockefeller and Thomas F. Ryan, whose directors included Clendenin J. Ryan, Frederic W. Lincoln, and Morehead Patterson, S&B 1920. (Trust to Supply Venture Capital. New York Times, Mar. 31, 1948.) He was chairman of the Cranston Print Works, a Rockefeller-owned textile company, since 1946. (Godfrey S. Rockefeller, Dies; Executive in Textiles Was 83. New York Times, Feb. 25, 1983.) David H. McAlpin 3d was also a partner of Clark, Dodge & Co. during those years.

    Godfrey S. Rockefeller Dies / New York Times, Feb. 25, 1983

    “Certainly the real monarch of George Bush’s Andover secret society, and George’s sponsor, was this “Rocky’s” father, ‘Godfrey S. Rockefeller.’ The latter gentleman had been on the staff of the Yale University establishment in China in 1921-22. Yale and the Rockefellers were breeding a grotesque communist insurgency with British Empire ideology; another Yale staffer there was Mao Zedong, later the communist dictator and mass murderer. While he was over in China, Papa Godfrey’s cousin Isabel had been the bridesmaid at the wedding of George Bush’s parents.” (Excerpt from George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography – Part 2 of 8.)

    George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography /



Promoting peace or assaulting Israel? The Rockefeller Brothers Fund supports groups that encourage or participate in the BDS movement

The movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel (BDS), which singles out the Jewish State among all nations to delegitimize and isolate, continues to gather steam.

The American Anthropological Association will vote on a BDS resolution in April. The University of South Florida, Northwestern and Vassar voted to boycott Israel, and a divestment campaign is underway at Columbia. This spring, Israel Apartheid Week, a BDS hate fest, is being held at college campuses around the U.S.

Seeing left-wing universities embrace the anti-Semitic movement is disappointing but not entirely surprising. But why does the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, a premier philanthropy based in Manhattan, finance non-governmental organizations intent on annihilating the Jewish state?

BDS demands "the end of Israel's occupation and colonialization" of all Arab lands, dismantling the security wall that protects Israelis from Palestinian terror and the right of return to Israel of several million descendants of original Arab refugees. In the words of Palestinian BDS leader Omar Barghouti, "A return for refugees would end Israel's existence as a Jewish state."

In 1940, the five sons of John D. Rockefeller, Jr. founded the Rockefeller Brothers Fund as "a private, family foundation helping to advance social change that contributes to a more just, sustainable and peaceful world."

With an endowment of more than $800 million and annual gift-giving of more than $30 million, RBF donates to many worthwhile organizations. But its persistent penchant for funding groups that actively support BDS against Israel raises serious concerns.

In 2015, RBF granted $140,000 to Jewish Voice for Peace. JVP supports BDS "as part of our work for freedom, justice and equality for all people," and praises Palestinians "rising up en-masse against Israel's brutal, decades-old regime of occupation, settler colonialism and apartheid." How is contributing to JVP advancing a just and durable peace?

RBF gave $50,000 in 2015 to the American Friends Service Committee's Israel program, which advocates for the Palestinian "right of return," promotes BDS initiatives at universities and holds the BDS Summer Institute "focused on building skills for divestment campaigns."

Zochrot, a pro-Palestinian organization that regards the creation of Israel as a "catastrophe," received $20,000 in 2015 from RBF. Zochrot supports "de-Zionizing Palestine," eliminating the Jewish state via implementation of the right of return.

Middle East Policy Network, aka Al-Shabaka, received $100,000 from RBF in 2015. In 2013, Al-Shabaka hosted a conference called "Political Agency for Palestinian Return," arguing that anti-Israel boycotts are "the most effective and strategic campaign for refugee return."

How does funding AFSC, Zochrot and MEPN promote a just and durable peace?

Equally compelling evidence for support of BDS exists for Middle East Children's Alliance, Grassroots Jerusalem, the Institute for Middle East Understanding and +972, which together received nearly $300,000 in 2015 from RBF.

Given the small budgets of these NGOs, these RBF grants are significant.

In 2014 and again in 2015, responding to questioning by NGO Monitor, RBF's president, Stephen Heintz, and the director of its Peacebuilding Program, Ariadne Papagapitos, denied any conflict between RBF's stated mission and its funding of groups that assault Israel's right to exist. A recent request to interview Heintz was denied, as was one for additional information beyond what is available on RBF's website.

John D. Rockefeller, the father of the dynasty, said, "Every right implies a responsibility; every opportunity, an obligation; every possession, a duty." It is certainly time for the Rockefeller Brothers Fund to recognize its obligation to act responsibly.

Dahl is a fellow with the Haym Salomon Center.


Rockefeller and Rothschilds Unite

“Though hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be unpunished.”


Proverbs 11:21

    What is the #1 product in the world that every industrial nation must have just to survive? Answer: oil and gas.

    Which nation is the world’s top oil and gas producer? Answer: United States.

“It’s all about oil.” We’ve heard it said a thousand times. But, in fact, it really is about oil—America’s oil; it’s about who owns the oil and about who gets it, and who doesn’t.

American oil and gas has purposely been locked away for over 70 years. The public was lied to and told we are “running out of oil and gas.” You’ve heard the old wives tale, haven’t you, about “peak oil?” We were told that America was forced to buy oil from the Arab sheiks, who held us economic hostage.

Then, the banker Jews—politically called “neo-cons”—who control the American oil spigot decided to make America the world’s top oil and gas nation. This would catapult the world into a New World Order. They formed an organization called the Project for a New American Century, and enlisted the help of con-men like politicians George Bush (Sr. and Jr.) and Halliburton CEO Dick Cheney (later to become Vice President of the United States).

From this auspicious start came 9/11, which enabled the U.S. to invade and seize Iraq’s enormous oil fields. Saudi Arabia assisted these evil conspirators. Seventeen of the nineteen supposed 9/11 hijackers were Moslems from Saudi Arabia.
Rothschild and Rockefeller Unite

Overseeing this, from behind the scenes, were Lord Rothschild and David Rockefeller. In 2012, they united their massive holdings and set up a new managerial team to exploit energy supplies. Suddenly, America was oil rich!

Rothschild, Rockefeller, and the Jewish oil boys are excited over future prospects. The American economy is booming. Unbridled immigration allows Mexicans and other foreigners to be employed for cheap wages in North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Utah, Montana, Oklahoma, and Texas, so the borders were made wide open.

There’s now only one obstacle to complete Rothschild-Rockefeller global control of oil and gas... Russia. Yes, Russia and Putin are gigantic competitors to America and its Jewish Masters. How to control—or destroy—Vladimir Putin, that is the question.

Putin and Russia booted out most of their Jewish oligarchs. Now it’s the Russian people who mostly are advantaged. The Russian economy, too, is booming, as oil and gas is sold by Russia both to Europe and to China. The Jews want this oil business for themselves.
America Targets Russia

This is why America and Israel overthrew the government of Ukraine, Russia’s long-time neighbor. It’s why Petro Poroshenko, whom we placed on the throne in Ukraine, and the neo-Nazi Right Sector Jews have pulled Ukraine away from Russian influence and made Ukraine dependent on America for its gas and oil.

America Targets Russia

This is why America and Israel overthrew the government of Ukraine, Russia’s long-time neighbor. It’s why Petro Poroshenko, whom we placed on the throne in Ukraine, and the neo-Nazi Right Sector Jews have pulled Ukraine away from Russian influence and made Ukraine dependent on America for its gas and oil.

{Putin has many business partners that are Jews}.


GOP Congressional Candidate: I Don’t Actually Think an International Cabal of Bankers Controls the World

But Montana’s Matt Rosendale attended a lecture by a conpiracy theorist who thinks the Rockefeller and Rothschild clans are part of a new world order.

A Montana Republican congressional candidate attended a December seminar featuring a speaker who argues that environmentalists are “domestic terrorists” and that a small group of bankers led by the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds—a Jewish family long targeted by conspiracy theorists—secretly control global politics. Sponsored by a conservative group called Defend Rural America, the event was attended by a handful of Republican legislators, including state Sen. Matt Rosendale, who last fall launched a campaign for the state’s open House seat, and state Sen. Jennifer Fielder, the vice-chairwoman of the Montana Republican party. Rosendale is one of four Republican candidates vying to replace Rep. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who is running for Senate.

The event’s main speaker was Defend Rural America’s founder Kirk MacKenzie, a former Ross Perot campaign aide who since 2011 has traveled the Mountain West giving a two-hour presentation on how the federal government and international bodies are trampling over the rights of locals—and how to fight back. Rosendale’s attendance was first reported by the Missoula Independent.

Rosendale, a first-term Republican, told Mother Jones he disagrees with MacKenzie’s statements about bankers and environmentalists. “I don’t believe that using inflammatory rhetoric on either side of a debate is productive,” he said in an email. “I try to use, and furthermore, strive to focus on the actual facts surrounding and impacting any issue.” Still, Rosendale thinks there’s a larger truth to MacKenzie’s message: “[I]t is critical for the United States to maintain our sovereignty and not surrender it to any other entity.” Rosendale is not considered the front-runner in the race, but no polls have been conducted of the current field of declared candidates.

Defend Rural America got its start two years ago when it pushed for the preservation of four dams in Northern California that were being targeted in an attempt to restore the Klamath River salmon population. DRA succeeded, and the participating counties later launched an effort to break away from the rest of California and form a new state. But MacKenzie claims to offer dissatisfied conservatives an alternative to secession, allowing them to undo federal gains by claiming jurisdiction over local lands.

State sovereignty is a major issue in Montana, where county sheriffs have pronounced themselves outside the bounds of federal gun control laws and even the former Democratic governor once filmed himself blasting government ID cards with a shotgun. But what MacKenzie is selling goes much deeper.

He argues the 16th Amendment establishing the income tax is illegitimate. (As proof, he cites the work of Red Beckman, a conspiracy theorist who wrote a book arguing that the Holocaust was God’s judgment against the Jews and who believes the New World Order controls global policy.) MacKenzie also contends that global warming is a “fraud” that has been “completely debunked,” citing the testimony of Lord Christopher Monckton, a British political activist who claims President Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery.

According to MacKenzie, the Endangered Species Act is a “fraud,” too. He insists the purportedly threatened spotted owl isn’t even a real species. And he blames recent federal power grabs in rural America on a sinister international agreement called Agenda 21. MacKenzie and others argue that “sustainable development” is a United Nations ruse to usher in a new global government.

Behind the increased federal involvement in Western lands, MacKenzie argues, is a sinister group of international bankers. MacKenzie did not specifically cite the Rockefellers and Rothschilds at the Montana event, but told attendees to watch his other training session videos for more information on bankers’ motives. At another presentation, he quoted two members of France’s Rothschild family, and told attendees that the Rockefellers were the driving force behind Agenda 21. A blurb for his economics book, Follow the Money, brags that it “concisely brings alive the war that is taking place for control of the world between representative governments, on the one hand, and a handful of international banking families on the other.” Elsewhere, he touts a document that purports to show “how the Rockefellers assimilated the emerging environmental conscientiousness into their plans for world government and centralized control.”

You can watch a video of his presentation here:


820 The Jewish ancestry of the Rockefeller family - a debate with Paul Bustion


D.C. Lawmaker Trayon White Sr: Jewish Family Controls More Than Just the Weather—Government and World Bank Too

A D.C. Councilman who was heavily criticised for alluding to a conspiracy theory that claims climate is controlled by the Rothschilds appears to have previously made similar anti-Semitic remarks regarding the prominent Jewish family.

Trayon White Sr. was forced to apologize for his comments which were posted onto Facebook claiming recent snowfall was proof that the Rothschilds are “controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities.”

Following outrage over the comments, a separate video has emerged, seen by the Washington Post, which shows White openly pushing other anti-Semitic theories involving the famous Jewish banking family turned business dynasty, including that they control the World Bank and federal government.

Speaking during a meeting involving top city officials, including Mayor Muriel E. Bowser, White said: “There’s this whole concept with the Rothschilds—control the World Bank, as we all know—infusing dollars into major cities.

“They really pretty much control the federal government, and now they have this concept called resilient cities in which they are using their money and influence into local cities.”

Elsewhere, after the president of the University of the District of Columbia finishes a presentation, White asks how much money the Rothschilds have invested into the college.

“How does this influence this? Because it’s really about infrastructure and climate control,” White said. “What does this have to do with UDC? Have they put money into UDC? What’s the relationship between the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers?”

Conspiracy theorists have often alleged that the Rothschilds, along with the Rockefeller family, have been secretly manipulating the weather by using technology.

Although White made the remarks on February 27, the official meeting footage (routinely released by the city) is only now getting attention following his comments about the Rothschilds and climate.

In a clip posted on his Facebook page from inside his car during a snowfall, White said: “Man, it just started snowing out of nowhere this morning, man. Y’all better pay attention to this climate control, man, this climate manipulation.

“And D.C. keep talking about, ‘We a resilient city.’ And that’s a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.”

After White was widely condemned by fellow council members and Jewish groups and organisations, he deleted the video and posted an apology, insisting he did not know what he was suggesting was anti-Semitic.

“I want to apologize to the Jewish Community and anyone I have offended. The Jewish community have been allies with me in my journey to help people,” he said.

“I did not intend to be Anti-Semitic, and I see I should not have said that after learning from my colleagues. I have spoke to leaders and my friends at Jews United for Justice and they are helping me to understand the history of comments made against Jews and I am committed to figuring out ways continue to be allies with them and others.”

Rebecca Ennen, deputy director of Jews United for Justice, accepted the apology while adding what he said was “hurtful and disappointing”.

“But also, that’s not the guy we know; it must be from a position of ignorance and making a mistake,” she told the Washington Post. "We feel his apology has been sincere, and we want to work with him.”


To Light The Lamps Of China

By Kevin Baker

Sino-American relations always seem to have at least a hint of the ridiculous about them, and small wonder, since they tend to be more about the images each nation projects upon the other than any objective reality. Witness the last superpower brush-up, which involved the death of a Chinese pilot who seemed most intent upon exchanging e-mails, an unacknowledged hostage crisis, and a non-apology apology from the United States.

All of this fizzled away before it could become something more tragic, but we can expect further confrontations to be just as edgy. The effort by China’s rulers to join the world’s economy—while still maintaining their dictatorial powers and asserting a regional hegemony, has left the Bush administration in a quandary. Is China to be regarded as the next great cold war threat, or our partner in globalization?

Both of these stances have their domestic attractions, which is the trouble. A belligerent China makes a useful boogeyman for those pushing for a defensive missile shield and a massive military build-up. A China looming as the world’s greatest market and one of its greatest producers is the vision dangled by those looking to abolish trade barriers and “engage” China’s dictators. Meanwhile, Americans on both the right and left wish to hold China accountable for the its ongoing persecution of religious and political dissidents.

Yet the worst scenario of all would be to regard China as what we desire it to be, as opposed to what it really is. We have done this all too often in the past, and the results have usually been disastrous.

In the 1930s and ’40s, Time magazine’s Henry Luce insisted on viewing Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuomintang through the prism of his boyhood days as a Prebyterian missionary’s son in China. Luce’s bully pulpit, sympathy for a China reeling under Japan’s brutal aggression, and the Christianity and adroit public relations skills of Madame Chiang (Mei-ling Soong), created a “China Lobby” of American columnists, politicians, businessmen, and labor organizers, all convinced that the Chiangs were about to lead their nation forward into a benevolent, Christianized, Westernized democracy.

“We shall lift Shanghai up, up forever, until it is just like Kansas City!” Nebraska Senator Kenneth Wherry promised at the height of such fervor.

Others remained more skeptical. “Too much ‘issimo’ and not enough ‘general’,” was Texas Senator Tom Connally’s pronouncement upon Chiang, but when his corrupt and unpopular regime did collapse in 1949, millions of Americans smelled betrayal.

“Who lost China?” became the new rallying cry of the China Lobby. Spearheaded now by one Alfred Kohlberg, a businessman and professional conspiracy theorist known as “the Handkerchief King,” the lobby instituted a McCarthyist witch hunt that drove one dedicated, American foreign policy officer after another out of public life, and freely accused men such as Harry Truman and George Marshall of criminal incompetence at best, and outright treason at worst.

(The China Lobby also picked up a recruit in a California congressman named Richard Nixon, who would join the “Who lost China?” chorus until just about the day he stepped on a plane to go meet Chairman Mao.)

The whole idea that the world’s most populous nation and one of its most venerable civilizations was ever ours to “win” or “lose” is one of breathtaking hubris, and we paid a steep price for it. Our inability to now view China as anything but another block of monolithic Communism, and our sudden lack of experience in the East Asian bureaus of the State Department, did much to elongate the Korean War, hasten our blunder into Vietnam, and keep China a Soviet ally for longer than it might otherwise have been.

Yet all this is a familiar story. Less well-known is the business side of it—of how we have also insisted on projecting China as the great market of our dreams.

“Oil for the lamps of China.” The very words convey a certain romance, a tantalizing quest for riches, akin to the search for the Northwest Passage, or El Dorado. Now mostly forgotten, they once fired the imaginations of business tycoons and the American public alike.

The words—and the whole idea of China as our greatest trading partner—stemmed from John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Corporation. By the early 1880s, 85 percent of the world’s crude oil was still drilled in Pennsylvania, and of that amount more than two-thirds went abroad. Oil being America’s fourth largest export—and when you said oil you meant Standard Oil.

“In the early 1870s, kerosene penetrated China, Japan, and other far-off spots, and one American traveler in 1874 saw Standard kerosene flickering in the ancient quarters of Babylon and Nineveh,” Ron Chernow wrote in Titan, his prize-winning biography of Rockefeller.

Though Standard Oil already monopolized the domestic market, it was always looking for new opportunities. In 1882, the company sent a merchant named William Herbert Libby to East Asia, where he was soon distributing pamphlets praising the safety of kerosene lamps—and the lamps themselves. Like some latter-day software developer passing out free laptops, Libby saw to it that eight million Mei Foo, or “good luck” kerosene lamps were either sold for a pittance or given away free, with millions more soon to follow.

“In many countries, we had to teach the people…to burn oil by making lamps for them;” Rockefeller wrote in his memoirs. “we packed the oil to be carried by camels or on the backs of runners in the most remote portions of the world; we adapted the trade to the needs of strange folk.”

This was, of course, an exaggeration. The “strange folk” of China had been burning oil in lamps for millenia before anyone had ever dreamed of the Standard Oil Company.

Yet Libby’s strategy was a great success. The lamps were indeed moved deep into the heart of China, in caravans of carts or on sampans. Before long, Standard Oil had broken both the monopoly on peanut oil exercised by mandarin merchants, and swept aside the prejudice village priests had against kerosene. Even when empty, the tin cans and wood frames the kerosene was packed in made useful household additions for poor Chinese peasants.

The whole endeavor seemed to be a shining example of pragmatic, Yankee ingenuity. Sell them the lamps and they will buy the fuel! “Oil for the lamps of China” soon became a byword among American businessmen and internationalists. It was even the title of a highly popular, 1932 novel, written by Alice Tisdale Hobart, an American woman who had married an oilman stationed in China.

Her story followed the rise of Stephen Chase, a young oil executive captivated by a vision of an industrialized China. In the novel, it is Chase who comes up with the idea for the Mei Foo lamps, by recalling his childhood night light.

“A tiny chimney, tiny bowl that would hold a coppers’ worth of oil! A lamp that peasants and coolies could afford to buy! Stephen smiled to himself, seeing their childish delight, remembering the pleasure they took in examining his watch, his flashlight…His dream expanded. In time the Company could put a lamp in every inn, every hut in Manchuria, in China! Four hundred million people, millions of lamps.”

Herein lay one of the very cornerstones of American optimism. The idea, tracing back to Puritans, that there need be no conflict between doing well and doing good. The Chinese would have light, China would rise, and the stockholders would get rich!

Like any good novelist, Ms. Hobart probed beneath the outlook of the annual report. As Richard O’Connor describes it in his history, The Oil Barons, Stephen Chase devolves into “a company man, completely dedicated to his career and to the higher echelon, and the Chinese world receded from his consciousness. The Chinese themselves were only faceless consumers—actors in a corporate drama.”

That corporate drama would play out a little differently, but it would indeed undermine John D. Rockefeller’s loftier ideals. Even as Standard Oil expanded into China, it was losing its worldwide monopoly on crude oil. Discoveries of massive deposits at Baku and elsewhere soon made it clear that the world’s oil had not all been providentially placed in western Pennsylvania.

Before long, companies led by Sweden’s famous Nobel brothers, the Rothschilds, and the Anglo-Dutch combine of Shell Oil and Royal Dutch, were drawing on enormous new fields and refineries from the Black Sea to the Dutch East Indies, and challenging Standard Oil’s hegemony around the world. By the 1890s, Russian crude oil production would even briefly surpass that of the U.S., and Rockefeller responded to the challenge with alacrity—and some less than savory methods. Trying to create alarm in Russia’s main superpower rival, Standard Oil hired British solicitors to spread rumors of a cabal under “Hebrew influence” who were trying to take Russian tankers through the Suez Canal.

Rockefeller himself railed against “our Asiatic competitors controlled by Jewish men who cry ‘Wolf! Wolf! Standard Oil Company!’ and keep moving in and getting control of markets,” and contrasted Standard Oil’s “fair-minded” practices with “the old, old, Jew method of treating one customer one way and another in another [way].”

This took considerable chutzpah, coming as it did from a man who had built his own company in good part by concluding secret, illegal preferential rate deals with American railroads. It was also disingenuous; the Rothschilds had been on the verge of reaching a deal with Standard Oil before it was scotched by Count Sergie Witte, Russia’s finance minister.

Much to Rockefeller’s chagrin, he would have to share the Asian market with Jewish and non-Jewish men alike (and soon, thanks to Teddy Roosevelt, the American market as well). Chinese peasants proved to know a little bit about capitalism themselves, and before long many of them were burning cheaper, Shell oil in their good-luck lamps. Finally, the civil and foreign wars that would soon convulse China for decades, followed by the Communist takeover, would prevent the Middle Kingdom from ever quite developing into the surefire market that the Rockefellers and the Stephen Chases had envisioned.

Another Rockefeller venture in China would prove more enduring. As part of its immensely beneficial, worldwide program of medical research and disease control, the Rockefeller Foundation opened the Peking Union Medical College in 1921. Even after being nationalized by the Communists the college, in Chernow’s words, “introduced a generation of Chinese doctors to modern medicine.”

The lesson in all this, perhaps, is that we deal best with China as we do with all countries, when we are clear in our motives and objectives. We only set ourselves up for disappointment when we insist upon seeing China and the Chinese as something infinitely fungible, capable of being whatever we want it to be, when we want it. We need to remember that we’re not in Kansas City anymore.


Rothschild Conspiracy: Do They Rule The World?



Jacob Schiff was born in 1847 in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, to Moses and Clara (née Niederhofheim) Schiff, members of a distinguished Ashkenazi Jewish rabbinical family that traced its lineage in Frankfurt back to 1370. His father, Moses Schiff, was a broker for the Rothschilds. Jacob Schiff, was born in the Rothschild house at 148 Judengasse, Frankfort, which the Rothschilds shared with the Schiff family. In 1875, Jacob Schiff arrived from Frankfurt to join the firm Kuhn Loeb. He married Therese, the founder Solomon ’s daughter. He also brought a large amount of Rothschild capital into the firm, enabling it to expand tenfold. In 1885, Loeb retired; Jacob Schiff ran the firm from 1885 to 1920, when he died.

Jacob Schiff wasn’t just another Rothschild agent He was practically family

Although Jacob Schiff’s personal agent, George Kennan, had regularly toured Russia during the latter part of the nineteenth century, bringing in money and arms for the Communist revolutionaries (his grandson said that Schiff had spent $20 million to bring about the Bolshevik Revolution Source February 3, 1949 issue of the New York Journal American )  more concerted aid was called for to support an entire regime.

In 1915, the American International Corporation was formed in New York. Its principal goal was the coordination of aid, particularly financial assistance, to the Bolsheviks which had previously been provided by Schiff and other bankers on an informal basis.

The Rockefeller family is sometimes called the first family of the Soviet Union. When Nelson Rockefeller was nominated for vice president in 1967, Pravda indignantly denounced his critics. When David Rockefeller’s plane lands in Russia, crowds line up to greet him at the airport, and line the streets of Moscow as his limousine passes, hailing him with cries of RAHK FAWLER.

The new firm was funded by J.P. Morgan, the Rockefellers, and the National City Bank. Chairman of the Board was Frank Vanderlip, former president of National City, and member of the Jekyll Island group which wrote the Federal Reserve Act in 1910; directors were

    Pierre du Pont
    Otto Kahn of Kuhn, Loeb Co.
    George Herbert Walker, grandfather of Vice President George H. Bush
    William Woodward, director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
    Robert S. Lovett, right hand man of the Harriman / Kuhn, Loeb Union Pacific Railroad
    Percy Rockefeller
    John DiRyan
    J.A. Stillman [Jr.], son of James Stillman principal organizer of the National City Bank
    A.H. Wiggin
    Beekman Winthrop

The 1928 list of AIC directors included Percy Rockefeller, Pierre DuPont, Elisha Walker of Kuhn, Loeb Co.,and Frank Altschul of Lazard Freres

In their program of aiding the Communists, AIC worked closely with Guaranty Trust of New York (now Morgan Guaranty Trust). Guaranty Trust’s directors in 1903 included

    George F. Baker, founder of the First National Bank
    August Belmont, representative of the Rothschilds
    E.H. Harriman, founder of Union Pacific Railroad, former vice president of the U.S.
    Levi Morton, who was a director of U.S. Steel and the Union Pacific
    Henry H. Rogers, partner of John D. Rockefeller in Standard Oil, also a director of Union Pacific
    H. McK. Twombly, who married the daughter of William Vanderbilt, and was now the director of fifty banks and industries
    Frederick W. Vanderbilt
    Harry Payne Whitney

The Leninists quickly exhausted the funds advanced by the Germans when they reached Russia, and once again the Bolshevik bid for absolute power seemed in doubt. To whom should Lenin turn but his powerful friend in the White House? Wilson promptly sent Elihu Root, Kuhn Loeb lawyer and former Secretary of State, to Russia with $20 million from his Special War Fund, to be given to the Bolsheviks (not the provinsial Government of Kerensky). This was revealed in Congressional Hearings on Russian Bonds, HJ 8714.U5, which shows the financial statement of Woodrow Wilson’s expenditure of the $100 million voted him by Congress as a Special War Fund. The statement, showing the expenditure of $20 million in Russia by Root’s Special War Mission to Russia, is also recorded in the Congressional Record, Sept. 2, 1919, as given by Wilson’s secretary, Joseph Tumulty.

Not to be outdone in generosity, J.P. Morgan & Co. also rushed financial assistance to the beleaguered Lenin terrorists. Col. Raymond Robins headed a Red Cross Mission to Russia. Henry P. Davison, J.P. Morgan’s righthand man (also a member of the Jekyll Island team which secretly wrote the Federal Reserve Act in 1910), had raised $370 million in cash for the Red Cross during World War I, of which several millions were brought to the Russians by Robins team. Aiding him in this charitable work were Frank Vanderlip, chairman of American International Corp., and William Boyce Thompson, another director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Despite a later reputation for “anti-Communism”, Herbert Hoover was not only the most tireless proponent of the League of Nations in partnership with Col. House; he also was the first American to step in with large scale assistance to prevent a massive uprising against the faltering Bolshevik regime. Hoover saved the Bolsheviks by organizing a massive program to rush food to the beleaguered Communists. On Nov. 28, 1917, his associate, Col. House had cabled Wilson a few days after the Bolsheviks seized power, urging the extreme importance of suppressing all American newspaper criticism of the Bolsheviks: “It is exceedingly important that such criticism be suppressed.” The telegram was placed in a confidential file, and only came to light six years later.

John McGregor Grant ‘s operations in Russia were financed by Olaf Aschberg of Nya Banken, Stockholm, who had transmitted large sums furnished by the Warburgs for the Bolshevik Revolution; the London agent  of Nya Banken was the British Bank of North Commerce, whose chairman was Earl Grey, a close associate of Cecil Rhodes – Grant had been blacklisted

Morgan Rockefeller Rothschild links

For more than a century, a widespread belief has been deliberately fostered in the United States that the Rothschilds were of little significance in the American financial scene. With this cover, they have been able to manipulate political and financial developments in this country to their own advantage. In 1837, the Rothschilds let their American representative, W.L. & M.S. Joseph, go bankrupt in the Crash, while they threw their cash reserves behind a newcomer, August Belmont, and their secret representative, George Peabody of London.After 1837, August Belmont (Schönberg) was publicly advertised in the financial press as the American representative of the Rothschild’s.

George Peabody had established his business in England through his
connection with Brown Bros. (now Brown Bros. Harriman and Brown, Shipley). He had become an unidentified agent for Rothschild as early as 1835.

As George Peabody had no son to take over his firm, he took on Junius Morgan as partner; Junius’ son John Pierpont Morgan, became known as “the most powerful banker in the world”, although his principal role was to secretly carry out commissions for the House of Rothschild.

The New York Times, Oct. 26, 1907, noted in connection with J.P. Morgan’s actions during the Panic of 1907, “In conversation with the New York Times correspondent, Lord Rothschild paid a high tribute to J.P. Morgan . ‘He is worthy of his reputation as a great financier and a man of wonders. His latest action fills one with admiration and respect for him.’ ”This is the only recorded instance when a Rothschild praised any banker outside of his own family.

On March 28, 1932, the New York Times noted, “London : N.M. Victor
Rothschild, twenty-one-year-old nephew of Baron Rothschild, is going to the United States soon to take a post with J.P. Morgan & Co., it was learned tonight.

The Morgan-Rothschild connection explains the otherwise incomprehensible mystery of why J.P. Morgan, famed as “the most powerful banker in the world”, left such a modest fortune at his death in 1913, a mere $11 million after his debts were secured. Although the present members of the Morgan family seem financially secure, none of them is counted among the “big rich”.

The Rockefeller dynasty arose from a conman an actual  snake oil salesman named William Rockefeller Sr. The Rockefeller’s (at least the men) came from Germany

At no time has the House of Rothschild ever indicated publicly that it had any interest in the firm of Kuhn, Loeb Co. George R. Conroy stated in TRUTH magazine, Boston, Dec. 16, 1912,

    “Mr. Schiff is head of the great private banking house of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., which represents the Rothschild interests on this side of the Atlantic. He has been described as a financial strategist and has been for years the financial minister of the great impersonal power known as Standard Oil. He was hand-in-glove with the Harrimans, the Goulds and the Rockefellers in all their railroad enterprises”

Source A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism


Joseph Mandel House (Col House) and his secretary Kenneth Durant

The omnipotent Jewish prophet Col House sent his secretary Kenneth Durant to Russia Durant, to become a secretary in the Soviet Bureau in 1920 !

Durant became press secretary to the unrecognized Soviet envoy to the United States. From 1923 to 1944, he headed the American branch of Soviet news agency  (TASS). Employees at TASS included the jewish journalist  Eugene Lyons who was instrumental in covering up the Holodomor from Americans

Durant had also attended the Versailles Peace conference as Col House’s aide though no one knows in what capacity the mysterious Joseph Mandel House attended the Peace Conference

When Trotsky was arrested in Halifax Canada mysterious forces both in England and the United States, intervened on Trotsky’s behalf.  The head of the British Secret Service in America at the time was Sir William Wiseman, who, as fate would have it, occupied the apartment directly above the apartment of Edward Mandell House. House advised Wiseman, that President Wilson wished to have Trotsky released. Wiseman advised his government and the British Admiralty issued orders on April 21st, that Trotsky was to be sent on his way. (“Why Did We Let Trotsky Go? How Canada Lost an Opportunity to Shorten the War”, MacLeans magazine, Canada, June 1919. Also see Martin, pp. 163-164.) Trotsky was not arrested on a whim. He was recognized as a threat to the best interests of England, Canada’s mother country . He was arrested as a German agent and taken as a prisoner of war.

Authors Antony C. Sutton and Gary Allen with Larry Abraham  wrote  two well hyped and marketed pieces of propaganda

Wall Street and the  Bolshevik Revolution by Antony Sutton and None dare call it conspiracy by  Gary Allen with Larry Abraham

Both books seek to completely cover up the Jewish role in financing of the Bolshevik revolution Just check out how easily and cheaply they are available in online  ebook stores like Amazon.

Heres Sutton on the Jewish role in the Bolshevik revolution

    The persistence with which the Jewish–conspiracy myth has been pushed suggests that it may well be a deliberate device to divert attention from the real issues and the real causes. The evidence provided in this book suggests that the New York bankers who were also Jewish had relatively minor roles in supporting the Bolsheviks, while the New York bankers who were also Gentiles (Morgan, Rockefeller, Thompson) had major roles.What better way to divert attention from the real operators than by the medieval bogeyman of anti-Semitism?‘ Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution Apendix 2 The Jewish-conspiracy theory of the Bolshevik revolution

And here are Allen and Abraham on the Jewish role

    One major reason for the historical blackout on the role of the international bankers in political history is that the Rothschilds were Jewish. Anti-Semites have played into the hands of the conspiracy by trying to portray the entire conspiracy as Jewish. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The traditionally Anglo-Saxon J. P. Morgan and Rockefeller international banking institutions have played a key role in the conspiracy. None dare call it a conspiracy

The Jewish High Finance had been planning and working at :utterly destroying” the Russian Tsardom and the Romanovs Their street rabble Bolshevik coreligionists with a sprinkling of educated rabbinical leaders were the tools to bring about the “utter destruction” of the Romanov’s

Their WASP fronts like the Rockefeller’s and Morgans were just cover to hide the true principals financing of the “Russian Revolution”

Flanders says:   
August 10, 2018 at 5:50 am   

For many years otherwise knowledgeable and responsible Americans were blindsided with propaganda that communism was “generic” and the jews were rarely mentioned despite being the overwhelming presence and instigators of communism within America and the entire world. The main ones responsible for the failure to identify jewry as the primary communists rested with Robert Welch and his Freemason leadership within the John Birch Society.

Excerpted from the book Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullins, chapter 10: — begin excerpt —
“The Rockefellers also wielded a crucial role through their financing of the Trotskyite Communist group in the United States, the League for Industrial Democracy, whose directors include such staunch “anti-communists” as Jeanne Kirkpatrick and Sidney Hook.

“The Rockefellers were also active on the “right-wing” front through their sponsorship of the John Birch Society. To enable Robert Welch, a 32nd degree Mason, to devote all of his time to the John Birch Society, Nelson Rockefeller purchased his family firm, the Welch Candy Company, from him at a handsome price. Welch chose the principal officers of the John Birch Society from his acquaintances at the Council On Foreign Relations.
“For years afterwards, American patriots were puzzled by the consistent inability of the John Birch Society to move forward on any of its well-advertised “anti-Communist” goals. The fact that the society had been set up at the behest of the backers of the world Communist revolution may have played some role in this development. Other patriots wondered why most American conservative writers, including the present writer, were steadily blacklisted by the John Birch Society for some thirty years.”
Flanders says:   
August 10, 2018 at 6:07 am   

Many jews have actively taken part in a campaign to hide from the American people the major role that jewry has played in communism. That campaign has included portraying communism as being a “plain Jane” generic communism, and presenting a public front which hid that communism directly resulted from it’s heavily jewish-blooded instigation and participation. Very few Americans of earlier times were aware about jewry, or the fact that communism was basically jewish. Americans did not know that jewish control of much of the “American” media prevented them from knowing that, and it was hidden from them. Communism is very monolithic in the nature of it’s control and it is spread by international jewry, most notably by those of jewry who are often extreme “capitalists” and financiers. Communism and jewry operate as an international state.

This is from a 31 page 1956 booklet which tells how jewry has hidden the communist activities undertaken by many jews in America from the American public, “JEWISH “ANTI-COMMUNISM”,
By George Pinckney.

“SECTION I. In February, 1916, it was first discovered that a
revolution was being fomented in Russia. It was found that the fol-
lowing persons, as well as the banking houses mentioned, were en-
gaged in this work of destruction; Jacob Sciff, Guggenheim, Max
Breiting, Kuhn, Loeb &Co., Jewish banking houses of which the fol-
lowng are directors: Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mor-
timer Schiff, S. H. Hannauer. (All Jewish.)

SECTION 2. In the spring of 1917 Jacob Schiff began to supply
funds to Trotsky (Bronstein) to bring about the social revolution in
Russia. The New York “Daily Forward”, which is a Judeo-Bolshe^ic
organ, gave a subscription for the same cause.”


VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario

“Will you walk into my parlour?” said the Spider to the Fly,
‘Tis the prettiest little parlour that ever you did spy;
The way into my parlour is up a winding stair,
And I’ve a many curious things to shew when you are there.”
Oh no, no,” said the little Fly, “to ask me is in vain, For who goes up your winding stair can ne’er come down again.” Spider and the Fly

Eugenics: the study of methods of improving the quality of the human race, esp by selective breeding. The science of improving a breed or species through the careful selection of parents, …good in stock, hereditarily endowed with noble qualities.

– coined in 1883 by Francis Galton in his Inquiries into the Human Faculty and Its Development.

Just who is pulling the strings? Many political analysts believe the Rockefeller Foundation wields more power behind the scenes than most formally elected governments. One aspect in particular raises many concerns – their influence over the course of the Pharmaceutical Industry; having monopolized every major Drug Company Board of Directors & powerful lobby group vying for drug/vaccine research & development. In addition historically the Rockefeller family financed the Eugenics movement long before the rise of Hitler’s Third Reich with substantial donations to the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Germany.

In America they were on the vanguard of advanced medical & scientific research.

‘J.D. Rockefeller and Averell Harriman, a business partner of Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker in Brown Brothers Harriman, gave $11 million to create the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Built on Manhattan property owned by the Dulles brothers, it spawned America’s ground-breaking “eugenics” research and the world’s first “racial hygiene” laws.

By 1907, Rockefeller funding was heavily influencing America’s medical institutions. The Rockefeller Institute created the first genetics lab in 1909. The following year, the Eugenics Research Association and the Eugenics Records Office were founded near Cold Spring Harbor, New York, on land donated by the widow of Averell Harriman. In 1911, John Foster Dulles summed up eugenics, saying that by eliminating “the weakest members of the population” a purer race could be created.’

Rockefellers & the roots of Eugenics: ‘America funded Germany’s eugenic institutions. By 1926, Rockefeller had donated some $410,000 — almost $4 million in 21st-Century money — to hundreds of German researchers. In May 1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 to the German Psychiatric Institute of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, later to become the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry.

Among the leading psychiatrists at the German Psychiatric Institute was Ernst Rüdin, who became director and eventually an architect of Hitler’s systematic medical repression.

Another in the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute’s eugenic complex of institutions was the Institute for Brain Research. Since 1915, it had operated out of a single room. Everything changed when Rockefeller money arrived in 1929. A grant of $317,000 allowed the Institute to construct a major building and take center stage in German race biology. The Institute received additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation during the next several years. Leading the Institute, once again, was Hitler’s medical henchman Ernst Rüdin. Rüdin’s organization became a prime director and recipient of the murderous experimentation and research conducted on Jews, Gypsies and others.’

Research on the H1N1 Virus/Bacterium hybrid for bioweaponry purposes traces back to a little known Rockefeller funded project. During 1942 the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, centered in Princeton, New Jersey, undertook a major study titled ‘Synergistic Action Of Haemophilus Influenzae Suis And The Swine influenza Virus On The Chick Embryo’ led by Frederik B. Bang, M.D. through the Department of Animal and Plant Pathology.

The darker implications of their discovery, the harnessing of animal-human live viruses & bacterium for bio-weaponry purposes (H1N1/H1N2 Swine flu + H5N1/H7N9 Bird flu + H3N2 Human flu + Bacteria (Haemophilus influenzae/Mycoplasma) = Pandemic) cannot be ignored given the Rockefeller history of involvement in the eugenics movement; suggesting more than just a benign generosity of enlightened philanthropists at work.

“We have found that the combined infection of embryos with swine influenza virus and H. infl~nzae suis produces a highly lethal infection, while neither one alone kills many embryos. Infection with the virus allows the Hemophilus to persist longer than it does in normal embryos.

Finally the combined infection has a selective destructive effect on the embryo lungs.” Frederik B. Bang, M.D/1942

Summary: ‘The synergistic effect of Haemophilus influenzae suis and swine influenza virus in the pig can be reproduced by the inoculation of these agents on the chorioallantoic membrane of 9 to 10 day old chick embryos. Two strains of human influenza virus that were studied failed to substitute for the swine virus in the synergistic reaction. No loss of synergistic effect was noted when the swine influenza virus was put through 11 chick embryo passages. Recently isolated and old stock strains of Hemophilus were equally able to enhance the effect of the virus. Heat-killed cultures of H. influenzae suis can be substituted for the bacterial component of the reaction. Infection of the embryo with swine influenza virus predisposes to infection with H. influenzae suis.

The combination of H. influenzae suis and swine influenza virus causes a selective destruction of the embryo lungs, not produced by the individual components. This pneumonia exhibits the essential features of the natural disease.’

The Rockefeller Foundation continued to finance this ‘species jumping’ bacterium-virus hybrid component, now described as Atypical Pneumonia associated with acute upper respiratory disease. Several months following Dr. Frederick Bang’s discovery of the synergistic effect of Haemophilus influenzae suis and swine, Dr. Monroe Eaton, under the watch of the US Army Medical Department at Fort Bragg, identified ’pulmonary lesions (in infected chick embryo tissues) which were similar to those seen after instillation of infective human material’; in the process uncovering the insidious bacterial agent known as Mycoplasma – ‘the smallest free-living microorganisms…innately resistant to antibiotics.’

This marked a turning point in the biological warfare program, as Mycoplasma have no cell walls, rendering them particularly difficult to eradicate ‘in immunosuppressed or immunodeficient individuals.’ They had successfully isolated a potentially deadly bacterial strain which targets multiple species; essentially the missing link in the production of a binary weapon capable of mass proliferation in the host.

‘In December 1942, 2 months after the CARD (Commission on Acute Respiratory Diseases) laboratory was activated at Fort Bragg, Dr. Monroe Eaton and his associates at the Research Laboratory of the California State Department of Public Health reported that an infectious agent from cases of atypical pneumonia could be transmitted to cotton rats and to chick embryos. Passage in cotton rats yielded confusing results, raising the possibility of contamination with an indigenous agent. However, the agent propagated in chick embryos was specifically neutralized by convalescent sera from patients with atypical pneumonia. These studies continued with support of the Commission on Influenza (and the International Division of the Rockefeller Foundation) and were reported in greater detail in 1944. The agent, also thought by Eaton to be a virus, was now referred to as the Eaton agent.

A major advance was reported in 1955 by Dr. Chien Liu, who teamed up with Dr. Eaton, now in the Department of Bacteriology and Immunology of Harvard Medical School. He applied the fluorescein-labeled antibody technique developed by Dr. Albert H. Coons of that department to studies of Eaton agent in chick embryos. Antigen of the agent, still considered to be a virus, was consistently found in the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells lining the lower trachea, bronchi, and air sacs. Interestingly, no antigen was demonstrable in the bronchial epithelium of cotton rats. Between 1954 and 1956, seven strains of “virus” were isolated from patients with atypical pneumonia; one strain was isolated from the frozen lung of a patient who died at the Boston City Hospital in 1943. All isolates were antigenically closely related to or identical with Eaton’s original Mac strain.’ Commission on Acute Respiratory Diseases, US Army Medical Department

‘The agent propagated in chick embryos was specifically not neutralized by the acute-phase specimens.’ Studies on The Etiology of Primary Atypical Pneumonia/1944 June 1, Monroe D. Eaton, Gordon Meiklejohn, and William van Herick

Note: ‘First thought to be a virus, Eaton’s agent was proved to be a Mycoplasma species in 1961.’ Medscape

‘We identified four patients (mean age 56 years), all of whom had contact with poultry 3—8 days before disease onset. They presented with fever and rapidly progressive pneumonia that did not respond to antibiotics. Patients were leucopenic and lymphopenic, and had impaired liver or renal function, substantially increased serum cytokine or chemokine concentrations, and disseminated intravascular coagulation with disease progression…Cross species poultry-to-person transmission of this new reassortant H7N9 virus is associated with severe pneumonia and multiorgan dysfunction in human beings. Monitoring of the viral evolution and further study of disease pathogenesis will improve disease management, epidemic control, and pandemic preparedness.’ Human infections with the emerging avian influenza A H7N9 virus from wet market poultry: clinical analysis and characterisation of viral genome (25/05/2013)

Note: ‘…rapidly progressive pneumonia that did not respond to antibiotics (Mycoplasma).’

HCG hormone & population control: ‘In 1989 research was conducted by the National Institute of Immunology in New Delhi India on the use of ‘carriers’ such as Tetanus Toxoid and Diphtheria to bypass the immune system and deliver the female hormone called human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). The research paper was carried in the Oxford University Press in 1990 and was titled “Bypass by an alternate ‘carrier’ of acquired unresponsiveness to hCG upon repeated immunization with tetanus-conjugated vaccine.”

While hCG is required to maintain pregnancy, the injection of hCG bound to Tetanus Toxoid triggers an auto-immune response, thus causing sterilization. The NII research cited above used four women as test subjects – who had been surgically sterilized prior to the experiment – and found that multiple doses of the Tetanus Toxoid hCG carrier vaccine was required in order to achieve the desired results. Research also found that if an alternate carrier such as Diphtheria was used as a booster in combination with Tetanus the sterilization vaccine would be more effective.’

We now know the Tetanus shots given in the 1990’s were contaminated with Immune-Suppressant Contraceptive in the form of hCG, a hormone crucial to female fertility balance. By inserting hCG next to a deadly live virus into the body the immune system reacts to both intruders as hostile. The end result saw hundreds of thousands of healthy women inadvertently sterilized by the shots.

‘During the early 1990s, the World Health Organization had been overseeing massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in a number of countries, among them Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. In October 1994, HLI received a communication from its Mexican affiliate, the Comite’ Pro Vida de Mexico, regarding that country’s anti-tetanus campaign. Suspicious of the campaign protocols, the Comite’ obtained several vials of the vaccine and had them analyzed by chemists.

Some of the vials were found to contain human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a pregnancy. Only women were vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49).’

‘A priest, president of Human Life International (HLI) based in Maryland, has asked Congress to investigate reports of women in some developing countries unknowingly receiving a tetanus vaccine laced with the anti-fertility drug human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). If it is true, he wants Congress to publicly condemn the mass vaccinations and to cut off funding to UN agencies and other involved organizations. The natural hormone hCG is needed to maintain pregnancy. The hormone would produce antibodies against hCG to prevent pregnancy. In the fall of 1994, the Pro Life Committee of Mexico was suspicious of the protocols for the tetanus toxoid campaign because they excluded all males and children and called for multiple injections of the vaccine in only women of reproductive age. Yet, one injection provides protection for at least 10 years.

The Committee had vials of the tetanus vaccine analyzed for hCG. It informed HLI about the tetanus toxoid vaccine. HLI then told its World Council members and HLI affiliates in more than 60 countries. Similar tetanus vaccines laced with hCG have been uncovered in the Philippines and in Nicaragua. In addition to the World Health Organization (WHO), other organizations involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine using hCG include the UN Population Fund, the UN Development Programme, the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State universities. The priest objects that, if indeed the purpose of the mass vaccinations is to prevent pregnancies, women are uninformed, unsuspecting, and unconsenting victims.’

‘Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) is a hormone produced in pregnancy that is made by the developing embryo after conception and later by the placenta. Its role is to prevent disintegration of the hormonal structure of the ovaries and thereby maintains progesterone production that is critical for pregnancy in women. hCG also affects the immune tolerance of the pregnancy.

Ironically, the hCG hormone the researchers are trying to destroy is actually used during female infertility treatments in order to stimulate the release of eggs from the ovaries. Temporary depression and disruption of hCG causes a range of hormonal imbalances and is considered a leading cause of miscarriages. Consequently, many once infertile women may suddenly conceive with repeated injections of hCG.

One of the primary reasons that women who abuse cocaine can no longer conceive is because of hCG disruption. Cocaine inhibits hCG concentrations in maternal circulation which affects secretion by the placenta required to maintain pregnancy.

The biological processes of how hCG disrupts pregnancy also differ between different species so translating biological mechanisms from animal testing to humans is redundant. Regardless, drug studies continue to use these results if the conclusions/outcome are favourable to their objectives.’

The latest hCG Recombinant vaccine has just been proposed for “family planning” (aka Eugenics) in India. History is about to repeat itself: ‘Possibility and potential of a vaccine against human chorionic gonadotropin for family planning: The population of the world is continuing to grow and is projected to reach 7 billion by 2012, according to the 2008 revision of the official United Nations population estimates and projections (UN Population Division/DESA). India has a population of 1.16 billion and it is growing at the rate of 1.548% (15.5 millions per year according to 2009 estimate) every year, which is roughly equal to the entire population of Australia. This many extra numbers pose demands for food, water, education and jobs. India has 2.4% of geographical area of the world, whereas its population is 15% of the world’s population. We are already about six times over populated. Leave aside land, water essential for life and agriculture is becoming scarce day by day. Although efforts are being made to harness water resources and enhance productivity of the land, there is need to limit the size of the family voluntarily by providing safe and acceptable methods for family planning.’ Trials: ‘The efficacy of the vaccine to prevent pregnancy was high with only one pregnancy recorded in 1224 cycles above 50 ng/ml…efficacy above 90% is required and desirable.’

Rockefeller Foundation eugenics-based research conducted in the 1960’s, called the Population Program: ‘Research is principally in the fields of human biology, reproductive physiology, immunology, and molecular biology, and its basic purpose is to discover efficient, safe and low-cost methods for the control of fertility.’ Rockefeller Foundation Year end Review/1968

The Rockefeller Foundation recently published “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development’; an in depth examination of society under various degrees/types of dictatorial ‘governance’ –  the implications that, given a total societal collapse, humans would willingly relinquish their already limited freedoms in exchange for manageable order; a grave reminder of how the so called ‘useless eaters’ or ‘bottom feeders’ are perceived by the elites, as essentially passive & malleable, subject to conditioning on a flowchart. The Rockefeller vision, a dystopic clinical analysis of human behavior in response to a major pandemic leaves little doubt as to the ultimate purpose behind the veil of misguided over-reaching philanthropy.

Excerpt from study: Scenario Narratives: LOCK STEP – A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback:

In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults.

However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter postpandemic recovery.

China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.

At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.

Technology trends and applications we might see:

• Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent.”

• In the aftermath of pandemic scares, smarter packaging for food and beverages is applied first by big companies and producers in a business-to-business environment, and then adopted for individual products and consumers.

• New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many diseases.

• Tele-presence technologies respond to the demand for less expensive, lowerbandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel is restricted.

• Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China’s firewalls. Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but these efforts nevertheless fracture the “World Wide” Web.

USC Sec. 1524/TITLE 50 – WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE: CHAPTER 32 (CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM): ‘The Secretary of Defense may enter into agreements with the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide support for vaccination programs of the Secretary of Health and Human Services in the United States through use of the excess peacetime biological weapons defense capability of the Department of Defense.’

“The use of pharmacological agents to produce a calm behavioral state, particularly as relevant to management of individuals and/or groups that are agitated, aggressive and/or violent, is a topic with high relevance to achieving the mission of law enforcement and military communities. The extensive review conducted on the medical literature and new developments in the pharmaceutical industry has confirmed the relevance and high potential impact of calmatives as a non-lethal technique. Whether used alone or as an adjuvant to enhance the effectiveness of other types of non-lethal techniques, pharmacological agents can effectively act on the central nervous system tissues and produce a less anxious, less aggressive, more tranquil-like behavior and ultimately, an easier to manage individual.” Excerpt from Declassified Pentagon Psychopharmacological Weapons Program Report: ‘The Advantages and Limitations of Calmatives for Use as a Non-Lethal Technique‘ College of Medicine, Applied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania  State University

CIA DECLASSIFIED & REDACTED MK:ULTRA DOCUMENT ON IMMOBILIZING/SUBDUING/CONTROLLING INDIVIDUALS, KNOWN AS THE “K” PROBLEM  – ‘There exists within the Agency (CIA) a continuing requirement from the Operating Divisions for a substance or substances that will render an individual or animal helpless and immobile, either consciously or unconsciously, until definite control measures can be instituted. The instances and situations where such an advantage can be utilized are too numerous to be mentioned. Within TTS/CD (Technical Services Staff/Chemical Division) this problem has been designated the “K” (Knockout) problem.’

1. The Experimental Evaluation of Sedative Agents

a. Tick Paralysis: Certain species of ticks (genus Dermacentor) have been incriminated in a clinical syndrome commonly referred to as “tick paralysis”. This syndrome occurs both in man and animals. it results from a tick bite and is characterized by ascending flaccid paralysis of the musculature…The byproduct of Project Naomi, a sizeable amount of the neurotropic substance is being isolated. The development and experimental evaluation of this substance as a sedative agent will be carried out within the scope of this “K” Problem project.

b. Narcotic Effect of Fatty Acids: As a result of preliminary investigations carried out within MK:ULTRA Subproject 57 (‘ostensibly’ terminated 31 May 1957).it was found that the parenteral administration of fatty acids induced a state of unconsciousness in small animals which when examined by electroencephalogram techniques turned out to be similar to ordinary sleep. The length of narcosis varied with the dose of fatty acid administered. of extreme interest is the fact that fatty acids, unlike other narcotic agents, are normal constituents of the diet and body tissues. investigation will be carried out of mechanism of fatty acid narcosis, effective modes of administration other than parenteral (ie. oral, respiratory), additional fatty acids (short or long chain, saturated or unsaturated).

c. Assay of New Sedative Agents: in the absence of a pharmacological definition of sleep, evaluation of sedative action has been conducted at different levels of this state, ranging from sleep itself to hypnosis, and even to general anesthesia…To utilize effectively the sedative agents available, both tested and untested, requires the development of a systematic method of testing and a systematic method of characterizing the drug, both in terms of the symptomatology produced and in terms of describing potency in producing given effects by means of standardized and valid statistical procedures.

2. Incapacitating Agents: As a result of animal testing procedures, a number of centrally acting skeletal muscle relaxants have been found. Several are or have been evaluated clinically in man with varying results. Occasionally, clinical reports appear claiming that certain pharmacological agents that have minimal relaxant effects in some experimental animal preparations produce dramatic relief of spasticity in man. Clinical impressions are the usual criteria of effectiveness. There exists the opportunity for clinical evaluations of some centrally acting skeletal relaxants on the therapeutic relief of spasticity in man.

FAILED DRUGS RECYCLED: “Often, an unwanted side effect…will terminate the development of a promising new pharmaceutical compound. However, in the variety of situations in which non-lethal techniques are used, there may be less need to be concerned with unattractive side-effects…Perhaps the ideal calmative has already been synthesized and is awaiting renewed interest from its manufacturer.” Pentagon Psychopharmacological Weapons Program

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries.” David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure–one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” David Rockefeller’s ‘Memoirs’

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” David Rockefeller

“The world has a cancer, and that cancer is man.” Merton Lambert, former spokesman for the Rockefeller Foundation

Nanotechnology represents the cornerstone of 21st Century advanced scientific research, but once again indicates a hubris & fundamental disregard for nature; and a gross miscalculation of nature’s retaliatory instinct. Natural immunity will have no place in this so called “brave new world”. The Trans-humanist Elites financing this dark revolution believe they will one day merge with the machine, in the wake of humanity’s orchestrated demise…a fate they have crafted for generations from behind closed doors, with nothing but malace in their withered hearts. Love & life will ultimately endure, and our hopes for a bright future will never be blown asunder by these misguided control freaks…and in the end Nature will once again prevail.

‘One concern about nanotechnology’s unintended consequences raises the question of the uncontrolled development of self-replicating nanoscale machines. A number of very serious technical challenges would have to be overcome before it would be possible to create nanoscale machines that could reproduce themselves in the natural environment. Some of these challenges appear to be insurmountable with respect to chemistry and physical principles, and it may be technically impossible to create self-reproducing mechanical nanoscale robots of the sort that some visionaries have imagined.’ National Science Foundation: Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology

Predictive programming (being shown to UK school children now) – Instructional manual for population management in the Globalist run dystopia titled ‘Your Guide to the Future of Sustainable Urban Mobility in 2040': “Planned-opolis” Mega-cities, “calorie cards/rations”, “smart” phones, “Global Food Council in control of food supplies/rations water”, “career announcements”, “Mega computer in charge…Switch off brain and go to work…Cry Freedom ghettos.”…

“What’s on the menu this month? No, not meat. It’s not your birthday! The Global Food Council are doing a really good job of keeping food production going. I mean, you don’t get the choice you used to, but we’re better off than most. You barely see a car in the city center nowadays. unless you’re rich. The State knows they just aren’t practical anymore. and we’re all trying to meet our global carbon deal…I miss my sister like mad. but I’m glad they went when they moved to New Amsterdam. They’re safe from “Climate Change” on the floating city…It’s much easier to meet up with friends virtually now. So many cities have banned cars in central areas.”

Social Engineering model for managing society – Some Principles of Mass Persuasion: ‘Behavior is determined by the belief, opinions & ‘facts’ a person possesses; by the needs, goals & values he has; and by the momentary control held over his behavior by given features of his cognitive and motivational structures. To influence behavior ‘from the outside’ requires the ability to influence these determinants in a particular way.’ Tavistock Institute

“Predictive programming works by means of the propagation of the illusion of an infallibly accurate vision of how the world is going to look in the future” J.H. Towsen, author of ‘Clowns’

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. …In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.” Edward Bernays essay ‘Propaganda‘

Alan Watt – Predictive Programming Theory and Practice

Royal Society – Globalist think tank head of operations

“The greatest evil is not done in those sordid dens of evil that Dickens loved to paint but is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clear, carpeted, warmed, well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices.” C. S. Lewis

“The safest road to hell is the gradual one-the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts.” C. S. Lewis

Related Articles:

VRM: The Autism Report

VRM Worldwide Autism Study

VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 1

VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 2 – Synergistic Effect of Heavy Metal Toxicity On The Body

VRM: Vaccine Clinic – A Concise Compendium To The Problem With Vaccines

VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 3 – Synthetic Genomics & The Death Of Natural Immunity

VRM: A Concise Compendium To The Problem With Vaccines Part 3 – Synthetic Genomics & The Death Of Natural Immunity

VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 4 – Primary Aspects of Vaccine Toxicity Affecting Body

VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 5A – Detoxification & Restoration of the Body

VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 5B – Detoxification & Restoration of the Body

VRM: Vaccine Ingredients

VRM: Family Charts Gradual Decline Of Daughter

VRM: Autism – Steps To Take Toward Prevention

VRM: Health Matters Part 1

VRM: Health Matters Part 2

VRM: Alternative Cancer Cures That Work

VRM: Pregnancy Tips

VRM: The Vanishing Sperm Count

VRM: Media Spin & Swine Flu Hysteria

VRM: H1N1 Vaccine Surplus From 2009 Reveals Growing Distrust of Gov’t & WHO – Cost To Taxpayers Exceeds 2.5 Billion

VRM: Flu Death Statistics – WHO & The Big Lie

VRM: Canada’s 2010-11 Flu Vaccine A Deadly Concoction

VRM: United States 2010-11 Flu Vaccine Afluria – Buyer Beware

VRM: Australian Vaccine Scandal

VRM: Polio – United Nations & The Great Cull

VRM : Vaccine Industry Deception, Propaganda & Media Collusion

VRM: Birth of Medical & Scientific Dictatorship – Future Scenarios

VRM: H1N1 Bio-weaponry Incorporated

VRM : Aids & The WHO Connection – Criminal Intent

VRM: Morgellons Syndrome & Chemtrails

VRM : Council On Foreign Relations 10/16/09- Major Influence on Government Vaccine Policy

VRM: Closed Door CDC Meeting Reveals Industry Cover-up Of Heavy Metal Toxicity In Vaccines

VRM : World Health Organization & Vaccine Manufacturers Implicated In Massive H1N1 Financial Scam Involving Kickbacks & Cover-ups

VRM : Former Pharmaceutical Representative Gwen Olsen Exposes Systemic Industry Fraud

VRM: Britain’s National Health Service – Criminal Syndicate Swindling Billions While Rapidly Destroying Health Care System

VRM: UK Institutes Brand of Medical Martial Law With ‘Super-Vaccination’ Day

VRM : The Awakening Has Begun

VRM: Medical Martial Law In The US – Sleeping Giant Of Tyranny

VRM : Multi-Virus Vaccine Quinvaxem Proving Deadly

VRM: New Generation Cancer Vaccine Will Cause Infertility

VRM: CDC-Gate Exposes A Trail of Fraud Behind Autism Studies

VRM : Squaline – The Military Agenda Comes Home

VRM Live – 01/28/11: Vaccine Resistance Movement founder Joel Lord discusses Synthetic Genomics, cloned cell vaccine technology & the death of natural immunity, gutter journalism & Dr. Wakefield’s imminent vindication with ‘Truth to Power’ host Paul Mabelis.

VRM Live – 11/04/10: Vaccine Resistance Movement founder Joel Lord lays out the whole vaccine process with Paul Mabelis; including heavy metal toxicity, synergy, pregnancy issues & the basic principles of natural health at risk.

VRM Live – 09/24/10: Vaccine Resistance Movement Founder Joel Lord & activist/radio host Jesse Calhoun lay it all out tonite. Topics include the VRM Worldwide Autism Study, Scientific/Medical dictatorship, Natural Rights & Vaccine Industry fraud exposed. Special thanks to host Paul Mabelis.


18 Responses to “VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario”

    VRM: SB277 Road To Tyranny « Vaccine Resistance Movement on August 16, 2016

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: Mycoplasma – Rogue Pathogen in Vaccines « Vaccine Resistance Movement on April 26, 2016

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: Genetic Engineering & The Next Pandemic « Vaccine Resistance Movement on February 2, 2016

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: The Autism Report Part 2 – Missing Link « Vaccine Resistance Movement on October 4, 2015

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: Ebola Report « Vaccine Resistance Movement on September 17, 2015

    […] and mutating throughout the population of Sub-Saharan Africa – manifesting in the coveted Virus-Bacterial hybrid the Rockefellers have sought for […]
    VRM: The Rise of Mutagenic Viruses « Vaccine Resistance Movement on January 29, 2015

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: The Re-emergence of Polio in The Third World (compliments of the World Health Organization & Bill Gates) « Vaccine Resistance Movement on September 29, 2013

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: 5 Reasons Not To Get The Flu Shot « Vaccine Resistance Movement on September 2, 2013

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: The Confidenti?al Case-files of GlaxoSmith?Kline – Cover-up, Deferral & Denial of Responsibi?lity for Vaccine-re?lated Premature Deaths « Vaccine Resistance Movement on April 7, 2013

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 4 – Primary Aspects of Vaccine Toxicity Affecting The Body « Vaccine Resistance Movement on January 27, 2013

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: Medical Industry Studies Prove Influenza Vaccine Is Both Dangerous & Ineffective « Vaccine Resistance Movement on December 1, 2012

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: Weaponized Polio & The African Green Monkey Conundrum « Vaccine Resistance Movement on September 20, 2012

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    Natural News Bombshell: 2 Merck Insiders (Virologist Expert Scientists!) Say MERCK has been faking vaccine data for over a decade, spiking test samples with animal antibodies, and selling vaccines that cause the infection they are supposed to prevent. Doc on June 29, 2012

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: World Health Organization Mafia – Lies, Flies & Conflicts of Interest « Vaccine Resistance Movement on June 13, 2012

    […] See: VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    Billions Spent On A Cure For Cancer And Yet Cancer Rates Continue To Explode? » Musicians for Freedom on September 22, 2011

    […] out Rick Perry’s “mistake” concerning Gardasil. Also, check out this overview of eugenics. The American Dream Why hasn’t a cure for cancer been found?  We have poured billions upon […]
    Alternative Cancer Cures That Work & Your Government Still Can’t Ban them From Use! « nextlevelnutritiondotcom on March 11, 2011

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]
    VRM: Multi-Virus Vaccine Quinvaxem Proving Deadly « Vaccine Resistance Movement on February 18, 2011

    […] Worldwide Autism Study « VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario VRM: United States 2010-11 Flu Vaccine Afluria – Buyer Beware […]
    VRM: Birth of Medical & Scientific Dictatorship – Future Scenarios « Vaccine Resistance Movement on September 23, 2010

    […] VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario […]



Billions Spent On A Cure For Cancer And Yet Cancer Rates Continue To Explode?


VRM: Birth of Medical & Scientific Dictatorship – Future Scenarios


VRM: Mycoplasma – Rogue Pathogen in Vaccines

Looking Back at David Rockefeller’s Key Role in Building the ‘Deep State’

The newly deceased plutocrat was a capitalist cold warrior with CIA ties who helped craft U.S. foreign policy.

David Rockefeller was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, and he died on March 20, at the age of 101, with a gold one.

A grandson of robber baron John D. Rockefeller, David grew up in a family mansion in midtown Manhattan that was the tallest private home ever built in New York City. He went on to become chairman and CEO of Chase Manhattan Bank, and one of the most influential plutocrats in the United States — with the help of an enormous inherited fortune. Just a few months before his death, David Rockefeller's net worth was estimated at a staggering $3.3 billion.

Over a span of more than five decades, every U.S. president since Dwight Eisenhower met with Rockefeller to seek his advice and support. Richard Nixon twice asked him to be his secretary of the treasury.

It is well known that Rockefeller frequented Republican circles and was a major donor to GOP causes. Less known is the pivotal role he played in formulating U.S. foreign policy and the long-standing ties he had to the Central Intelligence Agency and what has now become a hot topic of discussion: the deep state.

A committed capitalist cold warrior from the start, Rockefeller deftly navigated the worlds of corporate America, the U.S. government and the foreign policy establishment — sometimes all at once. Not only was he one of neoliberalism's greatest champions, he helped lead and create powerful organizations that greatly undermined the global left and maintained U.S. hegemony.

The Council on Foreign Relations and U.S. Foreign Policy

David Rockefeller's heavy hand was visible in one of the most prominent U.S. foreign policy institutions: the Council on Foreign Relations. The influential think tank, which was founded in 1921, established itself as a key vehicle for Cold War capitalist politics. Rockefeller sat on the organization's board of directors, and later served as its chairman.

Since the end of the Cold War and the destruction of large-scale socialist movements, the Council on Foreign Relations has remained a prominent proselytizer for right-wing, pro-corporate policies around the planet. As part of this profit-making process, it dutifully justifies and sells Western wars and military intervention.

The Council on Foreign Relations' board is a Who's Who of eminent militarists and capitalists. Joining Rockefeller on the body have been by a slew of corporate elites from Coca-Cola, Goldman Sachs, Kraft, Barclays Capital, the Gates Foundation and beyond.

While advising U.S. presidents, David Rockefeller prioritized several topics of concern. One such subject was Iran, an oil-rich nation where the CIA backed a coup in 1953, toppling the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddegh at the bequest of international oil corporations.

Before Iran's 1979 revolution, Rockefeller was a staunch supporter of the U.S.-backed shah, and helped influence policy on the matter. In his book on U.S. statesman John J. McCloy, journalist Kai Bird noted that Joseph V. Reed, Rockefeller's personal assistant at Chase Manhattan, referred to Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger and McCloy as the "Triumpherate."

Like Rockefeller, McCloy passed in and out of the government-corporate-think tank revolving door. McCloy had extensive ties to the Rockefellers and, like the billionaire family, Kissinger, and his foreign policy peers, was a belligerent anti-communist who believed in the use of military violence in the name of containment.

McCloy served as chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, where he and Rockefeller became very close. McCloy also chaired the Ford Foundation and sat as a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation multiple times. Moreover, like Rockfeller, McCloy chaired the Council on Foreign Relations.

Right-wing conspiracy theorists fixate on figures like Rockefeller and McCloy, as well as organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group, characterizing them as "globalists" in a putative conspiracy to create a "one-world government." The truth is just the opposite. Rockefeller and other billionaire plutocrats have played a key role helping Western capitalist governments and large financial institutions crush socialist and other revolutionary movements throughout the world on behalf of fellow billionaires, multinational corporations and their bottom lines. The so-called "New World Order" they supposedly want to establish already exists; by and large, it is one of unchallenged corporate power, in which eight capitalists control half of global wealth, while billions of impoverished workers toil on the brink of death.

The CIA and Chile

A case study of just how plutocrats like Rockefeller and the U.S. government worked together to crush international socialist movements can be seen in Chile and the CIA-backed coup in that country.

In his college days, Rockefeller befriended the CIA's Dulles brothers and rubbed elbows with prominent CIA apparatchiks like Richard Helms, William Bundy and Archibald Bulloch Roosevelt Jr.

Former U.S. Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger was likewise a pal of David Rockefeller. Kissinger previously served as the director of the Special Studies Project for the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

In 1970, when the Chilean people elected marxist Salvador Allende, Chase Manhattan Bank was furious, as was the U.S. government. "I don't see why we have to let a country go marxist just because its people are irresponsible," Kissinger declared.

David Rockefeller repeatedly corresponded with Kissinger before a CIA-backed coup toppled Allende on Sept. 11, 1973 — the "first 9/11," as Chileans know it.

"The very name of Allende was anathema to the extreme right in Chile, to certain powerful corporations (notably ITT, Pepsi Cola and the Chase Manhattan Bank) which did business in Chile and the United States, and to the CIA," journalist Christopher Hitchens wrote in his book The Trial of Henry Kissinger.

Top U.S. officials held a series of meetings within two weeks of Allende's election, to plan ways to undermine his socialist government. Rockefeller and Donald Kendall, the CEO of Pepsi Cola, who had close ties to President Richard Nixon, both discussed Chile with Kissinger, Hitchens noted, citing declassified documents. CIA director Richard Helms, Kissinger and Nixon agreed that Chile's democratically elected leader must be stopped. Notes from their meeting read: "Not concerned risks involved. No involvement of embassy. $10,000,000 available, more if necessary. Full-time job — best men we have… Make the economy scream. 48 hours for plan of action."

Kissinger and Rockefeller stayed in touch on the issue. A declassified memo to Kissinger details his correspondence with the billionaire banker.

One of Allende's earliest actions was to nationalize mines exploited by the Anaconda Copper Mining Company, which owed hundreds of millions of dollars to Chase Manhattan and other U.S. banks.

On August 10, 1971, Rockefeller wrote a letter to Kissinger noting that John Place, the former vice chairman of Chase Manhattan bank, had recently left to become president and CEO of the Anaconda Company. Chile's government had nationalized the company and was not paying up, Place complained.

Rockefeller requested that Kissinger organize a meeting in Washington with Place. A week later, the meeting was held in Kissinger's office. He was joined by Place, William Quigley, the vice chairman of the board of the Anaconda Company, and Arnold Nachmanoff of the National Security Council. A memo from the meeting shows that "Mr. Place and Mr. Quigley expressed concern over the deteriorating situation in Chile." Quigley called on the U.S. to send an envoy to Chile to threaten the government "that if they do not reach fair settlements [with U.S. corporations], we will make every effort to cut off their access to international credit."

Kissinger "noted that this was a very difficult problem: we cannot buy Allende off," the memo said. He affirmed that "there is still a chance that Allende might be overthrown," and emphasized "that he favored a tough line." The memo added, "Mr. Place and Mr. Quigley reiterated their approval of a tough line."

On September 2, Kissinger sent a letter to Rockefeller, thanking him for his original missive and notifying him of the August 17 meeting with the Anaconda Company executives. "We will do whatever we can to help Anaconda receive fair compensation for its properties," Kissinger wrote.

In 1973, Allende was toppled and killed in a CIA-backed coup. His democratically elected socialist government was replaced with a U.S.-backed capitalist dictatorship under Augusto Pinochet. The Anaconda Company was paid hundreds of millions of dollars and tens of thousands of Chilean leftists were murdered, tortured and disappeared.

The Trilateral Commission and Neoliberal Trade Policies

In addition to his work leading the Council on Foreign Relations, David Rockefeller created other institutions that pushed for capitalist domination and neoliberal, pro-corporate policies.

The Americas Society and Council of the Americas published a statement expressing "their deepest sadness over the death of" the billionaire. Rockefeller had founded and served as honorary chairman of the Council of the Americas, a corporate-backed organization that advocated for so-called free trade policies in North and South America.

Rockefeller wrote in his memoir that, at the organization's Forum of the Americas in Washington, D.C. in 1992, "I proposed creating a 'Western Hemisphere free trade area' no later than the year 2000." President George W. Bush delivered the event's keynote address, but it was President Bill Clinton who helped fulfill the billionaire's dream. In 1994, the Clinton administration passed the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, which destroyed local economies in Mexico and led to massive outsourcing, harming workers across the continent.

The International Executive Service Corps, another organization co-created by Rockefeller, with government funding and ties to large corporations, was a Cold War capitalist project that continues to encourage private ownership and corporate partnerships as a solution to poverty, inequality and other systemic problems.

Scholar Noam Chomsky observed in 1981 that one of the most striking features of the Jimmy Carter administration was the large role played by the Trilateral Commission, a group of anti-communist, liberal capitalists from the U.S., Europe and Japan that Rockefeller assembled in 1973. "All of the top positions in the government — the office of President, Vice-President, Secretary of State, Defense and Treasury — are held by members of the Trilateral Commission, and the National Security Advisor was its director," Chomsky wrote.

One of the body's functions, he noted, was to ensure continued U.S. hegemony over the Global South. The Trilateral Commission's most infamous work, nonetheless, was a book-length report titled The Crisis of Democracy. In the document, Chomsky highlighted, the commission insisted countries need "a greater degree of moderation in democracy" to deal with the problem of an "excess of democracy."

The Trilateral Commission, which was created with the help of the Chase Manhattan Bank billionaire, lamented that, in the U.S., "previously passive or unorganized groups in the population" like "blacks, Indians, Chicanos, white ethnic groups, students and women" had become "organized and mobilized in new ways to achieve what they considered to be their appropriate share of the action and of the rewards." This destabilized the political order, which "usually requires some measure of apathy and noninvolvement on the part of some individuals and groups," the report claimed.

"Truman had been able to govern the country with the cooperation of a relatively small number of Wall Street lawyers and bankers," the report observed. "By the mid-1960s, the sources of power in society had diversified tremendously, and this was no longer possible." Something had to be done about this; corporate elites were losing their grip on society.

Just a few years later, Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Regan would usher in neoliberalism, a new wave of even less restrained capitalism which Rockefeller and his billionaire friends would ride to the bank.

David Rockefeller enjoyed a long career as a key figure in the U.S. ruling class, and an even longer life. He was a billionaire plutocrat who used his enormous inherited wealth and influence to crush any threat to Western capitalist interests. And he was very successful in that mission.


David Rockefeller’s Rolodex Was the Stuff of Legend. Here’s a First Peek.
Bank executive met with nearly every world leader for 50 years, filled out some 200,000 note cards


David Rockefeller confronted in Chile, You are not welcome here ! Guy Shout Scream


Alex Jones Interviews 17YO Chilean Who Confronted David Rockefeller

Nelson Rockefeller


Rockefeller family tried and failed to get ExxonMobil to accept climate change

Founding family of the US oil empire Exxon, begged the company to give up climate denial and reform their ways a decade ago – but attempts at engagement failed


The Rockefeller Brothers Fund Is Bankrolling Israel’s Destruction


You’ve Heard of John D. Rockefeller, But You’ll Never Guess Where His Father is Buried – History of The Family


The Biggest Surprises From the $833 Million Rockefeller Sale


Rothschild and Rockefeller: their family fortunes

As a Rothschild trust prepares to buy a stake in the Rockefeller empire, how have these two dynasties managed to hold on to their wealth for so long?


THE ROCKEFELLERS: How A Few Poor Germans Became An Immortal American Dynasty

The Rockefellers most likely immigrated from Germany to the U.S. in the 1720s.

 The original name was said to be "Rockenfeller" — and indeed there are numerous Rockenfellers who turn up in a Google search of that name with their purported home city of Neuwied.

Source: New York Times

The end of the Civil War coincided with the country's first oil boom.

Cleveland was also becoming a major logistics hub. JD was not exactly wedded to selling fruits and vegetables, and in 1865 he cashed out of the produce partnership to invest in an oil refinery.
Source: Hubbard


What Happened When General Grant Expelled Civil War Jews

The shocking story of when General Grant expelled Jews during the Civil War based on their religion—and how he made up for it.

In 1862, in the midst of the Civil War, General Ulysses S. Grant ordered every Jew in his military district covering a large section of the central Southern states to leave within 24 hours. He was trying with little success to control the enormously profitable and illegal trade in contraband cotton—much of it being carried out by his own officers—and took out his frustration on the Jews. Man, woman and child, many if not most Union loyalists, few if any involved in the cotton trade, faced a stark choice of packing whatever they could carry and heading off for distant and often unknown parts or military confinement. Many people lost everything they owned as they were driven, in some cases at bayonet point, from their homes.

But families were, as the United Order Bnai B’rith Missouri Lodge protested, “driven from their homes, deprived of their liberty, and injured in their property without having violated any law or regulation. . . .” Among the worst actions, soldiers pushed the entire Jewish population out of Paducah, Kentucky, at least 30 households, and left their properties to be ransacked after they left.
For Jews who had fled centuries of persecution in the Old World, the New held the promise of freedom from governmental and military attack. And here it was once again.
For the first time, however, American Jews acted in a unified political manner to protest their treatment. President Abraham Lincoln received representatives of the people of Paducah in the White House. Likely apocryphal, a widely reported conversation between President Lincoln and the leader of the Paducah group linked Jews to ancient Israel and America to the Promised Land. Lincoln supposedly said, “And so the children of Israel were driven from the happy land of Canaan?”
To which the Paducah representative replied, “Yes, and that is why we have come unto Father Abraham’s bosom, asking protection.” And the President said, “And this protection they shall have at once.” The order was forthwith rescinded.
Grant quickly regretted General Order No. 11. After his election as president in 1868, he bent over backwards to demonstrate that it was an aberrant and thoughtless act done, he claimed, “without any reflection and without thinking of the Jews as a sect or race.” He emphasized, “I have no prejudice against sect or race, but want each individual to be judged by his own merit.
In fact, his presidency inaugurated what Sarna refers to as a golden age for Jews in the country. Grant appointed more Jews to public office than any previous president. No other president until well into the 20th century so firmly urged clarity in keeping church and state apart nor made such efforts to promote freedom of religious expression and the embrace of non-Protestants and non-natives as fully American.
Perhaps influenced by remorse over his General Order No. 11, his views extended to foreign affairs. The United States had long kept its hands off other nation’s internal affairs. As a slaveholding land, America did not have a leg to stand on when it came to intervening in human rights elsewhere. But now, Grant for the first time chose to take an active stance regarding another nation’s oppression of its citizens, in this case government attacks on Jews in Romania. He appointed a Jewish American as consul to Bucharest “for the benefit of the people who are laboring under severe oppression.” In making the controversial appointment, he wrote that a nation that defends the freedom of all its citizens without regard to their religion or birth “naturally believe[s] in a civilization the world over which will secure the same universal liberal views.”
Grant also advocated a failed constitutional amendment requiring states to offer free public education for all children and barring those schools from teaching any “religious, atheistic, or pagan tenets” and prohibiting the use of school funds “for the benefit…of any religious sect or denomination.” So popular did Grant become among Jews that he was invited and became the first American president to attend Jewish worship services, at the dedication of a new Washington, D.C., synagogue. Sarna writes, ‘Now, the man who had once expelled ‘Jews as a class’ from his war zone personally came to honor Jews for upholding and renewing their faith.”
America has been fighting this ideological war over freedom of religion and freedom from an established state religion since the Pilgrims fled here to escape the strictures on their lives and religious practices imposed by the Church of England. Sarna’s brilliantly nuanced exploration of the worst official anti-Semitic incident in American history offers us a clear reminder in these ideologically fraught days why keeping up a firm wall between church and state remains a core defense for all of our freedoms.


{Maybe if the Confederate Army won the Revolution, maybe we could have gotten all the Jewish Rothschilds and Rockefellers out of New York and America. Some will say that 
different groups funded both sides of the Revolution}.


Is the Rockefeller Foundation Jewish? You decide.

A look at the list of Rockefeller Foundation board chairman shows that for much of the past few decades there has been a Jewish chairman. The Rockefeller Foundation board as of January 2017 only has two or three Jews serving on it (depending on John Rowe’s pedigree), but more remarkably has at the most one non-Jewish white on it. What is most remarkable is of the 12 members, five are black, including three from Africans. There are also 2 Asian Indians, a Hispanic, and a Chinese person. There are no Rockefellers on the board, by the way.

Only two Jews out of twelve members. Disproportionate to be sure, but not enough to pass the Tree of Logic test. It’s kind of strange about all those blacks on the board, though. Let’s dig just a bit deeper. For 21 of the past 30 years the Foundation has had a Jewish president:

    Judith Rodin (retiring) – 2005-2017; former president of the University of Pennsylvania, and provost, chair of the Department of Psychology, Yale University.
    Peter Goldmark, Jr. – 1988-1997; former executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

A glance at the list of past board members reveals a number of high-profile Jews:

    Orvil E. Dryfoos 1960–1963 – Publisher of the New York Times, 1961-1963.
    Stephen Jay Gould 1993–2002 – Author; Professor and Curator, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University.
    Jessica T. Mathews, President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C.
    Julius Rosenwald 1917–1931 – Chairman of Sears Roebuck, 1932-1939.
    Arthur Hays Sulzberger 1939–1957 – Publisher of the New York Times, 1935-1961.
    James Wolfensohn – former President of the World Bank.

So there you have it. A massive fortune built up by a white man (whether you like it or not) that has been under the control of a Jewish president for 21 of the past 30 years operating with a board almost totally devoid of whites. This is really the template for what Jews are trying to do with our society: take the leadership role with the backing of various minorities while completely marginalizing whites.

It is not within the scope of this article to go deep into the actual workings of the Rockefeller Foundation. It has been a major contributor to Jewish power centers like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Brookings Institution, and the World Bank, along with massive grants to the Ivy League yeshivas. Of course, much of there “good work” preceded the tenures of the Jewish presidents, including the establishment of departments of psychology at major universities, which is what my caller was drawing attention to.

The take away is that Jews have been very successful at gaining control of institutions and resources built up by white gentiles and they using them for their own purposes, including marginalizing white gentiles.


Jew Watch

The Rockefeller Liberal Connection

In many ways, the Rockefeller Family works step-by-step with the Jewish Zionist and Soviet conspiracies. John D. Rockefeller was a monopolist who followed in the way of many Jews whose control of industries, especially banking, demonstrated the manner in which power, once achieved, might be forever wielded "from the top," high above the citizens of the world's nations.

Although the Rockefellers claim to be Christian Protestants, their activities are so similar to those of their Jewish brethren that there seems to be little mistake that they then to follow the leader. Perhaps this is because their mentors in monopolizing the oil industry and the many conglomerates which they control have lead them into the deepest realms of the grand conspiracy to control the nations of the world through leftist political approaches, one world orders, and Soviet type top/down planning.

The Rockefeller fortune is so large that it literally eclipses the income of entire nations where Rockefeller Oil is pumped, countries like each and every African nation, the Southeast Asian countries, and small nations in the Southern Hemisphere of The Americas. Its operations are streamlined top/down and down/up/decide/down, a manner typical of communist regimes.

The Rockefeller's job as conspirators seems to be penetration and compromise of the Republican Party. The Rockefellers are representative of the Left Wing/Liberal/Soviet side of Republicanism. Some think that the Rockefellers are a part of the internationalist conspiracy, because their holdings are international, and a war would disrupt their revenue streams significantly and might threaten all of them. Peace by any means is the method used by internationalists to maintain their power and wealth.


Bilderberg Group - A Jewish Who’s Who!

SECRECY ENSHROUDS THE JEWISH-RUN Bilderberg Group. (See Their Secret Operation In Chantilly VA Here & Here).

One of the Bilderberg’s deceptions is to invite insignificant leaders in the academic & scientific realms as a “decoy.”

For instance, in the current Bilderberg Meeting taking place June 5-8 2008 at the Westfields Marriott Hotel in Chantilly VA, attendees such as Fouad Ajami, Director of Middle East Studies at John Hopkins University, & Martha Farrah, Director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at University of Pennsylvania, serve as “window dressing.”

Here Are The Real Players Attending & They Are Jewish Bankers:
Full List Here

 Ben Shalom Bernanke: Chairman of the privately held US Federal Reserve Bank.

  James Wolfensohn: International Jewish financier. Chairman of Wolfensohn & Company Investments. A former World Bank President, this Jew has more than 140 employees and offices in London, Tokyo and Moscow. Wolfensohn also has a banking partnership with Fuji Bank of Japan and Jacob Rothschild of Britain.

Robert Zoellick: Chairman of the US World Bank Group a covert subsidiary of the Rothschild run International Monetary Fund.

 Josef Ackermann: Chairman of the Executive Committee of Deutsche Bank AG of Zurich Switzerland. Ackermann is a Rothschild partner in white collar crime.

Kenneth Jacobs: Deputy Chairman Head of Lazard Bank North America. Lazard Bank, a Rothschild associate bank, operates in 39 cities throughout North America, Europe, Australia, Asia, and South America.

David Rockefeller: Owner of Chase Manhattan Bank. Former Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations & Founder of the Trilateral Commission. Though not a Jew, Rockefeller is a Rothschild stooge.


The Rockefeller Brothers Fund and BDS

How a storied philanthropy came to lend its legitimacy—and money—to groups that push boycotting Israel


{The Rockefellers fund both sides of the war}.


David Rockefeller


Rockefeller conspiracy theories


    1 Family
    2 Conspiracies
        2.1 World government
        2.2 Banking
        2.3 Alternative medicine
        2.4 World Trade Center
        2.5 Business practices
        2.6 Zika
    3 References


PM150629: Sonia Sotomayor is Jewish too - Henry Makow.


Where Judaism and Rockefellerism Join: Meet the Rockefeller-Growalds

NEW YORK, April 13 (JTA)–Wearing a plain navy suit and loafers, radiating a ruddy, unmade-up glow and enunciating each word with formality, she seems every bit a Rockefeller–with a twist.

“We do do Shabbat on Fridays,” Eileen Rockefeller Growald says. “We do do shehechianus after the first tomatoes of the season,” she adds, referring to the Jewish blessing over something new.

The daughter of David Rockefeller long has rejected the strictures of religion. But in her marriage to Paul Growald, she has “expanded to Judaism,” as she likes to say.

“I feel very blessed to have married Paul, and in a sense to have married into the richness of this culture,” she told several members of Jewish family foundations who gathered recently in Baltimore for the annual conference of the Jewish Funders Network.

In one of their first public talks about their marriage, the couple imparted some of the intergenerational customs of America’s most philanthropic families. They also discussed how they teach the values of philanthropy and responsibility to their children.

In an interview with JTA, the couple also shared their thoughts on a marriage that blends two distinct backgrounds.

Growald, 57, and Rockefeller Growald, 53, met in 1980 through a mutual interest in environmental conservation, and they have drawn on respect for the environment in raising their two boys–one a high school junior and another a freshman at Princeton University.

In their Vermont home, where they grow their own vegetables, they once spent two weeks living as if it were the 1840s. After one son carved out the yoke of a log to carry butter, he found softer wood in the log’s center.

“I realize the deeper you go, the more heart you will find,” the son told his mother, who realized that the lesson in hard work had paid off.

In raising her children, Rockefeller Growald tried to soften her family’s saying, engraved in New York City’s Rockefeller Center: “Every opportunity an obligation, every right a responsibility, every passion a duty.”

Yet she passed on her family’s philosophy of dividing your income in equal thirds, saving one, spending one and giving one away.

The effort to fend off a sense of entitlement seems to have worked. Their college son once told them that he was the only one of his college friends who paid his own phone bill, his parents said.

The extended Rockefeller family, which numbers about 125 people, meets twice a year, and they have strategies for connecting the generations.

One such approach is intergenerational dialogue, when a family member may express him or herself without fear of judgement. Another ritual, called passages, allows one family member to introduce another who has experienced a significant event, like a birthday.

In their immediate family, the Growalds have drawn on Jewish rituals.

“I’ve really loved the ritual of Friday night Shabbat with our boys,” Growald Rockefeller says.

“We haven’t done havdalah as consistently,” she adds, but when they do, they borrow a tradition of Growald’s brother, dousing the candle in a dish of vodka and setting the liquor on fire.

The family turns off the lights to watch the flame “dance in the dark,” Rockefeller Growald says.

The family members then race to say “Bye bye Shabbat” first.

“It’s playful, and I like closure,” Rockefeller Growald says. “It puts a very nice sense of closure to the Sabbath.”

The couple believes faith has been critical for sustaining their marriage.

“Religion as a spiritual value in raising our children was a binding force in our marriage, and it continues to be,” Rockefeller Growald says.

The family belongs to Ohavi Zedek Synagogue, the oldest and largest shul in Vermont.

Its rabbi, Joshua Chasan, who was ordained by the Jewish Theological Seminary, says the family has belonged to the shul for about 10 years. Growald is on the synagogue’s board.

“They’ve had two children in our religious school, and two wonderful Bar Mitzvahs,” Chasan says. “Both kids are real mensches.”

Growald’s background wasn’t like his wife’s: His parents escaped Germany in 1934 and eventually settled in Kalamazoo, Mich.

“I grew up in a place where there were very few Jews,” Growald says. One of the first questions he was commonly asked as a boy was which church he attended.

“I at times referred to the Jewish church,” he adds.

One part Rockefeller and one part Jew, the couple understands the feeling of being prejudged.

“We shared that value, that experience of being different,” Rockefeller Growald says.

Each family seemed to accept the couple.

Rockefeller Growald says she was raised believing that spirituality was found in nature. Her father cared only that her husband believed in God.

“My mother said, ‘You’ll never be a Jew,’ ” Rockefeller Growald says, which she took to mean that she would resist organized religion as her mother did.

The only concern for Growald’s parents was the idea that the Rockefeller influence would lead to spoiled grandchildren.

“That fear was allayed when they saw how we were bringing them up,” Growald says.

The couple continues the Rockefeller tradition of charity.

“Making a contribution to the world is ultimately the most satisfying way to live one’s life. It’s not making or spending money or gaining power,” Growald says.

Growald is on the board of the Rockefeller Family Fund, which doesn’t donate to religious causes.

Rockefeller Growald is the founding chair of the Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisers, which advises philanthropies throughout the world.

Asked if her Jewish experience plays a role in her work, she says that she draws on the value of service, which “is common to both Judaism and Rockefellerism.”


Were J.P. Morgan and John D. Rockefeller Jewish?


The Rothschilds and the weather: What you need to know about the anti-Semitic conspiracies about the banking family


The Rothschilds and Rockefellers Join Forces in Multi-Billion Dollar Deal

If you needed proof the world elite is a tightly-knit group geared on dynasties and bloodlines, well here’s a pretty good one. The most powerful family of Europe, the Rothschilds have joined forces with the most powerful family of America, the Rockefellers, in a super-multi-billion-dollar deal that greatly expands the influence of both families. For centuries, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers silently shaped the world as we know it, influencing political decisions, the economy and even wars between nations. As Mayer Amschel Rothschild stated: “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes her laws.”

Both families are now major actors in the creation a New World Order and this deal is a great example of how these ancient dynasties are merging into a single, world-dominating unit. As David Rockefeller stated in his memoirs:

    “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
    -David Rockefeller, “Memoirs of David Rockefeller” p.405

Here’s an article on the mega-deal between the two most powerful families on Earth.

    Transatlantic alliance between Rothschilds and Rockefellers for wealth management

    As if they weren’t already well-connected enough, the world’s two greatest dynasties joined forces yesterday as Europe’s Rothschild banking clan bought a stake in the Rockefeller group’s wealth and asset management business to gain a foothold in the US.

    The patriarchs of the two families – 96-year-old David Rockefeller and Jacob Rothschild, 76 – cemented a five-decade acquaintance as the younger man’s London-based £2bn RIT Capital investment trust bought a 37 per cent stake in the American’s business.

    In addition to bringing together the two doyens, the deal will considerably expand the vast networks of both families.

    To give a taste: Lord Rothschild’s son, Nat Rothschild, is a well-known entrepreneur with stakes in a range of companies such as Genel, the Kurdistan-focused oil producer run by former BP chief executive Tony Hayward and Bumi, the Indonesian mining group. He was also linked with George Osborne and Peter Mandelson at a notorious party on an oligarch’s yacht off Corfu in 2008.

    Lord Rothschild’s niece Kate is married to Ben Goldsmith, brother of Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith and Jemima Khan and son of the late billionaire business tycoon Sir James Goldsmith.

    On the Rockefeller side, for starters, David’s granddaughter Ariana is a successful fashion designer who married the construction heir Matthew Bucklin in 2010. And let’s not forget the founders who, although no longer with us, live on through their business creations.

    The Rockefeller family’s journey to vast riches began in 1870 when John D Rockefeller set up Standard Oil and went on establish a fortune that is widely regarded to be the largest in US history. The family’s wealth management operation was set up in 1882 to manage that fortune.

    The Rothschild dynasty goes back even further, to when Mayer Amschel Rothschild started a business in Frankfurt towards the end of the 18th century. It helped finance Britain’s war against Napoleon in the 19th century and raised funds for a loan allowing the British government to buy the Suez canal.

    The Rothschilds bought the stake in Rockefeller from French banking group Société Générale for an undisclosed sum. SocGen, which has owned the stake since 2008, appointed a new head of private banking in March, replacing Daniel Truchi with Jean-François Mazaud.

    SocGen’s sale of the stake comes as banks around the world sell peripheral assets to reduce their risks and strengthen their capital bases in order to meet tough regulations aimed at preventing a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis.

    Commenting on the deal, Mr Rockeller said: “Lord Rothschild and I have known each other for five decades. The connection between our two families remains very strong. I am delighted to welcome Jacob and RIT as shareholders.”

    – Source: The Independent

Here’s an article describing the long-standing ties between the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers.

    Rothschild and Rockefeller: their family fortunes

    As a Rothschild trust prepares to buy a stake in the Rockefeller empire, how have these two dynasties managed to hold on to their wealth for so long?

    You know you’ve really made it when your surname becomes an adjective.

    In the late 19th century, the term “Rothschild Tudor” came into use to describe the family’s half-timbered estate cottages, sprinkled across their vast landholdings in Buckinghamshire. And in America, for more than 80 years, Rockefeller has been shorthand for “very rich indeed”. The name crops up in two classic Thirties Broadway numbers: On the Sunny Side of the Street (“If I never had a cent, I’d be rich as Rockefeller”) and the Gershwins’ They All Laughed (“…at Rockefeller Centre – now they’re fighting to get in”).

    That’s why, for gilded dynasty watchers, the news of a union between these über-rich clans is so delicious: Lord Rothschild’s investment trust, RIT Capital Partners, is to buy a 37 per cent stake in Rockefeller Financial Services.

    The numbers involved are pretty mind-boggling. RIT has £1.9 billion in net assets; the Rockefeller company has £22 billion. As if that wasn’t enough, these companies are just minor fragments of the two family empires. RIT was only founded in 1961; the principal family bank, NM Rothschild & Sons, was set up in 1811, and is run by Lord Rothschild’s cousin, David de Rothschild.

    As we will see, there are a lot of Rothschild cousins, all of them pretty deep-pocketed, and plenty of them keen on starting new ventures. It’s symptomatic of the dynasty that Nat Rothschild, Lord Rothschild’s son, didn’t join the family bank when he left university but went to Lazard, before joining an investment management company, Atticus Capital, and then setting up a vast investment vehicle, Vallar plc.

    As for Rockefeller Financial Services, that was founded as early as 1882, when John D Rockefeller set up one of the first investment management businesses designed to run a single family’s money. So, as well as making a fortune from their principal company – Standard Oil – the Rockefellers have been making money from their money, as it were, for 130 years.

    That is what makes these two dynasties so exceptional – not just their dizzying wealth, but the fact that they have held on to it for so long: and not just the loot, but also their family companies. Other banking dynasties have fallen by the wayside – SG Warburg, founded by Siegmund Warburg in 1946, was swallowed up by Swiss Bank Corporation in 1995; its asset management side, Mercury Asset Management, was taken over by Merrill Lynch in 1997.

    Barings Bank, the oldest merchant bank in London, founded in 1762, collapsed in 1995, thanks to the disastrous £827 million punt taken by Nick Leeson. Lehman Brothers remained under family control until the death of Robert Lehman in 1969 – the bank’s collapse in 2008 was the spark that lit the greatest recession since the Thirties. And who now banks with the Medicis, the leading bankers in Europe in the Middle Ages, and the financial backers behind the Renaissance?

    It’s true that enormous fortunes – big enough to match 19th-century Rothschild and Rockefeller figures – have been made in recent years. Mark Zuckerberg is thought to be worth more than £12 billion since Facebook went public this month, though that figure seems to diminish a little with each Wall Street trading day. But, still, it’s unlikely that the name Zuckerberg will be associated with dynastic wealth for more than a century, as the Rothschild and Rockefeller names have been.

    Part of the reason is that dotcom fortunes, like Zuckerberg’s, can be founded within the four walls of a tiny Harvard dormitory. Great banking and oil ventures needed vast manpower, and vast representation across the world, to establish a foothold in the Victorian rich lists. Those deep foundations produce a lasting infrastructure, a lasting familial obligation to the business, and that lasting association in the popular mind between a particular surname and great wealth .

    Also, the Rockefeller and Rothschild families were consciously dynastic from the moment their businesses began. The founder of the Rothschild empire, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, was born in Frankfurt, Germany, the Jewish descendant of a 16th-century Rothschild, Izaak, who took his name from the sign outside his house – “Zum roten Schild” (“At the sign of the red shield”).

    It was Mayer Amschel who laid the foundations of today’s Rothschild power base, by sending his five sons off to different European financial hubs: Frankfurt, Vienna, Paris, Naples and London, where his third son, Nathan Mayer Rothschild, founded the eponymous bank in the City in 1811. Almost immediately, NM Rothschild became a major force in the City, bankrolling the Duke of Wellington during the Napoleonic Wars.

    John D Rockefeller got going a little later. The son of a travelling salesman, he made a fortune in food supply, before turning to oil refining in Ohio. By 1868, he owned the biggest oil refinery in the world, in partnership with his brother.

    Throughout Rockefeller history, the name has stamped itself deep into the popular psyche through its philanthropy. That first John D Rockefeller founded Chicago University and Rockefeller University, as well as the Rockefeller Foundation – backer of, inter alia, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and the New School in New York.

    It was his son, John D Rockefeller Junior, who built New York’s Rockefeller Centre. The Gershwins were quite right in their lyrics, Manhattan’s gazillionaires did fight to get into the soaring art deco skyscraper, and it became one of the city’s biggest pieces of prime real estate: 19 buildings across 22 acres, all in the very centre of New York, between 5th and 6th Avenues and 48th and 51st Streets.

    The cliché of fabulous new wealth is “rags to rags in three generations”, but each generation of the Rockefellers kept on building up the current account, while spreading the philanthropic interests. John D Rockefeller Junior gave the land for the Museum of Modern Art, stuffed the Met with medieval masonry and set up New York’s best-kept secret, the Cloisters museum, a staggering complex of five French monasteries perched on a cliff above the Hudson River.

    His five sons continued the dynastic pattern – and that dynastic importance was intensified with the use of Roman numerals: JD Junior’s son was dubbed John D Rockefeller III. His brother Nelson was Gerald Ford’s vice-president; another brother, Winthrop, was Republican Governor of Arkansas. And the youngest brother, David, is still with us, at 96, now the Rockefeller patriarch and still hurling dollar bills at charitable institutions. In 2005, he gave away £64 million to the Museum of Modern Art and Rockefeller University – each.

    A philanthropic streak runs through the Rothschilds, too. Jacob Rothschild’s home, Waddesdon, in Buckinghamshire – built in Rothschild Loire château style, rather than Rothschild Tudor – now belongs to the National Trust, but he continues to cram it with treasures appropriate to its Victorian builder, Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild. He also endowed the National Gallery generously during his time as chairman of its trustees, and did much to turn Somerset House from London’s biggest car park into its finest neo-classical palace.

    The new union between the two clans does more than weld two vast fortunes to each other, then. It allies a pair of dynasties that have – coincidentally, independently – followed the two rules that all mega-plutocrats must obey if they want to be remembered in a century’s time. One: ensure your children feel a duty to preserve the family fortune. And, two, paradoxical as it may sound: give as much money as you can to universities, galleries and hospitals.

    – Source: The Telegraph


Bush, Rockefeller, Rothschild & Hitler


Murder by Injection

Chapter 10

The Rockefeller Syndicate



 A book overlooked by most people and published for sale mainly within the Jewish community states that the Rockefellers are Jews of Sephardic descent (meaning Spanish and Portuguese Jews). The book is entitled "The Grandees - America's Sephardic Elite." The author is Stephen Birmingham, who is recognized by the Jewish community as an expert on Jewish history.

   The publisher of "The Grandees" is the Jewish owned publishing firm of "Harper and Row" of New York City. Mr. Birmingham also wrote the book "Our Crowd" about the family background of America's wealthiest and most successful Jews. Both books have been hailed by Jewish publications as first class works in the documentation of Jewish history.

   In "The Grandees" Stephen Birmingham reveals the existence of a very rare book which was published only for Jews some years ago. The work was published only for Jews some years ago. The work was compiled by the Jewish historian Malcolm H. Stern and entitled "Americans of Jewish Decent." That book weighed 10 pounds and gave the history of 25,000 Jewish individuals in America. It is extremely interesting to note that only 550 copies of the book were printed and each copy was consecutively numbered. The book was delivered to the top Jewish community leaders in America for their personal reference files in dealing with and contacting Jews who are "Marranos" (those Jews who "PRETEND" to be Christians in their community but secretly hold to their Jewish faith and race when among their own kind).

   Mr. Birmingham in "The Grandees" reports: "Who would expect to find the Rockefellers in the book." Stern's work traces what he calls the "Nobility of Jewry - the Sephardim who lived in Spain and Portugal as princes of the land." Many centuries ago the Jews flooded into Spain in great numbers and through usury and stealth became vast land owners. The Jews controlled both Spain and Portugal through their monopoly over the finances of the country.

   It was in 1492 that King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain expelled the Jews from their country and confiscated their ill-gotten wealth. It was during this period that the Rockefeller family moved to the Turkish Empire which welcomed the Jews at that time, believing them to be a "poor persecuted people."

   The grandfather of our former Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller, admitted that his family once moved from Turkey to France. It was from France that they moved to America. John D. Rockefeller, Sr., was a wealthy man even before he took over Standard Oil Co., which made their family one of the richest in the world. No one has ever explained how this family came into such wealth as soon as they arrived in America from France.

   There is no known information on how the Rockefellers came into huge amounts of money in France. Some thing they got their money from the Rothschilds and were originally their agents in buying up Christian businesses in America. "Marranos" are Jews who "PRETEND" to convert to Christianity so as to deceive Christians in their business dealings, but secretly continued to practice Judaism in private rituals. For this reason, a Marrano family like the Rockefellers would make the perfect tool for the Rothschilds of France who have for centuries used secret agents to carry on their work.

   "The Thunderbolt" was the first publication to bring Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller's Jewish ancestry to public attention. This information finally explains why he has always been able to work so closely with Jewish interests and why his administration as governor of New York was loaded down with Jews from top to bottom. His political campaigns of the past were always directed by Jews and he was always the support of the Jewish community in all of his political races.

   Normally the Jews would not support a Christian multi-millionaire for political office because they would be afraid they could not control him after the election. The fact that Jewish community leaders have long known that the Rockefellers were fellow Jews goes a long way in explaining why the organized Jewish community has always supported the Rockefeller's political ambitions. Now we can see why Nelson and David Rockefeller boosted his fellow Jew Henry Kissinger into the Nixon administration and Kissinger in turn has used his position to bring his fellow Jew Rockefeller into power.


Rome, Rockefeller, the U.S. and Standard Oil

The Monarchy of Money!!


A Brief History of the Rockefeller/Rothschild Empire


Rubenstein and Rockefeller


Are Rockefellers & Sotomayor Illuminati Jews?

from 29 July 2009
by Willie Martin

   A book overlooked by most people and published for sale mainly within the Jewish community states that the Rockefellers are Jews of Sephardic descent (meaning Spanish and Portuguese Jews). The work was compiled by the Jewish historian Malcolm H. Stern and entitled "Americans of Jewish Descent."  [A search confirms that this book indeed exists.]

That book weighed 10 pounds and gave the history of 25,000 Jewish individuals in America. It is extremely interesting to note that only 550 copies of the book were printed and each copy was consecutively numbered. The book was delivered to the top Jewish community leaders in America for their personal reference in dealing with and contacting Jews who are "Marranos" (those Jews who "PRETEND" to be Christians in their community but secretly hold to their Jewish "faith" and race when among their own kind.)

Stephen Birmingham in "The Grandees" reports: "Who would expect to find the Rockefellers in the book." Stern's work traces what he calls the "Nobility of Jewry - the Sephardim who lived in Spain and Portugal as princes of the land." Many centuries ago the Jews flooded into Spain in great numbers and through usury and stealth became vast land owners. The Jews controlled both Spain and Portugal through their monopoly over the finances of the country.

In 1492, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain expelled the Jews from their country and confiscated their ill-gotten wealth. It was during this period that the Rockefeller family moved to the Turkish Empire which welcomed the Jews at that time, believing them to be a "poor persecuted people."

The grandfather of our former Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller admitted that his family once moved from Turkey to France. It was from France that they moved to America. John D. Rockefeller, Sr., was a wealthy man even before he took over Standard Oil Co., which made their family one of the richest in the world. No one has ever explained how this family came into such wealth as soon as they arrived in America from France.

There is no known information on how the Rockefellers came into huge amounts of money in France. Some thing they got their money from the Rothschilds and were originally their agents in buying up Christian businesses in America. "Marranos" are Jews who "PRETEND" to convert to Christianity so as to deceive Christians in their business dealings, but secretly continued to practice Judaism in private rituals. For this reason, a Marrano family like the Rockefellers would make the perfect tool for the Rothschilds of France who have for centuries used secret agents to carry on their work.

(Left, Rockefeller Museum in Jerusalem)

"The Thunderbolt" was the first publication to bring Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller's Jewish ancestry to public attention. This information finally explains why he has always been able to work so closely with Jewish interests and why his administration as Governor of New York was loaded with Jews from top to bottom. His political campaigns of the past were always directed by Jews and he was always the support of the Jewish community.

Normally the Jews would not support a Christian multi-millionaire for political office because they would be afraid they could not control him after the election. The fact that Jewish community leaders have long known that the Rockefellers were fellow Jews goes explains why the organized Jewish community has always supported the Rockefellers. Now we can see why Nelson and David Rockefeller boosted his fellow Jew Henry Kissinger into the Nixon administration and Kissinger in turn has used his position to bring his fellow Jew, Rockefeller into power.

Identity Politics: Is Sotomayor a Latina or an Illuminati Jewess? --Reader asks

It appears that Sonia Sotomayor will be placed on the Supreme
Court. The girl who was brought up as a Catholic, but during her
her days at University belonged to the Latino organization and
all went to Sunday mass except her - Imao, sounds like an echo
in the room with the likes of Nancy Pelosi who is another yenta;
(speaks Yiddish fluently, but this Italian gal can't speak Italian.)
The Pope knew and he gave her a 15 minute interview with a
smile on his face.

Sonia's family originated in Spain during the late 1400's andvthen fled to Portugal; then on the Chile, Puerto Rico, and US
over hundreds of years. There is a very special website that gives the names of all Sephardic Jews in the world and one
only has to research: Soto, Mayor, Sotomayor, and her mom's maiden name of Baez; not to mention a simple look at photos
of her and the mother.

This is a satanic movement who is stacking people in all the important positions of power. This all reminds me of the good
Catholic boy called Hugh Hefner who finally came out of the closet a few years ago to admit he was really a [Sabbatean] Jew.

See also "Sotomayor and the Crypto Jew"

Another reader:

"Sottomayor are a powerful Banking Family in Portugal...
All Sottomayor's are in some way connected to the Banking Empire."

Makow comment: She is divorced with no children. She was a member of the women's only (lesbian?) "Belizean Club" patterned on the Illuminati (homosexual) Bohemian Grove.


Another Reader: Tisha Bav, an ancient Jewish holiday that is the most sacred Shabbetean festival, because it's also supposedly Zevi's birthday, coincides with Bohemian Grove.  And Shabbetean rituals on Tisha Bav are known to involves various sex rites, wife swapping and incest.  Antelman didn't think there was much to the coincidence, but if his claims are correct, then we should expect that the Illuminati to this day are comprised largely of Shabbeteans.  Which would suggest that the leading families are all or mostly crypto-Jews, as are the Rockefellers.  I would also suspect that the Bushes are.

(Puerto Rican girl, left)

You can find "Bush" listed in sites of Jewish names.  And Pike mentions in his Grand Constitutions that a Samuel Bush was a "Grand Elect, Perfect and Sublime Knight, blah, blah.."  Here's what I found:
"In the year 1761, a certain Stephen Morin was invested by the Grand Consistory of Sublime Princes of the Royal Secret in Paris with power to carry the Rite of Perfection to America. Among those who signed the paper was the Duke of Chartres, afterwards the Duke of Orleans, 'Philip Egalite', grand Master both of the Grand Orient and the Templars, and Morin himself is described as a Grand Perfect Elect and Past Sublime Master., etc., of all orders of Masonry.

"Now it has been stated that Morin was a Jew, but the Jewish Encyclopaedia, in its article on Freemasonry, says that this point is in doubt. What is certain is that when Morin arrived in America he gave powers to a number of deputies who certainly were Jews. Thus, for example his deputy inspector, Henry Francken, appointed Moses M. Hayes at Boston, and Hayes in his turn made Brother Da Dosta deputy inspector-general for south Carolina, Solomon Bush deputy for Pennsylvania, and B.M. Spitzer deputy for Georgia."

I often wondered about that, because Harriman was in Skull and Bones too, and I always assumed he was Jewish.  So I wondered what a Jewish family like his was doing cavorting with the likes of the Bushes.
Letter from another reader:

My mother knew a retired opera singer who sang with Caruso and who also dined with the Rockefellers when she toured Europe - she played Prague, Vienna, Budapest and Milan among other venues.  She got invited to their home, I guess, because this was the heyday of opera.  She told my mother a lot of things and was on to the global elitist issue way back then.  She stated that the Rockefellers were from Turkey and their original name was (and I can only sound this out, not spell it)
Raw-gen-mute ....which apparently was the name they used in Turkey.  She said the servants at the house told her that (and a few other things)

Lyndon Johnson also a Sephardic Jew.

LBJ's "Passionate Attachment" to Israel

More about Sabbatean or "Crypto Jews"

David Roggenfelder


Another Reader challenges these sources:

I read the article on your website 'Are Rockefeller's & Sotomayor Illuminati Jews ? I'll tell you an interesting story
about this article written by Willie Martin.

About two years ago Mark  told me about the book in question 'Americans of Jewish Descent' by Malcolm H. Stern.
I checked the Toronto Public Library website and they have one copy of this rare book at the huge downtown reference
branch. I went there one day before work and looked over the book to find out if there was Jewish Rockefeller's mentioned.
To my disappointment all I could find in the genealogy section and the names index was one listing for a Rockefeller and I
looked it up in the genealogy chart. It was a Rockefeller that I never heard of married to a Jewish person I never heard of. No
'smoking gun' here. I photocopied the genealogy chart and the index and the cover to the book. I e-mailed Mark the info.

I also took the book 'The Grandees' by Stephen Birmingham out of the library. He does a lot of talking but doesn't back it up with anything substantial as far as 'real' information goes.

I've learned to question and do my own research on any 'conspiracy facts' info. Unfortunately I don't have the time but in this case I'm glad I put a few hours of research into Stephen's claim.

The best book I have read dealing with genealogies is 'Bloodlines of the Illuminati' by Fritz Springmeier. He has a chapter on the Rockefeller's but I don't believe he mentions anything about any 'Jewish' origin.

  I did  find  a publication by the National States Rights Party (NSRP). Their publication, a newspaper was called 'The Thunderbolt' and it was a right wing 'conspiracy' paper. Eustace Mullins was a frequent reader and commenter. Finding the issue with vice-President Nelson Rockefeller's supposed Jewish ancestry would be extremely difficult and probably not that accurate.

National States Rights Party - Wikipedia (so you know it's a biased article)

Eustace Mullins & National States Rights Party (near the middle of the page). I personally like Mullins.

I would not doubt if the Rockefellers were of Jewish origin but I need proof. In the end who cares if they are of Jewish or Baptist origin. They are lying, murdering, aristocratic crooks.


Mel Rockefeller Memo to Four Generals in the Trump Administration


The Astonishing Israeli Concession of 1967

In a triumphant moment, Israel’s flag was hoisted over the newly conquered Temple Mount—then quickly taken down.

On June 6, 1967, Major Arik Achmon, chief intelligence officer for Brigade 55 of Israel’s paratrooper reservists, celebrated his 34th birthday while standing on a rooftop in an ultra-Orthodox Jewish neighborhood that overlooked no-man’s-land, a strip of minefields and barbed wire and fortified bunkers separating Israeli-held West Jerusalem from Jordanian-held East Jerusalem. Raising binoculars, he could see little through the near-total darkness and the smoke rising from artillery shells falling on either side of the urban divide. But when he radioed headquarters, seeking an update on Jordanian troop movements, the answer was the same he’d been receiving all day: Sorry, we know as little as you do.

The astonishing, untold story of the battle for Jerusalem was how ill-prepared Israel was for the most mythic battle of its history: The paratroopers’ conquest of East Jerusalem and the Old City, including the two sites holiest to Judaism, the Temple Mount and the Western Wall. Few battles with such fateful consequences were as haphazard and unplanned. Despite periodic accusations that Israel provoked war to seize East Jerusalem, Achmon told me in a recent conversation that there were no accessible contingency plans, and little intelligence.
More Stories

    Israeli soldiers sit in front of the Western Wall in Jerusalem's Old City.
    The Six-Day War Was a Step Backward for Zionism
    Michael Koplow
    A Christian monk, a Muslim woman, and an Orthodox Jewish man
    How the Six-Day War Transformed Religion
    Sigal Samuel
    Construction workers remove debris from destroyed shops in Mosul in November 2017.
    All ISIS Has Left Is Money. Lots of It.
    David Kenner
    Men wait to be screened following their evacuation from Baghouz, Syria, on February 22.
    The ‘Caliphate’ Is Dead, but Americans Might Not Be Any Safer
    Kathy Gilsinan

Even more astonishing was the Israeli decision, at the moment of victory, to concede sovereignty over the Temple Mount, Judaism’s holiest site.

In the weeks leading up to war, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser had expelled UN peacekeeping forces from Sinai, initiated a massive troop buildup on the border with Israel, promised the imminent destruction of Israel and blockaded the Straits of Tiran, Israel’s southern shipping route. Finally, on June 5, Israeli planes launched a preemptive strike, destroying most of the Egyptian air force on the ground. That same morning, Jordan’s King Hussein, who had signed a military pact with Egypt, launched a bombardment against Jewish neighborhoods in West Jerusalem. Israel’s Prime Minister Levi Eshkol sent a message to Hussein: Cease firing and we won’t attack. Hussein, convinced by Nasser that victorious Egyptian forces were on their way to Tel Aviv, ignored the appeal.

Paratrooper Brigade 55 had been formed a year before. Though some of its men were veterans of Israel’s commando raids against terrorist bases in the 1950s, most were young reservists in their 20s without combat experience. Most damaging of all, Brigade 55 had prepared for the wrong war. In the weeks leading up to Israel’s preemptive strike in Sinai, Achmon and his team had prepared intelligence reports for the conquest of El Arish, a heavily fortified town on the Sinai coast. “I knew every Egyptian position there,” Achmon told me. “And I knew next to nothing about Jerusalem.”

But then, as Jordanian artillery hit hundreds of Israeli apartments in West Jerusalem, the paratroopers were dispatched to Jerusalem and given 12 hours to prepare for the attack. The mission was, at least initially, confined to stopping Jordanian shelling of Jewish neighborhoods and rescuing a besieged Israeli unit stationed on Mount Scopus, the sole Israeli enclave in East Jerusalem. The limited operation excluded the Old City and its sacred sites.

“Our assignment was impossible,” Achmon said. “You can’t plan an urban battle in 12 hours. You can’t attack fortified positions without adequate intelligence. But we were given the mission and we didn’t for a moment doubt that we would fulfill it. We knew there would be a very high price, but the mission was essential.”

At 2 a.m. on June 6, the paratroopers, commanded by Colonel Motta Gur, crossed no-man’s-land. One of Brigade 55’s three battalions attacked the Jordanian position known as Ammunition Hill, and fought one of the bloodiest battles of the war, hand-to-hand combat in trenches. Another battalion headed toward the Rockefeller Museum, a massive compound built by the Rockefeller family in the 1930s to house archeological artifacts. The Rockefeller was adjacent to the walled Old City and would be the staging point for attack if the government gave the order. But lacking street maps, some units got lost. One officer stopped an elderly Palestinian man on the street and asked him: Which way to the Rockefeller? Another officer missed the turn toward the Rockefeller and led his men directly into a line of Jordanian fortifications. The streets filled with the dead and wounded. 


The Reluctant Rockefeller Speaks Out

Eileen Rockefeller talks to Sandra McElwaine about growing up Rockefeller and how the clan is getting on now.


America's Gilded Age: Robber Barons and Captains of Industry

“The Gilded Age” is a term that is often used to describe the late 19th century from around 1870 to 1900. It was coined by the author Mark Twain in the title of his 1873 novel The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today. This term was the ideal description for the time, suggesting that society’s corruption was thinly covered, or gilded, with a layer of shiny gold that made it look shiny and appealing on the outside. During the Gilded Age, which was part of the Second Industrial Revolution, the country underwent an impressive economic expansion. Much of this growth was courtesy of railroads, which now spanned from coast to coast, as well as factories, steel, and the coal mining industry. Big business boomed, with technology such as typewriters, cash registers, and adding machines helping to transform how work was done. The economic explosion included not only industrial growth but also a growth in agricultural technology such as mechanical reapers.

With this rapid growth came the rise of a class of extremely wealthy individuals who made up a very small percentage of society. Many of these individuals made their fortune through greed, corruption, and a lack of government regulations. Meanwhile, a large number of people suffered from crushing debt, unemployment, and racial discrimination, and there was an increase in immigration as foreigners sought opportunities they couldn’t find in their homelands.
Captains of Industry and Robber Barons

The wealthy elite of the late 19th century consisted of industrialists who amassed their fortunes as robber barons and captains of industry. Both can be defined as business tycoons, but there was a significant difference in the way that they made their fortunes. The term “robber baron” dates back to the Middle Ages. Robber barons typically employed ruthless and often questionable methods such as using predatory practices to eliminate their competition and develop a monopoly in their industry. Often, they had little empathy for workers. Captains of industry, however, were often philanthropists. They made their wealth in a way that would benefit society, such as providing more jobs or increasing productivity.
John D. Rockefeller

Born in 1937, John D. Rockefeller became one of the richest men in the world as the founder of the Standard Oil Company. Standard Oil dominated the oil industry, controlling roughly 90 percent of the refineries and pipelines in the United States by the early part of the 1880s. Rockefeller’s actions can be considered those of either a robber baron or a captain of industry. His philanthropic efforts resemble those of a captain of industry, as over the course of his life, his donations to charitable causes exceeded $500 million. Unfortunately, he has also been accused of predatory behavior that would eliminate his competition, and his Standard Oil Corporation was the first example of a U.S. business trust.
Andrew Carnegie

Andrew Carnegie and his parents immigrated to the U.S. from Scotland when he was 13. He built his fortune by investing in the steel industry and became the owner of Carnegie Steel Company, which by 1889 was the largest steel company in the world. Unfortunately, Carnegie engaged in tactics that were not in the best interests of his workers. In 1892, he attempted to lower worker wages at one of his steel plants, an act that resulted in the Homestead Strike and numerous deaths. Despite this action, Carnegie was extremely active in terms of philanthropy. In his efforts to contribute to society, he established the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the New York Public Library, and a college that would become part of Carnegie Mellon University. He also wrote “The Gospel of Wealth,” an article that argued that the wealthy have a responsibility to contribute to the greater good of society.
J.P. Morgan

John Pierpoint Morgan was a financier from a wealthy family and is considered to have been a robber baron by many. He invested in Thomas Edison and the Edison Electricity Company, helped to create General Electric and International Harvester, formed J.P. Morgan & Company, and gained control of half of the country’s railroad mileage. He also created the first billion-dollar company, U.S. Steel. At one point in his life, he was a board member of as many as 48 corporations. He was believed to head a money trust that controlled the banking industry and was commonly considered a figurehead of Wall Street. He created a monopoly by slashing the workforce and their pay in order to maximize profits while eliminating the competition. Workers’ wages were often as low as a dollar a day or less, and there was an increase in workplace fatalities even as profits grew. When confronted with the possibility of regulations that could threaten his bottom line, he and other robber barons of the time contributed money to ensure that their candidate, William McKinley, was elected president in 1896.

Despite the numerous negatives associated with how J.P. Morgan built his wealth, some of his actions did benefit society. He helped bail out the federal government twice during an economic crisis, first in 1895 and again in 1907. As a result, this financier is also considered to be a captain of industry by some.
Henry Ford

Automaker Henry Ford was a captain of industry who treated his workers fairly well. He believed that well-paid workers would be happier and more efficient. For that reason, he instituted a $5-a-day pay rate, which was twice as much as other auto manufacturers paid. In addition, during a time when workers were required to work ten hours a day, six days a week, Ford scheduled his workers for eight-hour days, five days a week. Ford greatly disliked institutional charity, but he did contribute personal funds to organizations that he created, such as the Henry Ford Hospital for the working poor who could afford to pay some of the cost of their medical care. Over the course of his life, he donated approximately $14 million to this institution. Other organizations created by Ford included the 80-acre Valley Farm for orphaned boys, a school for African-American children in Georgia, and a Detroit trade school. He also was part of a peace ship to Europe that hoped to put an end to World War I, and he paid for work camps for boys during the Great Depression. Ford was not considered to be a robber baron, but he was anti-Semitic, and his anti-Jewish commentary helped to legitimize such sentiments.

    The Gilded Age
    Meaning and History of the Term “Robber Baron”
    Gilded Age, 1878-89
    Politics in the Gilded Age (PDF)
    The Gilded Age, 1870-1900: The Second Industrial Revolution
    Andrew Carnegie: Man of Steel (video)
    Biography: J.P. Morgan
    Robber Barons or Captains of Industry?
    John D. Rockefeller
    Robber Barons
    J.P. Morgan
    The Philanthropy Hall of Fame: Henry Ford
    19 Robber Barons Who Built and Ruled America
    Gilded Age 1870-1900 (PDF)
    Sherman Anti-Trust Act (1890)



Rockefeller FoundationPosted 3 years ago under Uncategorized

One of six children and the first American worth a billion dollars, John Davison Rockefeller, Sr. goes down in history for many things, but being rich is just one of them. From coal, kerosene and gasoline to oil and petroleum, Rockefeller was a modern industrialist and “philanthropist” who co-founded the globalist Standard Oil company and propagated the first US chemical-industrial business regime, that would eventually serve as the “fuel” for many of the Western preventable disease epidemics, via the chemistry of inserting chemicals and carcinogens into the food, water and medicine supply we all unfortunately know as mainstream America today. Rockefeller Sr. died of pneumonia in 1937, worth over $300 billion. Rockefeller, who ruled the US oil industry (about 90% of it), also led a double life, according to his wife Eliza–he was a known philanderer, adulterer and bigamist, and the self-proclaimed “philanthropist” was a “big-league huckster” who had devised the structured business strategy of donating large slices of his wealth to (carefully chosen) medicine and scientific research, but what nobody knew was that this research supported and benefited his corrupt business model, exploiting chemicals through capitalism (1), while being admired as a guy who gives away his riches for “worthy” causes. Andrew Carnegie (Scottish-American Industrialist who started Tuskagee Institute) was another powerful industrialist of the period, and a business magnate and “philanthropist” who ruled the steel industry.

John D. Rockefeller – Son of a con artist aka “Devil Bill” who sold quack cures

It wasn’t a big wonder, looking back, and seeing why Rockefeller took the route he did with his money. As a young adult, he began a produce commission business with a partner, then moved into commercial oil, undermining the then expensive whale oil (lighting fuel) business. He was done selling “foodstuffs” and bought out Clark brothers for a little over $70k. Rockefeller, Andrews & Flagler was the predecessor of the Standard Oil Company. His postwar expansion of the oil business sparked the beginning of the use of oil refinery waste.

By 1870, Rockefeller’s Standard Oil of Ohio was one of the largest shippers of oil and kerosene in the United States. That’s when the railroads were fighting for traffic, and that’s when Rockefeller created a cartel to control freight rates, called the South Improvement Company, in collusion with his Standard Oil and other cohorts from main oil industry outlets. Of course, the cartel received preferential treatment with rebates up to 50% for their products. They made press releases about “increasing freight charges” to undermine independent oil well owners’ businesses (trying to squeeze them out mafia-style), which stirred up revenge vandalism and boycotts. Again, crooked business and cut-throat politics paint a true picture of the business capitalist, tyrant and mogul’s history–a man who led a double life, on and off the “court.” Eventually the state of Pennsylvania revoked the cartel’s “charter.”

Rockefeller wasn’t shaken. He continued to buy out the competition at any cost, making secret deals, and heading straight into what is referred to as the “Cleveland Massacre.” Anyone who bucked Rockefeller’s plans would be run straight into bankruptcy, and John would buy up or sell all their remaining assets at auctions. Still, Rockefeller called himself the “industry’s savior” and “an angel of mercy,” simply running blind of any business ethics, morals or values. Standard quickly expanded into developing over 300 oil-based products, from tar and paint to Vaseline petroleum “jelly” and chewing gum. All of the sudden, Rockefeller began the whole nightmare of mixing dangerous chemicals with food, candy and personal care products that would begin the mass infection of human cells, crippling of immunity, and overall health detriment. This was a plan. A career that began with food would soon turn evil and insidiously capitalistic, all under the umbrella and mask of philanthropy.

In 1879, Rockefeller was indicted by Pennsylvania on charges of monopolizing the oil trade

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania made a national issue of Standard Oil’s business practices, and put Rockefeller under great strain in the 1880s. Bad press was abound. He was quoted as saying; “All the fortune that I have made has not served to compensate me for the anxiety of that period.” This was the beginning of the anti-trust movement. Rockefeller’s business model was to bully, offend, then “correct” later, enough to keep moving forward.

To protect themselves from the repurcussions of their own tyranny, the Rockefeller empire owned dozens of different corporations (like Monsanto does today), each of which operate in a different state, yet putting all of the business holdings in one trust (a corporation of corporations, in other words), with nine trustees, including Rockefeller of course, who ran all the forty companies involved under the big umbrella. It became the most feared business in the world, at the time, immune to lawsuits and competition, thanks to the most corrupt business practices North America had seen. His empire included tens of thousands of oil wells, thousands of miles of pipeline, thousands of tank cars and a hundred thousand workers, basically dominating the world oil market. Noone could foresee that Rockefeller would support the Nazi war effort in WWII by supplying submarines off the coast of Italy with fuel. (2)

Turn of the century – Rockefeller competes with Andrew Carnegie and violates Sherman Antitrust Act

As Rockefeller expanded his business into iron ore and its transportation, Andrew Carnegie–the steel magnate, became his competition and the subject of many newspaper articles and cartoons. Rockefeller dipped into crude oil production in Indiana and West Virginia after he nearly tapped out the Pennsylvania oil fields. The tycoon and mafia mogul was looking to retire. Rockefeller and his son kept consolidating oil interests until the early 1900s when New Jersey changed its incorporation laws to favor the single holding company. They took the bait and a decade later, the Supreme Court found Standard Oil Company in VIOLATION of the SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT. Rockefeller at the time owned two-thirds of the refined oil market and about an eighth of the supply of US crude oil.

It was obvious now. The trust was a completely illegal monopoly and so was ordered to be broken up into at least thirty parts. Familiar names like Conoco, Chevron, Exxon, Mobil, and Pennzoil were the new entities, soon to reuinite as “partners in crime.” Of course, Rockefeller retained “proportionate” shares in ALL 34 companies. Rockefeller still profits immensely from the big “break up” of Standard Oil, and just ten years later, the 34 companies’ combined NET WORTH rose 500%, and in turn Rockefeller’s wealth had risen to nearly a billion dollars. Just more dirty business and filthy politics to follow.

1913: Rockefeller Foundation and globalist institution founded by John D. “Senior” with his son, John D. “Junior”

Besides funding public health schools (Johns Hopkins and Harvard) and attempting to develop vaccines, the Rockefeller foundation funded GERMAN EUGENICS PROGRAMS (plans to exterminate via genecide all “lessor” or less superior humans), including financing the laboratory of the scientist for which Josef Mengele worked before Auschwitz. The Foundation also gave to Kaiser Wilhem Institute for Brain Research and more psychotic and inhumane eugenics experiments, that would be further carried out en masse by Hitler’s Third Reich. The Foundation also dabbled in women’s contraception (another early movement towards population control and reduction) with their “Medical Sciences Division.”

Rockefeller helps the Nazis build a psychotic, genocidal empire

What’s most disturbing about the flow of Rockefeller money is that the Foundation funded Nazi racial studies even AFTER IT WAS CLEAR that the research was being used as propaganda to demonize the Jews. Rockefeller was proud of it too, and the ideology was very close to Nazi ideology, so Rockefeller continuted to fund it for YEARS AFTER the passage of the 1935 Nuremberg racial laws.

What was the overall, long-term strategy for the Rockefeller Foundation? John D. Rockefeller and his Standard Oil Company invested millions of dollars (about 80 million Reichsmarks) to help drive the Nazi war machine, in return for chemical, pharmaceutical and petrochemical industries seized from occupied countries. This would build his American “empire” no matter the outcome of the war (so it didn’t matter to him who won). In fact, the Nazis partnered with Rockefeller and set up a company called Standard IG Farben.

Rockefeller sent aviation fuel to IG Farben (5) and lead to enable Hitler to attack Poland and France. He sold 20 million in fuel to the German air force so they could bomb London. He supplied the Nazis with oil diverted through Switzerland and refueled German submarines in the Channel Islands. It was pure treason as trading with the enemy, but Rockefeller just got a slap on the wrist (a measly $5k fine) by President Roosevelt, who was being blackmailed by Rockefeller, since US crucial war-time oil supplies could be cut off by the industrial huckster.

IG Farben went on to build Auschwitz, the largest industrial complex known in Europe for manufacturing chemicals, explosives, and exterminating millions of Jews and other “undesirable” scapegoats of the Germans. Auschwitz was the largest extermination camp in human history, and Rockefeller knew about it. How do we know this? On several occasions, when the Allies were supposed to bomb Auschwitz, Rockefeller used his influence through John J. McCloy, a former legal counselor to IG Farben AND Assistant Secretary of War, to cancel the bombing raids. Not one single bomb ever fell on IG Farben’s headquarters in Franfurt, even though other German industrial cities were bombed, and other parts of Frankfurt, nothing would harm the “Rockefeller industrial complex” where John D. Rockefeller, Jr. strategically invested millions.

On a number of occasions, when orders were given by the Allies to bomb the complex, Rockefeller used his influence through John J. McCloy, Assistant Secretary of War (who was a former legal counselor to IG Farben), to cancel the bombing raids, much to the chagrin of some of the Allied commanders. Furthermore, not one bomb fell on IG Farben’s Headquarters back in Germany, at Frankfurt. Astounding, at a time when German industrial cities were widely bombed and pulverized, including Frankfurt itself.

Rockefeller “Jr.” – the Post WWII Industrial Emperor of Chemical Agriculture and Chemical Medicine

The following is cumulative research, including synthesis of facts from a study done on the Rockefeller and IG Farben connection, as published by Natural News in 2008, and presented by Gabriel Donohoe, a researcher and natural health therapist living in Ireland.

After the heroic efforts of the US and Great Britain to defeat Hitler and the Nazis, many more horrors came to light, as mass graves were found, the gas chambers were discovered in masse, and Hitler’s plan to rule the world with a “superior race” by killing off all the undesirables was completely uncovered. However, certain US politicians and powerful wealthy families admired Hitler and his insane methods during his rise to power, and they schemed and plotted to continue the regime’s hate crimes, only this time it would be a “slow burner” of chemical warfare, on the people, by means of chemical-laced food, chemical-laced drinking water, and chemical-laced medicine for the ills of consuming poisons, slowly.

Big Pharma was about to become massive, as was the vaccine industry, the processed food industry, and within three decades, the biotechnology industry of GMO, all propagated by America’s lying mass media. It was the 1950s, and everyone in America believed it was time for economic growth and prosperity, but as scores of Nazi war criminals (scientists) were let out of jail for mass murder (they only served 4 to 7 years), they were put to work by America, to advance domestic petrochemicals in food and personal care products, chemical agriculture, chemical drugs and chemical-laced vaccines. (8)

These vicious criminals were the industrial prisoners that worked for IG Farben (Hitler’s pharma scientists that manufactured explosives, chemical weapons, Zyklon B and the gas chambers), with which the second world war would not have even been possible. Who knew besides Rockefeller and a handful of powerful US politicians that the rich would be getting richer by poisoning the American people, slowly but surely. This was the plan: employ German scientists to fuel preventable disease epidemics and then treat the symptoms with chemical medicine–and make a fortune off Americans’ demise.

Between the World Wars, IG Farben (Interessengemeinschaft Farben), was a cartel of German chemical and pharmaceutical companies like Bayer, BASF, AGFA and Hoechst (now known as Aventis). Today that chemical agricultural conglomerate can be recognized as Bayer, Monsanto, Dow Chemical, Dupont, Syngenta, BASF and Cargill. On the pharma side today there is Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, Merck & Co., Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, and Gilead Sciences. The AMA (10), FDA (11) and CDC (12) were all businesses at this point and were on board with the plan of deregulation and mass infection and sterilization of the middle and lower class (again, eugenics). (6) (7)

President Roosevelt partners with Rockefeller to exploit the knowledge of Nazi scientists for American corporations This was the beginning of the mass influx of “mad scientists” who would go to work in the United States for a mission called “Project Paperclip,” headed up by President Roosevelt to supposedly “exploit the knowledge of Nazi scientists.” A few years later, the Nuremberg War Criminal Tribunal convicted 24 of the I.G. Farben executives for mass murder, slavery and other crimes against humanity; however, in less than 7 years, every single murderer was released, and began consulting American corporations.

Rockefeller himself (with the help of JJ McCloy) was pivotal in releasing Dr. Fritz ter Meer, the director of IG Farben, from prison after just four years (though he committed mass murder and genocide). Meer developed the nerve gas Zyklon-B, that killed millions of Jews in the gas chambers. Meer returned to work for Bayer immediately, where he served as Chairman for more than a decade. Meer went on to initiate Codex Alimentarius in 1962, which was nurtured by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Codex Alimentarius was a cover, a front to destroy the natural food industries of America and dismantle the vitamin and supplement industries in general, all with the motive of promoting disease and selling more pharmaceuticals. In fact, today’s pharmaceutical regime is a direct legacy of IG Farben and the Nazi war criminals who steered the original cartel for Hitler. America’s “first family” – the Rockefellers, also the unspoken partner of IG Farben, the Chemical Industrial Complex of Hitler in WWII


“Dark Secrets of the Rockefeller Family” Documentary on Rockefeller/Nazi link:


The “Population Council” of 1952 and the evil eugenics plans of Rockefeller. The council president for the “Population Council” was Frederick Osborn, also the head of the American Eugenics Society (support for the forced sterilization of “subhuman” individuals)


“When medicine becomes murder” – how Rockefeller’s eugenics mirrored Nazi propaganda: view the eugenics (population control and reduction) posters that were published via truth media and natural health news:

I.G. Farben, Rockefeller, and U.S. Big Pharma carry forward Hitler’s “ways” of slaughtering, just at a slower pace

Hitler used what we now call “Biotechnology” to wage war on his enemies using chemical warfare and to torture (and kill) his prisoners of war – namely 6,000,000 Jews. Hitler used the “Big Pharma” of the time – the monster-pharmaceutical-conglomeration of the early nineteenth century, IG Farben, as his means to the “end” – the proposed end of any human who was not of the “Master Race” he believed he could actually create, maintain, and use to rule under his New World Order. It was eugenics. Using chemicals to pollute the food and medicine of his enemies, Hitler conquered countries like it was nothing, one at a time. Without IG Farben, many historians say that Hitler could NOT have done all the damage he did. Hitler used Zyklon B gas in the gas chambers to distinguish humans. Hitler had his Nazi police feeding the Jews fluoride in the water to weaken them so they could not rebel or escape. Hitler had top scientists studying food additives, synthetic preservatives, highly experimental vaccines full of toxins.

Chemical, synthetic pesticides, people’s prescription medications and sodium fluoride contaminate US tap water today

The US may have been responsible for ending the war on the battlefield with the Germans, but the war FOR cancer was just beginning, and Big Pharma USA was about to be the most powerful and deadly world “entity” for the next 70 years. Politicians and the richest US moguls were thrilled by the idea of controlling the chemical medicine for citizens who were being sickened by the food, water and mercury-laden vaccines. (9) This was the true beginning of “biotech” – before the word was associated with GMO. A few decades after Rockefeller built up US pharma industry, the “Green Revolution,” which was nothing but a cover name for mass chemical fertilization of crops, began dominating US staple crop production, such as corn, soy, canola and sugar beets. New farming “technology” would include the insertion of pesticidal genes into the seeds of US crops, and sickness and preventable disease epidemics and statistics would be catapulted. Rockefeller, one could say, single-handedly catapulted, with his family fortune, what we know today as the “sick care industry.”

In the 1990s, the Rockefeller foundation shifted a portion its agriculture emphasis to Africa (for more eugenics and genocide). In 2006, the foundation joined forces with another eugenics “master” Bill Gates and his front, “The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation” – in a $150 million effort to “fight hunger” (infuse GMO food and forced vaccinations on the impoverished people).

In an interview marking the 100 year anniversary of the Rockefeller Foundation, Judith Rodin explained to This Is Africa that Rockefeller has been involved in Africa since their beginning in three main areas – health, agriculture and education, though agriculture has been and continues to be their largest investment in Africa. What more insidious strategy can there be to make money than to make people sick and then give them chemical medicine for the symptoms.

Pay it forward to 2016: Rockefeller and the Zika Virus – origins of corrupt money and big pharma

Mainstream media will never share the true origins of the Zika virus, which traces its origins back to none other than the Rockefeller Foundation. This virus can be purchased online in three different strains and is offered to any qualified level-2 biohazard laboratory. And who has the money to create a laboratory that costs about $10 million? What safeguards are there besides being rich? Although Zika virus has not been proven to be patented by Rockefeller Foundation, numerous references to the virus being “isolated” by a former employee of Rockefeller (Dr. Jordi Casals) have been discovered and published. Dr. Casals, who also discovered the Lassa Virus, died in 2004, and served with the Spanish Army before earning his medical degree from the University of Barcelona back in 1934. Casals worked at Cornell University Medical College right before WWII, when he JOINED THE ROCKEFELLER INSTITUTE of Medical Research in Manhattan, as reported by the New York Times. (3)

Today, there is a massive hoax underway that claims the Zika virus is responsible for horrific birth defects, but science and history are proving this is not true at all. Is Rockefeller aiding in vaccine research or inadvertently supporting bioterrorism? It is well-known fact that the Rockefellers are heavily involved in the Bilderberg group–where David Rockefeller is the founder (and life-long member), bumping shoulders with the likes of Bill Gates, Hillary Clinton, David Rockefeller Jr, Henry Kissinger, and Tony Blair, to name a few. Plus, Rockefeller funds planned parenthood, which is also a eugenics political medium for population control. (4)

In the year 2000: Rockefeller hinted to friends and cohorts (partners in crime) about “an event” that was going to happen (about a year before 9/11) that would catapult the US into war with Iraq and Afghanistan. Did Rockefeller mean the planned demolition of the World Trade Centers and Building 7? By having a war on terror, American citizen’s liberty will constantly be taken away. This may have been an inside plan. What’s next? – Some believe the Rockefellers aim to install an RFID chip into all humans for tracking and control. Who really runs the US government?

“Revealed: The men who own and run the US Government”

“The Invisible Empire” (documentary film on YouTube):















Rockefeller: A Traitor for Vice-President


Legacy: A Big Gift in Arkansas, With Rockefeller Wealth


How Rockefeller Founded Big Pharma And Waged War On Natural Cures


Dawn of the oil industryGuts, greed and gushers

ExxonMobil and Royal Dutch Shell dominate world oil. A century ago, they were born fighting each other

JUST over 100 years ago Standard Oil, from which both Exxon and Mobil sprang, was the undisputed leader of the global oil industry. American trustbusters were soon hot on the heels of its competition-killing owner, John D. Rockefeller. So too was a scrappy Anglo-Dutch company, the product of a merger of Shell Oil with Royal Dutch in 1907, which had defied fearsome odds to muscle onto Standard’s home turf in America.


2. “Getting along with their own business“ The secret pact of Standard Oil with the Nazis and why Adolf Eichmann was silenced


10 Reasons People Hated The Rockefellers

10. Stole A Railroad
9. Workers Get What They Are Worth
8. The Ludlow Massacre
7. Women And Children Terrified
6. Printed Fake News
5. Kept The Mine Workers In Poverty
4. Meddled In Education
3. Refused To Give Out War Loan
2. Income Tax Evasion
1. Troubles Of A Sincere Man


100 years on, Rockefeller Foundation still promotes 'the well-being of mankind'


The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (1910-1939)

By Cera R. Lawrence
Published: 2011-04-21
Keywords: Eugenics, Reproductive rights

From its founding in 1910 until it closed its doors in 1939, the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York was the center of the American Eugenics Movement. Charles Davenport, a geneticist and biologist, founded the ERO, and served as its director until 1934. Under the direction of Davenport and his associate, superintendant Harry H. Laughlin, the influence of the ERO on science and public policy waxed during the early twentieth century until the beginning of World War II. The ERO is important to the history of embryology because it played a key role in the application of scientific theories about heredity to the formulation of social policies about human reproduction.

Davenport became the director of the Biological Laboratory at Cold Spring Harbor in 1898. In 1904 he convinced the Carnegie Institution of Washington (CIW) to fund the Station for Experimental Evolution, located on the same campus. Davenport was excited by the potential social benefit of studies in human heredity, as was his wife, Gertrude Crotty Davenport, also an embryologist and geneticist.


Depopulation by government edict

In 1922, Margaret Sanger wrote The Pivot of Civilization with an introduction by eugenicist H. G. Wells. The Rockefeller Foundation "enthusiastically supported the concept of 'eugenics,' which encourages the reproductive efforts of those deemed to have 'good' genes, while discouraging or stopping procreation by undesirables. But Rockefeller and others were anxious to go even further to mold America's breeding patterns along evolutionary lines." [1] John D. Rockefeller Jr., per the advice of Raymond B. Fosdick, provided financial backing for Margaret Sanger's Planned Parenthood movement. [2] Sanger, a feminist and birth control activist established the first family planning clinics in New York City. Several U.S. foundations financed eugenic research, including the Carnegie Institution, which funded Davenport's eugenic studies at Cold Spring Harbor, and the Rockefeller Foundation, which gave grants in the 1930s for eugenic research at the Galton Laboratory at University College in London and to the Cornell Medical School in New York. [3]

Advocates for population control and the study of eugenics include Theodore Roosevelt, Charles Wilson, president of Harvard and Irving Fisher, president of Yale and president of the Eugenics Research Association in the 1920s plus a host of other very public vocal figures. [4] President Theodore Roosevelt appointed Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. to the U.S. Supreme Court where he served from 1902 to 1932. Holmes was an advocate for selective breeding and issued the sterilization verdict in the case of Carrie Buck in 1927. He said, "It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting Fallopian tubes. Three generations of imbeciles are enough." [5] Sir Frederick Pollock, a Pilgrims Society member and law professor at Oxford, was the editor of Law Quarterly Review from 1885 to 1919. He was in close communication with Harvard-educated Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. during a sixty-year period of time. Researcher Charles Savoie maintains that the Pilgrims Society was closely connected to America's Supreme Court for more than a century. [6]

The Rockefeller Foundation financed what is known as Psychiatric Genetics, a new specialty. The Foundation restructured medical training in Germany including managing the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity under the direction of Swiss psychiatrist Ernst Rudin, supported by his trusty protégés, Otmar Verschuer and Dr. Franz J. Kallmann. In 1932, the British eugenics' movement appointed Dr. Rudin as president of the worldwide Eugenics Federation. The eugenics movement promoted the killing or sterilization of burdensome people, individuals that Henry Kissinger referred to as "useless eaters."  Rockefeller funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Eugenics Institute in Germany, founded in 1927.

The Bush family joined John D. Rockefeller and the British Royal Family in sponsoring the eugenics initiatives that gave rise to Hitler's racial hygiene programs. Prescott Bush was later found guilty of trading with the Nazis during WWII. According to court records, the Rockefeller family and their Standard Oil Company supported Hitler more than they did the allies during the war. In fact, one judge declared Rockefeller guilty of treason. Dr. Gary Glum documented the insidious eugenics programs to create a "superior race," which were initially sponsored not by Adolph Hitler, but by the American elite like the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman, Morgan, DuPont, Kellogg and Bush families.

Hitler, who had been financed by international bankers, became Chancellor of the Third Reich on January 30, 1933. Wilhelm Frick, the minister of the interior, introduced the early sterilization law which was enacted within six months after Hitler was appointed chancellor. Sterilization was used for "life unworthy of life." Certain individuals who reportedly warranted serialization included those with: "congenital feeblemindedness (now called mental deficiency), an estimated 200,000; manic depressive insanity, 20,000; schizophrenia, 80,000; epilepsy, 60,000; Huntington's chorea (a hereditary brain disorder), 600; hereditary blindness, 4,000; hereditary deafness, 16,000; grave bodily malformation, 20,000; and hereditary alcoholism, 10,000. The projected total of 410,000 was considered only preliminary, drawn mostly from people already in institutions; it was assumed that much greater numbers of people would eventually be identified and sterilized."

After the Nazis took power, I.G. Farben and Rockefeller's Standard Oil merged into a single entity which contained beneficial provisions for each company. I.G. Farben was, until 1937, controlled by the Warburg family who had collaborated with Rockefeller in crafting Nazi eugenics. Standard Oil maintained their alliance with I.G. Farben even after the U.S. entered the war. In 1940-41, I.G. Farben constructed a large industrial complex in Poland adjacent the Auschwitz concentration camp where they planned to use slave labor to make gasoline from coal. Standard-Germany president Emil Helfferich admitted that Standard Oil financed part of the operations at Auschwitz. [10]

In the fall of 1941, Secretary of War Henry Stimson contacted Dr. Frank B. Jewett, president of the National Academy of Sciences, to discuss the further development of biological warfare. This was prior to America's entry into World War II, but according to his diary Secretary Stimson was well aware of imminent events. Shortly afterwards, President Roosevelt authorized Stimson to create a civilian agency to supervise biological warfare under the jurisdiction of the Federal Security Agency. George Merck, owner of Merck Pharmaceutical and close adviser to Roosevelt, was appointed director of the new War Research Service. [11]

Frank McDougall participated in the area of public health within the old League of Nations. He made the connection between community health, nutrition, and agricultural development and economic policy. The U.N., in a conference in Hot Springs between October 16 and November 1, 1945, formulated the U.N. Interim Commission on Food and Agriculture. Officials drafted the constitution of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). McDougall was a chief architect and promoter of the organization. [12]

The Bureau of Human Heredity relocated from London to Copenhagen in 1947 where they moved into a newly constructed building paid for by the Rockefeller Foundation. The initial International Congress in Human Genetics after World War II was convened in Copenhagen in 1956. Verschuer, Rudin's protégé, was by then a member of the American Eugenics Society, synonymous with Rockefeller's Population Council. Dr. Kallmann, a director, also organized the American Society of Human Genetics which directed the Human Genome Project. Later, the Rockefellers relocated the U.S. eugenics movement to their family offices where they also controlled future population control and abortion advocacy groups. The Eugenics Society later became the Society for the Study of Social Biology. [13]

U.S. State Department Policy Planning Study #23, 1948, headed by George F. Kennan, concluded, "We have about 50 percent of the world's wealth, but only 6.3% of its population. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and daydreaming and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world benefaction. We should cease to talk about vague and unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of the living standards and democratization. The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better."

John Foster Dulles, then chairman of the Rockefeller Foundation, concluded after observations acquired on a number of tours abroad that there was a "need to stop the expansion of the non-white populations." In 1952, Frederick Osborn, an officer of the American Eugenics Society, assisted John D. Rockefeller III in organizing the Population Council and served as its first administrator. In 1958, Eisenhower selected William H. Draper to head a committee to evaluate appropriate military actions in other countries. Draper suggested that a better focus should be the threat of population explosion and a study on depopulation procedures for poorer non-white countries that pose a national security threat to the U.S. [15] Apparently, a burgeoning non-white population might reduce available resources that would be put to better use by white populations. Additionally, growing populations produce resentful individuals who aggressively oppose elitist policies.

In 1965, the Population Action International (originally known as the Population Crisis Committee), was founded by Hugh Moore, Lammot du Pont Copeland and William H. Draper Jr. The worldwide organization is headquartered in Washington, DC. Since 2001, in conjunction with the Population Action International, and with the encouragement of Congress, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) distributes information in foreign countries in an effort to initiate family planning and cover other reproductive health programs.

In 1961, John D. Rockefeller III presented the Second McDougall Lecture to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization. This predated by a decade Rockefeller's population protocols that would become part of Kissinger's NSSM 200. Rockefeller, in his address, said, "To my mind, population growth is second only to control of atomic weapons as the paramount problem of the day." [16]

The Rockefeller Foundation funded England's eugenics movement. The Rockefeller family had early ties to the House of Rothschild to which the gigantic Standard oil trust owed its beginnings. Presumably, the Rothschilds, a Talmudic family with early Masonic and Illuminati connections, actively promoted and financed eugenics and depopulation behind the scenes. By the 1960s, the Eugenics Society of England embraced Crypto-eugenics, under which they would participate in eugenics without actually calling it eugenics. The Rockefellers lent their support to England's Eugenics Society by establishing the International Planned Parenthood Federation, in conjunction with the Eugenics Society. This formed a private, global system in which the elite could choreograph an international holocaust, within the context of offering humanitarian services, all under the jurisdiction of the U.N. flag, another Rockefeller front organization.

George H. W. Bush of Texas, who served in Congress from January 3, 1967 to January 3, 1971, originated a legislative investigation of world overpopulation. [18] Dr. D. M. MacArthur, Deputy Director of Research & Technology for the Pentagon, Department of Defense, requested $10 million from the Congressional House Subcommittee on Appropriations to develop a biological weapon through House Bill 15090. On June 9, 1969, the House Republican research task committee, chaired by George H. W. Bush, heard testimony from General William H. Draper, of the Population Crisis Committee and Dr. William Moran of the Population Reference Bureau. Draper reported that there were three issues relevant to population control — the census of 1970 in the U.S. and of 1971 in Britain should be worldwide and not limited to two countries, accelerating contraception, and the World Health Organization should implement their international programs such as inoculations, etc. [19] Leading World Health Organization scientists, as noted in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization, had requested that viruses be created in order to study their affects on humans.


VRM: The Rockefeller Foundation Drafts A Post-Pandemic Scenario



The Rockefeller Family Secret! – Jews

By The Rockefeller Family Secret! – Jews
Jan 31, 2011 - 4:34:58 AM


(Did I mention yet it was Jewish? ;-D)

and go to the bottom of the page and you can search for family surnames: ENTER ROCKEFELLER and SEE: They are to be found under THREE database categories of Jewish Ancestry Research – J – K- & T

ROCKEFELLER can be found in these databases of JEWISH FAMILY NAMES:

J. JewishGen Family Finder (97,391 surnames). Surnames being researched by some 60,000 Jewish genealogists worldwide. An on-going project–continuously updated. Online database

K. Family Tree of the Jewish People (184,237 surnames). 2,000,000 persons who appear on family trees being researched by Jewish genealogists. An on-going project–continuously updated. Online database


T. First American Jewish Families (4,758 surnames). 50,000 descendants of Jewish-American families who arrived in America in the period 1654-1838. (Out of print) Book

Some say the real name of the Rockefellers was originally Rockenfelder – and there appears to have been a village of Rockenfeld

Rockefeller Name Meaning and History: From German: habitational name for someone from the village of Rockenfeld near Neuwied, Rhineland, named in Middle High German with rocke ‘rye’ (Old High German rocko) + feld ‘open country’. [Should really be 'Offenfelder' to mean directly 'open fields' -

or 'Offenlands' to mean directly 'open lands or country' ?]

BUT try entering REICHENFELDER WHICH in German translates into RICH FIELDS as in “RICH OIL FIELDS” perhaps??? ;-D

Reichenfelder/Reichenfeld is still found quite abundantly on Avotaynu as a Jewish surname(s) under these surname databases: G-J-K-N-U-W.

If it had been originally Reichenfeller that would translate roughly into “RICH FELLER” which is very closely sounding like “RICH FELLOW”~!!! And the Rockefellers are certainly rich fellows~!!!

A book overlooked by most people and published for sale mainly within the Jewish community states that the Rockefellers are Jews of Sephardic descent (meaning Spanish and Portuguese Jews). The book is entitled “The Grandees – America’s Sephardic Elite.” The author is Stephen Birmingham, who is recognized by the Jewish community as an expert on Jewish history.

The publisher of “The Grandees” is the Jewish owned publishing firm of “Harper and Row” of New York City. Mr. Birmingham also wrote the book “Our Crowd” about the family background of America’s wealthiest and most successful Jews. Both books have been hailed by Jewish publications as first class works in the documentation of Jewish history.

In “The Grandees” Stephen Birmingham reveals the existence of a very rare book which was published only for Jews some years ago. The work was published only for Jews some years ago. The work was compiled by the Jewish historian Malcolm H. Stern and entitled “Americans of Jewish Decent.” That book weighed 10 pounds and gave the history of 25,000 Jewish individuals in America. It is extremely interesting to note that only 550 copies of the book were printed and each copy was consecutively numbered. The book was delivered to the top Jewish community leaders in America for their personal reference files in dealing with and contacting Jews who are “Marranos” (those Jews who “PRETEND” to be Christians in their community but secretly hold to their Jewish faith and race when among their own kind).

Mr. Birmingham in “The Grandees” reports: “Who would expect to find the Rockefellers in the book.” Stern’s work traces what he calls the “Nobility of Jewry – the Sephardim who lived in Spain and Portugal as princes of the land.” Many centuries ago the Jews flooded into Spain in great numbers and through usury and stealth became vast land owners. The Jews controlled both Spain and Portugal through their monopoly over the finances of the country.

It was in 1492 that King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain expelled the Jews from their country and confiscated their ill-gotten wealth. It was during this period that the Rockefeller family moved to the Turkish Empire which welcomed the Jews at that time, believing them to be a “poor persecuted people.”

The grandfather of our former Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller, admitted that his family once moved from Turkey to France. It was from France that they moved to America. John D. Rockefeller, Sr., was a wealthy man even before he took over Standard Oil Co., which made their family one of the richest in the world. No one has ever explained how this family came into such wealth as soon as they arrived in America from France.

There is no known information on how the Rockefellers came into huge amounts of money in France. Some think they got their money from the Rothschilds and were originally their agents in buying up Christian businesses in America. “Marranos” are Jews who “PRETEND” to convert to Christianity so as to deceive Christians in their business dealings, but secretly continued to practice Judaism in private rituals. For this reason, a Marrano family like the Rockefellers would make the perfect tool for the Rothschilds of France who have for centuries used secret agents to carry on their work.

“The Thunderbolt” was the first publication to bring Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller’s Jewish ancestry to public attention. This information finally explains why he has always been able to work so closely with Jewish interests and why his administration as governor of New York was loaded down with Jews from top to bottom. His political campaigns of the past were always directed by Jews and he was always the support of the Jewish community in all of his political races.

Normally the Jews would not support a Christian multi-millionaire for political office because they would be afraid they could not control him after the election. The fact that Jewish community leaders have long known that the Rockefellers were fellow Jews goes a long way in explaining why the organized Jewish community has always supported the Rockefeller’s political ambitions. Now we can see why Nelson and David Rockefeller boosted his fellow Jew Henry Kissinger into the Nixon administration and Kissinger in turn has used his position to bring his fellow Jew Rockefeller into power.

The Rockefellers also married into relatives of the Rothschilds, a Gantz.

The Rockefellers are in fact, Jewish, they head up world wide Sephardic, Jewry. They are deep crypto Jews. One only need look at the photos of the Rockerfeller Clan to see they are Sephardic Jews and hang out with Sephardic Jews, guys like Nick Rockefeller, Neva Goodwin Rockefeller, Jay Rockefeller, etc. Bill Clinton is the illegitimate son of Winthrop Rockefeller and the Bush family real name is possibly Scherf – (Scherf could still be a Jewish name under the search as found on Avotaynu Scherf is found: SCHERF under these surname databases: A-B-G-H-J-K-N-p).

Some links that show support of this possibility/assertion of the name Scherf: (Big family picture here)

[However Bush is a frequently used Jewish name found in the earliest records of America

Search BUSH  on and you will see they are found in these MANY Jewish family surname databases: A-B-C-D-E-J-K-O-Q-R-T-g-p .

Remember T is the

(T.) First American Jewish Families (4,758 surnames). 50,000 descendants of Jewish-American families who arrived in America in the period 1654-1838. (Out of print) Book],

(continuing)..they are German Jews, and former Nazis. Prescott Bush and adopted into the bush family and given a phony identity, along with his sons.

The Bushes as Jewish and Foreign born presidents go is nothing unusual at all (like Obama possibly born in Kenya? But Obama is also quite Jewish).

SEE  Obama’s Jewish Grandfather by Henry Makow, Ph.D. (Makow is Jewish) Though Obama’s maternal side being Jewish is pretty well settled among those who know these ‘Jewish’ things (his real father may still be in question – SEE:

(Obama’s maternal Jewish grandfather) Stanley Dunham’s mother Ruth ( a common Jewish name) Lucille Armour committed suicide when Stanley was eight-years-old. His father abandoned him and his brother to their grandparents. What would cause a mother of two boys to commit suicide?

Obama’s mother, “Stanley Anne”, became a Communist and fought the “Establishment” not realising the Communists ARE the Establishment. She allowed a Communist degenerate Frank Davis to take pornographic pictures of her, which are on the Internet. (Google Images) Davis boasted of bedding white women and some believe Davis is Obama’s real father. Certainly Barack Obama Sr. didn’t waste any time abandoning mother and son. )

SEE: Is The Commie Frank Marshall Davis Obama’s Daddy?? Is it possible that all that our supposedly ‘illegally’ sitting POTUS is really hiding is that his daddy was a really Commie SOB?

Undoing the Kenyan possibility is the high likelihood that the “marriage” between Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham was a sham. Frank Marshall Davis having taken pornographic pictures of Obama’s mother lends credence to the very real possibility that he bedded and impregnated her with our present POTUS. Maybe the shame is more in the Communist background than in the out of wedlock origination which would of course make Obama ‘legitimately’ an illegitimate child  i.e. a bastard! (Are there any real doubts? That he’s a real bastard I mean ;-D)

When Barack Sr. left Hawaii a year after Obama’s birth, Ann’s father Stanley was there to see him off with smiles. He would always speak well of the black man who knocked up his daughter and then abandoned wife and child — mighty unusual behavior from a father-in-law.

* There was a marriage license from another county, Maui — a classic way to avoid local notification — and a divorce, but if there was a wedding, then no one attended it. There was no ring, no photos, no leis. (But somebody surely must have ‘laid’ Obama’s mom! ;-D)

Ann Dunham met Barack Sr. in Russian class. (In 1960, people like Lee Harvey Oswald took Russian classes.) The possibility that the Dunhams recruited Barack Sr. to front for a less savory impregnation of Ann by a black man makes more sense than the fabled romance. Obama looks nothing like Barack Sr.

* No, there is absolutely no reason to believe that the father was Malcolm X.

(But Obama sure looks like Frank Marshall Davis!)

SEE: President Frank Marshall Davis Obama!!

And more reasons for Obama to be embarrassed over his real father being Frank Davis and coming to light:

On a side note: Obama’s mom had something for Oil men it seems:

Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Dunham met her second husband, Lolo Sotoero, at the East West Center on the University of Hawaii Campus. Ann Dunham had met her son’s father, Barack Obama, Sr., on the same campus years earlier, that time in a Russian language class. She seems to have had a thing for men who work for oil companies, too, since ObaOne worked for Shell and Lolo worked for Mobil. And this led to a rather interesting relationship to the Geithner & Rockefeller families and the CIA:

Even stranger yet is this possibility which seems to agree in regards to many thinking that Obama was cloned from the DNA of the Pharoahs – Is this just to throw us off of the Jewish connections?:

SEE: – Freeman has openly admitted that his father was a Grand Master of a Freemason Lodge and Freeman is one of the 13 major bloodline families of the Illuminati SEE: for a lively discussion)

Could it be that: BHO was likely born of the seed of Michael Rockefeller and DNA extracted from the sarcophagus of Cleopatra, former two-time Queen of Egypt.

(Was Cleopatra ‘Jewish’? SEE:




The Hebrew Pharaohs of Egypt: The Secret Lineage of the Patriarch Joseph

There is overwhelming evidence that the technologies to create such a creature existed in Austria as far back as 1926, and was accomplished by 1952. Rockefeller’s faked disappearance in 1961, the alleged year that BHO was born, itself, a sequence of implausible events and cover ups, was designed to prevent anyone from ever learning the truth about available technologies and how those technologies were being used.

The Nazis, the Soviets and others, on behalf of the Illuminati, worked together to accomplish their goal: the creation of a New World Order, founded on a hybrid personality programmed to do their bidding. The above referenced articles specifically reveal faked photographs and video productions, and the trail to how BHO was created. My conclusions are born out of the previously undisclosed facts about Rockefeller’s ‘disappearance’ and the ever-present involvement of the Rockefeller-created “Dunham” clan , Obama’s supposed family– all Rockefeller agents.

The following are deductions and conclusions, both before and after research: SEE:

Then we have the strange case of Eisenhower:

After it was revealed that former U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower was not born in Denison, Texas in 1890, nor anywhere else in the United States, a flurry of ‘Eisenhower’ articles appeared on the Internet as an ineffectually feeble, psychological counterbalance to the revelation that Eisenhower (aka David Dwight Eisenhower) was not a natural-born U.S. citizen. It so happens that he real name was “Johann Adolf Eisenhauer,” and his lineage was traced to Solka, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary.

To the uninformed, the U.S. Constitution disqualifies anyone not born on American soil from becoming the president of the United States, though research proves that Johann Adolf Eisenhauer, George H. Scherff, Jr. (aka George Herbert Walker Bush), and Barry Rockefeller (aka Barack Hussein Obama, Jr./Barry Soetoro) accomplished the feat. The Constitution is quite definitive on the issue, yet three separate congressional conventions aided and abetted in the subterfuge of the American government.

The revelations you are about to read will not only expose the fraud committed to further Dwight D. Eisenhower’s own political ambitions, they will expose a massive, international plot to derail the U.S. Constitution, turning its principles over to a gang of organized Zionist, Fascist and Communist thugs intent on destroying America from within. What you are about to read will require us to rewrite history. Let that process begin here.

AND WHO DID ALL THIS RESEARCH? About Obama Pharoah Clone & Eisenhower & also on the Bush/Scherf connections??? One in depth researcher who covered these topics is Don Nicoloff:

Don Nicoloff has specialized in genealogical research uncovering the true families and histories of previous U.S. Presidents, contenders for the presidency and other hidden information, bringing readers to the destiny the elite has planned for us. The Idaho Observer printed many of his earlier exposes, including “Deathbed Confessions: Photos support claims that George H. Scherff, Jr. was the 41st president” (April – June 2008), “The Three Stooges go to Washington – Parts 1-7” (2008 – 2009) and “Following the money backwards leads to President Reagan, Russian rubles and Ambassador Leo Wanta” (Jan. 2007). A couple of these articles were tightened due to space constrictions. His latest research on Dwight D. “Ike” Eisenhower also not having a real birth certificate from Texas is memorialized in “Eisenhower 1952 Birth-Certificate Fraud Revealed” and much more about “Eisenhauer” in “Teenage Mutant Ninja Eisenhauers – Parts 1 and 2” and was not printed in The I.O. due to space (the entire three part epic is over 20,000 words plus pictures.) We encourage all readers who have access to the internet to read Don Nicoloff’s articles at his website (see ad on next page.) His most recent research ties in “Wanta-gate” with “Eisenhauer”. Believe me, this is HUGE regarding the absolute control the banksters have over us, and how their plan has been in place and moving forward for centuries. Download it while you can and make copies for both your files and sharing.

So it’s all in the family, so to speak. For now they have grafted in a few non-Jews to give world Jewish government or world Zionist government some ‘cover’, but these people will be disposed of. I urge you to research the Rockefeller family, they are CLEARLY SEPHARDIC JEWS, and the 2nd richest Jewish family in the world after the Rothschilds. Al gore married his daughter in the Schiff banking faimily. Jenna Bush married a Hagar and this family are cryto Jews. Hagars brother married into a prominent Jewish family, who owned a large part of HBO.

This New World Order is so Jewish, it looks like the last supper, especially the Rockefellers.

It should be renamed the JWO for Jew World Order! In addition, I knew a Rockefeller who admitted to me the family was Jewish and who would not go by the name Rockefeller and he married a Jewish woman in the Presbyterian church, like the Rockefellers do typically these days.


Is this all true? It sure does make sense.

Rothschilds & Rockefellers – Trillionaires Of The World

Rockefeller vs Rothschild

Found at:



A book overlooked by most people and published for sale mainly within the Jewish community states that the Rockefellers are Jews of Sephardic descent (meaning Spanish and Portuguese Jews). The book is entitled "The Grandees - America's Sephardic Elite." The author is Stephen Birmingham, who is recognized by the Jewish community as an expert on Jewish history.

   The publisher of "The Grandees" is the Jewish owned publishing firm of "Harper and Row" of New York City. Mr. Birmingham also wrote the book "Our Crowd" about the family background of America's wealthiest and most successful Jews. Both books have been hailed by Jewish publications as first class works in the documentation of Jewish history.

   In "The Grandees" Stephen Birmingham reveals the existence of a very rare book which was published only for Jews some years ago. The work was published only for Jews some years ago. The work was compiled by the Jewish historian Malcolm H. Stern and entitled "Americans of Jewish Decent." That book weighed 10 pounds and gave the history of 25,000 Jewish individuals in America. It is extremely interesting to note that only 550 copies of the book were printed and each copy was consecutively numbered. The book was delivered to the top Jewish community leaders in America for their personal reference files in dealing with and contacting Jews who are "Marranos" (those Jews who "PRETEND" to be Christians in their community but secretly hold to their Jewish faith and race when among their own kind).

   Mr. Birmingham in "The Grandees" reports: "Who would expect to find the Rockefellers in the book." Stern's work traces what he calls the "Nobility of Jewry - the Sephardim who lived in Spain and Portugal as princes of the land." Many centuries ago the Jews flooded into Spain in great numbers and through usury and stealth became vast land owners. The Jews controlled both Spain and Portugal through their monopoly over the finances of the country.

   It was in 1492 that King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain expelled the Jews from their country and confiscated their ill-gotten wealth. It was during this period that the Rockefeller family moved to the Turkish Empire which welcomed the Jews at that time, believing them to be a "poor persecuted people."

   The grandfather of our former Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller, admitted that his family once moved from Turkey to France. It was from France that they moved to America. John D. Rockefeller, Sr., was a wealthy man even before he took over Standard Oil Co., which made their family one of the richest in the world. No one has ever explained how this family came into such wealth as soon as they arrived in America from France.

   There is no known information on how the Rockefellers came into huge amounts of money in France. Some thing they got their money from the Rothschilds and were originally their agents in buying up Christian businesses in America. "Marranos" are Jews who "PRETEND" to convert to Christianity so as to deceive Christians in their business dealings, but secretly continued to practice Judaism in private rituals. For this reason, a Marrano family like the Rockefellers would make the perfect tool for the Rothschilds of France who have for centuries used secret agents to carry on their work.

   "The Thunderbolt" was the first publication to bring Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller's Jewish ancestry to public attention. This information finally explains why he has always been able to work so closely with Jewish interests and why his administration as governor of New York was loaded down with Jews from top to bottom. His political campaigns of the past were always directed by Jews and he was always the support of the Jewish community in all of his political races.

   Normally the Jews would not support a Christian multi-millionaire for political office because they would be afraid they could not control him after the election. The fact that Jewish community leaders have long known that the Rockefellers were fellow Jews goes a long way in explaining why the organized Jewish community has always supported the Rockefeller's political ambitions. Now we can see why Nelson and David Rockefeller boosted his fellow Jew Henry Kissinger into the Nixon administration and Kissinger in turn has used his position to bring his fellow Jew Rockefeller into power.

Is this all true? It sure does make sense.


The Rockefeller BDS empire, the New Israel Fund, and campus anti-Semitism


Watch–Beto O’Rourke to Black American: Illegal Immigrant Labor Needed for Cotton Gin


{We can clearly see the problems with the Rockefellers.

We even hear some people joke about how the Rockefellers could be the saviours of humanity.

We can see that the Rockefellers are a threat to the white race.

We can see that the Rockefellers are in with the Rothschilds.

We can see that the Rockefellers are in with the Jews.

We hear many accuse the Rockefellers of trying to kill off whites, and create an one world Jewish race.

We must arrest the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, we should hold trials for the Rockefellers and

We demand that we regulate the population of the white race, so that many different groups
cannot try to infiltrate and destroy western civilization.

Many accuse the Rockefellers of wanting to destroy the majority of humanity. We can see
now that many groups even want to try and replace humans with machines.

We need to stop the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and many other groups from trying to overthrow
western society with Antifa style communist and socialist groups. We need to stop these
groups from trying to bring in more unwanted third world immigrants into Europe, America,
Canada, Australia and other first world nations.

We must stop this One World Jewish religion and the One World Jewish race.

What exactly is going on with the Rockfeller Foundation, we demand answers and want 
the Rockefellers and Rothschilds to stand trial. We know also that the Vatican and Freemasons also continue to help these groups as well, and that we should also arrest many Freemasons, the British Royal Family and high level Vatican officials}.


For more information view our following articles.

The Eugenics Investigation


 Gmo Vaccines Investigated


The Dysgenics Investigation